Taxpayers pay for Trudeau’s Nannies

GameBoy27

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2004
12,728
2,631
113
I don't actually have a problem with taxpayers footing the bill. But after he stated during his campaign that rich families like his and former prime minister Stephen Harper’s didn’t need taxpayers’ help, what does he do? He hires taxpayer funded nannies. That makes him a hypocrite!

After Trudeau promised to give his universal child benefit to charity, CBC reports taxpayers are paying wages for his children’s two nannies.

The only good news for Prime Minister Justin Trudeau about the first mini-uproar to hit since his swearing-in last month is that the term “Nannygate” has already been taken.

The CBC reported Monday that Canadian taxpayers are paying the wages of two nannies hired to care for the three young children of Trudeau and his wife, Sophie Grégoire-Trudeau.

Cabinet last week authorized the appointment of the two women under the Official Residences Act as “special assistants at the prime minister’s residence.” They will be paid between $15 and $20 an hour during the day and $11 to $13 an hour for night shifts effective Nov. 4 — the day Trudeau and his cabinet were sworn in.

In modern life, nannies and child-care present a hot-button Rorschach test of socioeconomic and political values — touching as they do on the emotion-charged issues of parenthood, feminism, race, fair compensation and exploitation. And social media promptly lit up in outrage at the nanny hirings.

Inevitably, the term Nannygate will also raise its clichéd head, thought it was first applied more than 20 years ago in the U.S. when President Bill Clinton’s nominee for Attorney General, Zoe Baird, stepped down after it became known she and her husband had employed two illegal immigrants as a nanny and chauffeur.

The CBC report came after an election campaign in which Trudeau repeatedly attacked the Conservatives’ enhanced universal child care benefit, or UCCB, and income splitting for families, arguing rich families like his and former prime minister Stephen Harper’s didn’t need taxpayers’ help.

“In these times, Mr. Harper’s top priority is to give wealthy families like his and mine $2,000,” Trudeau said in reference to the Conservatives’ income-splitting tax credit. “Let me tell you something: We don’t need it. And Canada can’t afford it.”
Trudeau is also entitled to collect annual UCCB payments of about $3,400 for his three children. He promised to give the money to charity.

The prime minister is paid about $330,000 annually. The federal government for which he is responsible has a budget of about $280 billion a year.

The CBC said one of the women hired was with the Trudeaus this past week on the prime minister’s foreign trip that wrapped up Monday at the United Nations climate change conference in Paris. She posted photos online of the couple’s two children who came on the trip. There were also shots of her with the Trudeaus’ youngest child on Facebook visiting museums and at the hotel where they stayed in Paris.

Kate Purchase, Trudeau's director of communications, says in a statement the family employs two household employees as secondary caregivers who also perform what she calls "other duties around the house."

Purchase has yet to specify what those other duties entail, but notes that a small number of staff provide assistance to the Trudeau family, and that similar arrangements existed for their predecessors.

Section 7.1 of the Official Residence Act says cabinet may appoint “a steward or housekeeper and such other employees” deemed necessary for the management of the prime minister’s residence.

This isn’t the first time questions have been raised about whether taxpayers were footing the bill for child care.

The issue arose in May 1984 when then Conservative leader Brian Mulroney was asked by a television interviewer if taxpayers would pay for “nannies” for his three children as they did for Trudeau’s father, ************ Trudeau, when he was prime minister.

“No,” Mulroney replied.

http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2015/12/01/taxpayers-pay-for-trudeaus-nannies-report.html
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,011
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Because it would be so much better for Canada to have a prime minister too busy cooking dinner for his kids to run the country? Last I checked "prime minister" wasn't a 9 to 5 job.
 

destillat

Well-known member
Aug 29, 2001
2,803
56
48
mississauga
Because it would be so much better for Canada to have a prime minister too busy cooking dinner for his kids to run the country? Last I checked "prime minister" wasn't a 9 to 5 job.
How about he pays for his nanny out of his salary? Like every other fucking Canadian that has a nanny.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,840
113
Do as I say, not as I do. Besides, he's entitled to his entitlements. Didn't take long, that's for sure.
 

GameBoy27

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2004
12,728
2,631
113
Because it would be so much better for Canada to have a prime minister too busy cooking dinner for his kids to run the country? Last I checked "prime minister" wasn't a 9 to 5 job.
I would say without a doubt he needs a nanny. Except during his campaign he said “In these times, Mr. Harper’s top priority is to give wealthy families like his and mine $2,000,” Trudeau said in reference to the Conservatives’ income-splitting tax credit. “Let me tell you something: We don’t need it. And Canada can’t afford it.”

Then he turns around and has taxpayers pay for them. That makes him a hypocrite.

How about he pays for his nanny out of his salary? Like every other fucking Canadian that has a nanny.
You mean lead by example? That's not how the 1% roll.
 

saxon

Well-known member
Dec 2, 2009
4,759
520
113
Why can't Mrs. Trudeau run the household? Is she that bad a housewife?
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,011
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
How about he pays for his nanny out of his salary? Like every other fucking Canadian that has a nanny.
Every other fucking Canadian has a 9 to 5 job. When you ask someone to work 24/7 you as an employer ought to provide services to make that a possibility.

Get over you political partisanship. We need a PM who is always available to deal with the business of the nation. He needs security. Transportation. Personal services to free his time to for a demanding job of national importance.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,011
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
I would say without a doubt he needs a nanny. Except during his campaign he said “In these times, Mr. Harper’s top priority is to give wealthy families like his and mine $2,000,” Trudeau said in reference to the Conservatives’ income-splitting tax credit. “Let me tell you something: We don’t need it. And Canada can’t afford it.”

Then he turns around and has taxpayers pay for them. That makes him a hypocrite.



You mean lead by example? That's not how the 1% roll.
Wealthy Canadians who are not prime minister of Canada?

Come on. This thread is pure crap. The sort of cheap and stupid political idiocy that resulted in the Tories being turfed. Canadians are sick of this sort of bullshit personal attack.

His campaign comment was about a tax policy for high earners, not how the head of government should operate.

Bullshit personal attack on our head of state and this thread reveals whose ideas are so impoverished that this is the only sort of shit they can fling!
 

silk123

Member
Jun 10, 2002
256
12
18
Wealthy Canadians who are not prime minister of Canada?

Come on. This thread is pure crap. The sort of cheap and stupid political idiocy that resulted in the Tories being turfed. Canadians are sick of this sort of bullshit personal attack.

His campaign comment was about a tax policy for high earners, not how the head of government should operate.

Bullshit personal attack on our head of state and this thread reveals whose ideas are so impoverished that this is the only sort of shit they can fling!
I hear you Fuji, people on this board can complain for nothing, what do they expect Trudeau to do, has anyone been following his schedule over the last couple of weeks.
 

destillat

Well-known member
Aug 29, 2001
2,803
56
48
mississauga
Every other fucking Canadian has a 9 to 5 job. When you ask someone to work 24/7 you as an employer ought to provide services to make that a possibility.

Get over you political partisanship. We need a PM who is always available to deal with the business of the nation. He needs security. Transportation. Personal services to free his time to for a demanding job of national importance.
Really?
When I was in the "9 to 5" workforce, it certainly wasn't a "9 to 5" job. Calls and emails before 9... calls and emails after 5... I'm not the only one... if you think that you are truly an idiot.
My comments have nothing to do with partisanship... where do we stop in your perfect world? Do the tax payers pay for his groceries because he needs energy to do his job? Do the tax payers pay for his socks because he needs to wear socks when he does his job? Do the tax payers pay for his condoms because he needs to fuck his wife to release his stress so he can do his job?
Your comments are idiotic.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
30,404
4,615
113
If he is a such a champion of immigrants and fair wage why is he only paying 11 bucks an hour?

Surely he can afford to offer better than that!
 

SkyRider

Banned
Mar 31, 2009
17,572
2
0
My understanding is that the Trudeau family had these nannies before he was elected! The Filipino community in Ottawa is pretty small and connected...
I wonder if these nannies are on work visas and will be deported when their visas expire? Too bad they can't claim refugee status.
 

PornAddict

Active member
Aug 30, 2009
3,620
2
36
60
I don't actually have a problem with taxpayers footing the bill. But after he stated during his campaign that rich families like his and former prime minister Stephen Harper’s didn’t need taxpayers’ help, what does he do? He hires taxpayer funded nannies. That makes him a hypocrite!
Yup a fucking hypocrite!!
 

stay

New member
May 21, 2013
906
2
0
judge's laughing
It is only about the optics. Most people who seek power say things that come back to bite them. I don't expect anything more. For all the talk it would have served him well to foot the bill. Then he could stand on his whatever and say "I'm different"

could be worse. The president of Ukraine owns several companies in Russia. How's that for a pile of crap... did you hear that oagre.
 

Garrett

Hail to the king, baby.
Dec 18, 2001
2,360
3
48
His campaign comment was about a tax policy for high earners, not how the head of government should operate.
His comment was we should not have child benefit allowances distributed equally, as the rich can take care of themselves.
Effectively, we should not have handouts for the rich.

If you want to deal in pure logic, the PM is by default a high earner with an aggregate income of over 300k (and add his trust fund to the mix).
Agreed he should get a nanny as they do not have time to raise their children. Making the taxpayers shell out for it is simply more feeding at the trough.

You really need to ditch the blind partisanship, and call things as they are. We were all hoping Trudeau could do better, but as the saying goes, talk is cheap.
Given you average 17 posts a day, day after day, over ten years... it may be time to think more and type less.
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,697
21
38
Wealthy Canadians who are not prime minister of Canada?

Come on. This thread is pure crap. The sort of cheap and stupid political idiocy that resulted in the Tories being turfed. Canadians are sick of this sort of bullshit personal attack.

His campaign comment was about a tax policy for high earners, not how the head of government should operate.

Bullshit personal attack on our head of state and this thread reveals whose ideas are so impoverished that this is the only sort of shit they can fling!
Are you for real???

The irony of your post is that you and only you are showing bias and partisanship by ignoring the blatant hypocrisy of your PM.

Any objective person (non-Canadian) looking at this that has no skin in the game would see a glaring problem here.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,011
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Really?
When I was in the "9 to 5" workforce, it certainly wasn't a "9 to 5" job. Calls and emails before 9... calls and emails after 5... I'm not the only one... if you think that you are truly an idiot.
My comments have nothing to do with partisanship... where do we stop in your perfect world? Do the tax payers pay for his groceries because he needs energy to do his job? Do the tax payers pay for his socks because he needs to wear socks when he does his job? Do the tax payers pay for his condoms because he needs to fuck his wife to release his stress so he can do his job?
Your comments are idiotic.
I fully support our head of state having security, personal services, and transportation provided to enable him to function as our leader 24/7.

The only reason you are even debating this point is you are a political partisan looking for a cheap and dishonest way to slur the other side.
 
Toronto Escorts