Now Liberals in power can we legalize the hobby already??

waynward

Active member
Oct 24, 2008
718
52
28
Smurf Village
Yay Liberals are voted in. Harper is out!

So can we legalize the hobby already along with Marijuana. So I can smoke a joint before my session :D :D :D
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
30,370
4,570
113
Yay Liberals are voted in. Harper is out!

So can we legalize the hobby already along with Marijuana. So I can smoke a joint before my session :D :D :D
And it is this naivete that resulted in his election. Let's revisit this in two years when he has done nothing about it and then you can tell us how you feel about it.
 

stay

New member
May 21, 2013
906
2
0
judge's laughing
Yay Liberals are voted in. Harper is out!

So can we legalize the hobby already along with Marijuana. So I can smoke a joint before my session :D :D :D
Sounds like a plan, I can see weed being decriminalized, not a big item. C36 ( again, not a big item ), don't hold your breath, especially with that lungful of herb in ya.
 

Avatar

Sr Member
Apr 25, 2004
324
0
0
And it is this naivete that resulted in his election. Let's revisit this in two years when he has done nothing about it and then you can tell us how you feel about it.
Unlike Harper, the Liberals will not waste money fighting c36 in court if it is challenged, and maybe you forgot Harper was planning a major c36 crackdown if re-elected.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
30,370
4,570
113
Unlike Harper Liberals will not waste money fighting c36 in court if it is challenged, and maybe you forgot Harper was planning a major c36 crackdown if re-elected.
One you are assuming there will be a challenge in the near future. It's probable he may not even be in office by the time one comes up. Two, your assuming the party won't balk. Three, he will pay attention to polls which will show a good number of people in his voting demographic will want to keep it.

And finally as enforcement is municipal and the courts are provincial please explain how he would be able to crack down.....
 

LickingGravity

New member
Sep 9, 2010
962
0
0
Unlike Harper, the Liberals will not waste money fighting c36 in court if it is challenged, and maybe you forgot Harper was planning a major c36 crackdown if re-elected.
That's only thing they won't waste your money on. The combination of the Kid with Wynne could be deadly.
 

Avatar

Sr Member
Apr 25, 2004
324
0
0
One you are assuming there will be a challenge in the near future. It's probable he may not even be in office by the time one comes up. Two, your assuming the party won't balk. Three, he will pay attention to polls which will show a good number of people in his voting demographic will want to keep it.

And finally as enforcement is municipal and the courts are provincial please explain how he would be able to crack down.....
Did you miss this?
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/h...kdown-claims-trudeau-thinks-prostitution-is-a
What makes you think c36 will not be challenged? Or even repealed ? Several liberal candidates said that c36 would be repealed during the campaign.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
30,370
4,570
113
Did you miss this?
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/h...kdown-claims-trudeau-thinks-prostitution-is-a
What makes you think c36 will not be challenged? Or even repealed ? Several liberal candidates said that c36 would be repealed during the campaign.
And did you actually read the article where any money and efforts were to go to stopping international trafficking of young immigrant women and task forces directed to specifically go after criminal gangs and pimps?

So either you couldn't be bothered me to read the article you linked, or you think that trafficking is acceptable as long as you get your share of the young ladies in question.

Nice.

Note the targeted cities include Winnipeg where there is a huge issue with native gangs trafficking their women. But we wouldn't want that to come to light the right? That would be an uncomfortable reason for so many native girls disappeared and dead.

Again, just incredible how naive some are. How they just think with emotion and not facts.

It's right there in your own link.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
30,370
4,570
113
That's only thing they won't waste your money on. The combination of the Kid with Wynne could be deadly.
Just wait for that carbon tax. This is going to affect everything. From home power bills to every consumer good. And it will put another nail in the Ontario manufacturing coffin.
 

Avatar

Sr Member
Apr 25, 2004
324
0
0
And did you actually read the article where any money and efforts were to go to stopping international trafficking of young immigrant women and task forces directed to specifically go after criminal gangs and pimps?

So either you couldn't be bothered me to read the article you linked, or you think that trafficking is acceptable as long as you get your share of the young ladies in question.

Nice.

Note the targeted cities include Winnipeg where there is a huge issue with native gangs trafficking their women. But we wouldn't want that to come to light the right? That would be an uncomfortable reason for so many native girls disappeared and dead.

Again, just incredible how naive some are. How they just think with emotion and not facts.

It's right there in your own link.
Local cops were already handling trafficking issues quite well even before c36, like Harper you are really out of touch with reality! Are you a member of Ford Nation by any chance ? The people have spoken, Harper is gone. Just learn to live with the new reality. You sound bitter that he lost but he won't be coming back.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
30,370
4,570
113
Local cops were already handling trafficking issues quite well even before c36, like Harper you are really out of touch with reality! The people have spoken, Harper is gone. Just learn to live with the new reality. You sound bitter that he lost but he won't be coming back.
Life goes on and one man, no matter what your politics are can't change things that much.

But go ahead and skirt the answer. I guess you would prefer if the women would continue to be trafficked. As long as it is legal for you to USE them I guess the fact they are being pimped isn't your problem right?
 

Avatar

Sr Member
Apr 25, 2004
324
0
0
Life goes on and one man, no matter what your politics are can't change things that much.

But go ahead and skirt the answer. I guess you would prefer if the women would continue to be trafficked. As long as it is legal for you to USE them I guess the fact they are being pimped isn't your problem right?
I answered you ?
So because someone does not like c36 it means they like young girls or pimped girls ? Then you are an idiot if you think that!
Are you that clueless ? Pimping and trafficking laws were already on the books and being enforced well before c36!
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
30,370
4,570
113
I answered you ?
So because someone does not like c36 it means they like young girls or pimped girls ? Then you are an idiot if you think that!
Are you that clueless ? Pimping and trafficking laws were already on the books and being enforced well before c36!
No. The article you posted is about increased funding for fighting trafficking both internationally and locally. It's about cleaning up the dark side of this hobby involving basically enslaved women. That is the exact content of the link you posted.

Whether or not c-36 is the reason I will always support going after the scum who do this. Of course we all want us to be de-criminalized. But until something gives I'm quite happy to see the money you claim is to go after us is actually going to get the scum who exploit.

When you posted that link you implied you don't support the initiative to spend money and set up task forces to go after the criminal gangs and pimps.

So again, either you didn't read and or understand the article, or you don't support that type of enforcement.

Take your pick.
 

Avatar

Sr Member
Apr 25, 2004
324
0
0
No. The article you posted is about increased funding for fighting trafficking both internationally and locally. It's about cleaning up the dark side of this hobby involving basically enslaved women. That is the exact content of the link you posted.

Whether or not c-36 is the reason I will always support going after the scum who do this. Of course we all want us to be de-criminalized. But until something gives I'm quite happy to see the money you claim is to go after us is actually going to get the scum who exploit.

When you posted that link you implied you don't support the initiative to spend money and set up task forces to go after the criminal gangs and pimps.

So again, either you didn't read and or understand the article, or you don't support that type of enforcement.

Take your pick.
You are silly if you still don't understand that by"trafficking" Conservatives like Harper mean the entire hobby not just some aspects of it. If you don't know that you are a fool.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
30,370
4,570
113
You are silly if you still don't understand that by"trafficking" Conservatives like Harper mean the entire hobby not just some aspects of it. If you don't know that you are a fool.
So you are projecting. There isn't a shred of evidence to support this. The law was in place for how long now? And no enforcement at the "terb" level. The statement was specific in the article you posted. And now you claim we we need to infer to your unsubstantiated opinion.

That's what you expected but that's not the reality. I still see the agencies and openly advertising. The Massage Parlours.

And as for good enforcement already I see one hell of a lot of Asian ads that's are, according to your criteria, obviously trafficking operations. And still up and running.

Google Native gangs in Winnipeg. See what they are up to. Then come back and say there isn't a problem.

I want a clean hobby. I want the scum gone. You have your head in the sand if you don't think the dark side is up and running unfettered. It's those scum that make it more difficult for the hobby to be legit. It's them that give it it's bad name.

And to not support full-time going after them with more money, task forces etc makes you part of the problem, not part of the solution.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
30,370
4,570
113
The Tories made those arguments over and over again and they lost dismally so live with it.
Unfortunately I do have to live with it. Fortunately, as has been so ablely pointed out on numerous occasions by those who wanted change I too can advocate for it. Starting today.

Every time Junior fails you can bet I will be there to comment on it. And you can expect a lot of comment.
 
Toronto Escorts