Well, it looks like the "crisis" is not that bad. Wynn flew to Paris TWICE. Generally speaking anybody who believes in an imminent danger due to emissions would refrain from abusing the atmosphere with jet fuel. Would they not? Therefore, I will follow my leaders' example.
October Smashes Temperature Records Practically Guaranteeing 2015 Will Be HottestYear
- Thread starter twizz
- Start date
So, now we're to believe that this "Frankfooter" person quoted below is a "fossil fuel backed hack". :biggrin1:
And for bonus, here's a chart of projections vs reality, which you still claim are 'spectacularly wrong'.
So, now you're claiming the graph doesn't show a gold line for the average of CMIP5, which the IPCC confirmed is what it currently uses for its projections (Page 19: http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/report/WG1AR5_SPM_FINAL.pdf).
I think you need to get your eyes checked.
I'm reminded of the quote from a lawyer that appeared at the end of a recent Rex Murphy column:
"I’ll believe it’s a crisis when those who tell me it’s a crisis start acting like it’s a crisis."
http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/rex-murphy-empty-words-from-the-climate-doomsayers
First, that's a different report from the one you used previously, any references to this chart are irrelevant, as we haven't discussed it yet.
Second, there is no chart on page 19 with a gold line, you need to get your eyes checked.
I thought you just needed scientific proof, now you say its the attitude that will convince you?
Oy vey.
On Page 19 of the IPCC's Summary for Policy Makers, the IPCC makes it perfectly clear that it is using the CMIP5 run: http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/report/WG1AR5_SPM_FINAL.pdf
The graph with the gold line that measures the current CMIP5 "projection" is the one from Hotwhopper that Frankfooter posted.
The reality remains clear: The 0.71ºC anomaly is well below the IPCC prediction of 0.85ºC.And for bonus, here's a chart of projections vs reality, which you still claim are 'spectacularly wrong'.
And this is the official IPCC chart as used in their projections, not the chart from hotwhopper.
But then you are the one who also has no idea of what is spectacularly wrong or not.
Moviefan thinks 0.0027ºC is 'spectacularly wrong'.
Ditto that thought ! This is the winter weather I prefer ... 14 C ... hopefully this represents the winter season cold wave but I know it won't last.
YEP, a just another natural phenomena that CONTROLS the climate.
Been happening for ever, much like the polar vortex.
FAST
These are the geniuses leading the climate change debate (Sorry Leo, I like you as an actor. Maybe you should stick to that):
http://www.theweathernetwork.com/ne...o-dicaprio-over-climate-change-remarks/60935/
http://www.theweathernetwork.com/ne...o-dicaprio-over-climate-change-remarks/60935/
I would be more convinced of global warming/climate change if records went back say, a few thousand years as opposed to the last 100.
Actually, I think it was a noble act of chivalry -- Leo jumped into the fray to make Emma Thompson look a little less stupid.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...g-claim-world-s-temperature-rise-4C-2030.html
Yes, we know -- you continue to insist that there is no line on the Hotwhopper graph for CMIP5.
I'll say the same thing I said yesterday. Get your eyes checked.
And for bonus, here's a chart of projections vs reality, which you still claim are 'spectacularly wrong'.
Exactly, 100 years is completely meaningless, well except for a few tax funded agencies, means a lot to them.
FAST
No, that's an actor commenting on the issue.
Nobody has claimed he's a genius but you, but I guess in comparison....
