Physicists Show Both Russia And Turkey Were Lying About The Downed Russian Plane

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
90,579
21,791
113
No such thing. Israel has a legal responsibility to allow refugees to return once conditions allow - AKA peace.
No, there is no precedent anywhere that says Israel can continue to avoid legal responsibility purely by also delaying and stopping all peace talks.

Israel should settle with the Palestinian refugees, including restitution for nearly 50 years of being forced to live in refugee camps while Israel avoided peace.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,011
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
No, there is no precedent anywhere that says Israel can continue to avoid legal responsibility purely by also delaying and stopping all peace talks.

Israel should settle with the Palestinian refugees, including restitution for nearly 50 years of being forced to live in refugee camps while Israel avoided peace.
Israel has no legal responsibility here.

Maybe you should focus on the countries that actually forced them to live in refugee camps...
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,291
6,661
113
No, there is no precedent anywhere that says Israel can continue to avoid legal responsibility purely by also delaying and stopping all peace talks.

Israel should settle with the Palestinian refugees, including restitution for nearly 50 years of being forced to live in refugee camps while Israel avoided peace.
Your right. there is no precedent since as usual you are making up shit. The fact that you continue to blame Israel for the lack of peace while praising Hamas as a peace group despite their outright refusal to accept any peace deal and openly calling for more attacks on civilians is pathetic.

And in case you missed it, Israel has made several offers for a Palestinians state that included restitution for the decedents of Palestinian refugees (while also not expecting the same for similar numbers of Jews chased from their Arab homes by racism).
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,011
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Israel is the occupying power.
They rule by military force.

Blaming those occupied for the lack of peace is the ultimate wifebeater's defence.
Its stupid.
More bullshit. All you ever do is lie and mislead and deceive.

The occupation occurred because of Arab aggression against Israel.

The occupation continues because of Palestinian aggression against Israel.

You are just pissed off that your terror pals aren't able to inflict even greater harm on Israel--which is exactly what they would do if there was no occupation. The attack on Israel from Gaza only increased after Israel withdrew--Hamas turned it into a terrorist enclave.

All you do is blame the victim--Israel--and spew a bunch of bullshit and lies.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,489
1,359
113
No such thing. Israel has a legal responsibility to allow refugees to return once conditions allow - AKA peace. There is absolutely no legal precedent to force a country to take generations of people born in other countries because their ancestors were refugees.

And Israel is an absolute failure at 'ethnic cleansing' The population of Arabs in the former Mandate is 6 or 7 times what it was in 1947 and a good many of them are full Israeli citizens.
conditions have allowed for a long time. If so many arabs live peacefully in Israel, then what grounds does Israel have to slam the door behind those that fled and confiscate their property? Israel has succeeded in maintaining a Jewish majority. Perhaps "ethnic cleansing" is the wrong term, perhaps Ethnic pruning would be more appropriate.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,489
1,359
113
Nope. You are wrong. That is false.

1. Their ancestor wasn't ethnically cleansed, and

2. Ethnic cleansing isn't a heritable trait, and

3. Arab countries, the aggressors who started the war, are the responsible parties

Israel has an obligation to compensate people for lost property, or who are the heirs of lost property. Property rights are heritable, unlike what you are talking about.
So your point is that if people die then the crime is forgiven? Even if ethic cleansing is not heritable, property rights are, as are citizenship and residence. Confiscating property along ethnic lines is illegal. But of course you will probably gloss this over and not comment on it because you know it is inherently wrong and indefeasible.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,011
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
So your point is that if people die then the crime is forgiven? Even if ethic cleansing is not heritable, property rights are, as are citizenship and residence. Confiscating property along ethnic lines is illegal. But of course you will probably gloss this over and not comment on it because you know it is inherently wrong and indefeasible.
You can't just make up non existent crimes. The whole premise of your claim is false, no one was ethnically cleansed.

Property rights certainly are heritable which is why every peace deal Israel has proposed had included compensation for property. Maybe the Palestinians shield say yes to one someday!

And Israel offered that even though the Arab nations have never offered compensation for the property lost by the Jews ethnically cleansed from those nations.

Meanwhile this point has carried: the Palestinians living in Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, etc, are the responsibility of those nations both because that is where they were born, and also because the aggression of those nations caused the war from which those people fled.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,291
6,661
113
Israel is the occupying power.
They rule by military force.

Blaming those occupied for the lack of peace is the ultimate wifebeater's defence.
Its stupid.
So once again you refuse to criticize Hamas who outright refuses peace and calls for continued attacks on Israeli civilians. Hamas are the wife beaters to both Israeli civilians and their own.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,291
6,661
113
conditions have allowed for a long time. If so many arabs live peacefully in Israel, then what grounds does Israel have to slam the door behind those that fled and confiscate their property? Israel has succeeded in maintaining a Jewish majority. Perhaps "ethnic cleansing" is the wrong term, perhaps Ethnic pruning would be more appropriate.
Your right. The conditions are there but the Palestinian leadership refuses to accept them. Peace will not be possible until the Palestinian leadership is willing to accept peace with Israel.

And even 'pruning' is a ridiculous term when the population of Israeli Arabs and West Bank Palestinians continues to grow.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,489
1,359
113
Your right. The conditions are there but the Palestinian leadership refuses to accept them. Peace will not be possible until the Palestinian leadership is willing to accept peace with Israel.

And even 'pruning' is a ridiculous term when the population of Israeli Arabs and West Bank Palestinians continues to grow.
It was one giant pruning without which demographics would be substantially different today.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,011
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
It was one giant pruning without which demographics would be substantially different today.
It wasn't a "pruning", it was a civil war started by Arab nations during which a large number of Arabs refused to remain in territory captured by Jews. No-one was ethnically cleansed, and regardless of your opinion on that you don't have an automatic right of citizenship to a country just because your ancestor decided to leave it. Otherwise many people would be citizens of a half dozen countries and eventually we'd all be citizens of every country.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
90,579
21,791
113
So once again you refuse to criticize Hamas who outright refuses peace and calls for continued attacks on Israeli civilians. Hamas are the wife beaters to both Israeli civilians and their own.
In that post I also didn't criticize China or Putin.

But none of those have any bearing on Israel ruling Palestine through military occupation.
They are in the drivers seat and control the outcome, by force.

The wifebeater analogy only works on Israel, they are the military force armed with drones, tanks, jets, guided missiles and nukes.
Hamas has none of those.

Relying on the wifebeater defence 'they deserved it' or 'they asked for it' is just pathetic.
Only the prison guards can decide when prisoners get to leave, not the prisoners.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,489
1,359
113
You can't just make up non existent crimes. The whole premise of your claim is false, no one was ethnically cleansed.

Property rights certainly are heritable which is why every peace deal Israel has proposed had included compensation for property. Maybe the Palestinians shield say yes to one someday!

And Israel offered that even though the Arab nations have never offered compensation for the property lost by the Jews ethnically cleansed from those nations.

Meanwhile this point has carried: the Palestinians living in Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, etc, are the responsibility of those nations both because that is where they were born, and also because the aggression of those nations caused the war from which those people fled.
You are right, they have offered compensation and some right of return. But it is always tied to some shitty deal that the Palis cannot agree to. The issue of right of return my be agreed to as a SEPARATE precondition. Israel needs to sign a deal, that is guaranteed by the US and EU. The deal only goes into effect with a total peace and is tied to Israels GDP growth rate or some inflation adjuster. Going back to square one has always been the issue. A deal is close, then ..nothing. Its like effin ground hog day. The Oslo process tried to end this, but Israel has blown it to pieces.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,011
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
You are right, they have offered compensation and some right of return
Israel has offered return to the ACTUAL refugees who left, never their descendants, and yes, compensation. And the only thing you and your pally terror buddies think it's a shitty deal is that it leaves Israel intact as a Jewish state. Otherwise it's always been a fantastic offer and one entirely in line with what the Arab league suggests is fair. The fact is that the Palestinians don't want peace--they continue to want the destruction of Israel.

What ended the Oslo process was Hamas. Israel began the staged withdrawl from Palestinian territory, and what happened? It turned into a terrorist enclave. It was supposed to be a confidence building measure whereby each side would gain some trust of the other and the Palestinians were supposed to engage in building a state. Instead, they built rockets.

Israel needs to sign a deal, that is guaranteed by the US and EU.
Israel can guarantee its own deals, cut the blatant racist bullshit.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,291
6,661
113
It was one giant pruning without which demographics would be substantially different today.
First off, the 'pruning' was mostly of the free will of the Arabs who left out of fear during a war started when the Arabs refused to accept partition. Very very few were actually forced out after their villages and towns engaged in attacks. And the 'pruning' of the Arab states which chased equal numbers of Jews to Israel? Israel took in 800,000 Jewish refugees chased from Arab lands. Meanwhile the Arab states locked their Arab brothers in camps without rights.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,291
6,661
113
In that post I also didn't criticize China or Putin.

But none of those have any bearing on Israel ruling Palestine through military occupation.....
Wait, are you really saying that Hamas (the elected Legislature of the last Palestinian elections) refusing top accept peace has no bearing on the lack of peace. Shit your excuses are getting more and more pathetic.

Fact is that the Palestinian leadership that refuses peace and instead encourages attacks on civilians are the wife beaters.
 
Toronto Escorts