I have to weigh in on this topic. It's been on my mind for weeks so if I don't express myself it will drive me nuts. Basically, I'm casting my lot with the majority. Obviously there's no guarantees, but if you're going to roll the dice, then at least know the odds. Generally, a DDG woman is the way to go if you want arm and eye candy. Candy is good, but not as a steady diet. If you want long term, bet on the GND. There's some support for this, both scientific and anecdotal. One anecdote comes from Mary Ann from Gilligan's Island. Among other things she's still trading on her fame. Back in the spring there was the boat show at Exhibition Place(?) and she was one of the celebs to draw people. She was interviewed on Radio 1 and one thing she said she hears all the time when she makes public appearances is from guys who say 'I dated a Ginger but I married a Mary Ann.'
Second anecdote is personal. Back in uni there was a DDG woman in one of my classes, and like they said in Godfather, I was hit by the thunderbolt. I made sure to sit next to her and get to know her. We did things together for several years after. I got friend zoned (before that phrase was even invented). We never dated in the normal sense (ie: got naked), but she was always happy to come over and swim our pool, accept the occasional small gift from me, etc. Even though she always turned down my advances, hope sprung eternal and I was always happy just being around her.
I left town for part of my uni and then did the backpacking thing, so no more regular contact.
When I was away the empty nest was sold, so no more pool.
My time away gave me more worldly knowledge and experience and when I came home she was on the rebound from a relationship that ended. She was vulnerable and we had sex a few times and it was very good. I was living the dream, but that was about it. That's when I noticed that being with this woman after returning became the same pattern as before. Always polite and appreciative, she was still quite happy and gracious to accept whatever I was willing give- dinners, small gifts etc. But that was it. No reciprocity. It was always me who called her, always me who did the work. And frankly, it was no longer enough for me just to have her around. I became tired of always being the giver, and her always being the taker. One day I just stopped calling her to see what would happen. And perhaps you might have guessed- nothing happened, at all. She didn't call me, even once. We used to talk at least once a week, often more. Now several weeks went by, and nothing. Sure I was upset, but eventually I got over her. Sometimes I wondered what she thought of me, if at all. Quite possibly she too busy being lavished with attention from others to notice I was missing from her life.
One of the things about being one of the beautiful people is that others want to be around you, and they make other positive attributions about you. This is also true for men. And thus I admit that I too, fell prey to a pretty face, not to mention some other impressive body parts. So what this amounts to is that people like this often succeed on account of their looks, not because of a conscious decision, but because they've been conditioned to be that way. This woman told me she got hired for a job that she freely admitted she was completely unqualified for. She went to a company that wasn't hiring but the boss caught a glimpse of her when she stepped in to drop off her résumé and he decided right then and there to tell HR to find something for her. She said another woman was working there too, who was also a pretty young busty brunette.
If these people become conditioned to being given things when all they have to do is show up, then don't expect them to become different people just because once in a while you'd like to be the receiver instead of always the giver. Us regular folk are not treated this way, and so we learn that life is about give AND take, not just take.
The scientific evidence is out there too.
Read this. I did. It was an eye opener. There's one reference copy in the Toronto library, but it's also available from Amazon.
Title: Mirror, mirror : the importance of looks in everyday life
by Hatfield, Elaine.
Contributors: Sprecher, Susan, 1955-
Year/Format: 1986, Book , xx, 446 p. :
Subjects:
Beauty, Personal.
Courtship.
Interpersonal attraction.
Mate selection.
Sex (Psychology)
1 copy
Reference only - not holdable
Summary
Mirror, Mirror... examines the hidden truth about good looks. Through extensive research of scholarly studies and popular culture, the authors provide a lively and comprehensive view of what behavioral scientists have learned about the effects of personal appearance. A wealth of illustrations and photographs give visual support to the evidence presented.
The book explores the view that people believe good-looking individuals possess almost all the virtues known to humankind; consequently, they treat the good-looking and ugly very differently. Mirror, Mirror reviews the stereotypes held about people with specific characteristics and it explains the impact of height, weight, and attributes such as hair color, eye color and facial hair on the course of social encounters. The authors show that through time these reaction patterns have their effect and that good-looking and unattractive persons come to be different types of people. To show the relative nature of concepts of beauty, the authors also present examples of what other cultures consider attractive.
I have bared my soul on this topic. Now I will leave you with a song, appropos of the topic.