Ah. That makes it better. Of course one of those schools was immediately beside another school being used as a shelter.The UNRWA has established that weapon were stored only in three schools....
Ah. That makes it better. Of course one of those schools was immediately beside another school being used as a shelter.The UNRWA has established that weapon were stored only in three schools....
Contrived. Yep.Oh yea....he'll supply the Indian reporter who contrived that whole video about a missile site....
4 days later and 'near my hotel' is the best you can come up with?In addition to the many sources mentioned by BC, Washington Post as well: "It is not unusual for militants to launch rockets from sites near my hotel. "
Sure thing Mr. Ostrich.4 days later and 'near my hotel' is the best you can come up with?....
BC gave you half a dozen more, but really any one of them alone wins the debate. Hamas frequently fires rockets from near a hotel. Case closed.4 days later and 'near my hotel' is the best you can come up with?
The last time I opened a BC post he proved himself so full of shit that I won't bother again.BC gave you half a dozen more, but really any one of them alone wins the debate. Hamas frequently fires rockets from near a hotel. Case closed.
Avoidance of facts doesn't help you win arguments.The last time I opened a BC post he proved himself so full of shit that I won't bother again.....
Fail.Avoidance of facts doesn't help you win arguments.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/gaza-rocket-launched-during-cbc-interview-1.2731201
The report is guessing and has no real evidence.This particular rocket was fired from a good distance from where we were recording.
...Samer, who knows Gaza very well, thinks militants would have launched it from somewhere in northern Gaza City.
Fail is right when you ignore the next sentences.Fail.....
The Washington Post report is real evidence.This debate is over, you've had plenty of chance to provide real evidence.
Twice, I posted all the conspicuous evidence of fraud, and not once did you refute any of it.Contrived. Yep....
I will refute it: NDTV, India's 24/7 news channel, is an independent and highly respected news agency who can be taken at their word as reliable, honest reporters. Their statements are credible evidence even without the video they shot.Twice, I posted all the conspicuous evidence of fraud, and not once did you refute any of it.
The shot of the 'rocket' being fired depicts a different building then the one that's next to the tent.I will refute it: NDTV, India's 24/7 news channel, is an independent and highly respected news agency who can be taken at their word as reliable, honest reporters. Their statements are credible evidence even without the video they shot.
You attempted to misinterpret the video and suggest it could be showing something different than what the NDTV reporters said it showed, as if the video were the product of a partisan agency. The NDTV reporters, however, represent a well known media outlet with high journalistic standards ehi are neutral in the conflict with no reason to misrepresent their reports.
They are believable, you are not. The video shows a Palestinian rocket launch from a crowded civilian area because that is what they report it does. Just their word alone as to what they witnessed is enough to establish their report as a credible, factual account.
Add that to the reports from the Washington Post, the CBC, the Finnish journalist, etc., etc.
It is an irrefutable fact that Hamas fire rockets from crowded civilian areas in order to use hotel guests, hospital patients, and residents as human shields.
Israel's response?The evidence Human Rights Watch uncovered in its on-the-ground investigations refutes [Israel’s] argument…we found strong evidence that Hezbollah stored most of its rockets in bunkers and weapon storage facilities located in uninhabited fields and valleys, that in the vast majority of cases Hezbollah fighters left populated civilian areas as soon as the fighting started, and that Hezbollah fired the vast majority of its rockets from pre-prepared positions outside villages.
Your trying to pick apart news from major news organization is pretty sad.Twice, I posted all the conspicuous evidence of fraud, and not once did you refute any of it.
Words such as this?...
Meanwhile we have the words of HRW:
...
Your attempts at presenting conspicuously fraudulent reporting only underscores your desperation in continuing toYour trying to pick apart news from major news organization is pretty sad.
It also seems to be an excuse for you to ignore the multiple news organizations reporting on the same thing.
Yep, the news is a fraud because it actually criticizes the actions of Hamas etc.Your attempts at presenting conspicuously fraudulent reporting only underscores your desperation in continuing to
promote a completely untenable and racist policy.
Don't want to address that Indian report do you.Yep, the news is a fraud because it actually criticizes the actions of Hamas etc.
Care to parse the reports from CBC, France 24, the Archbishop of Gaza....or for that matter the HRW quotes above?
NDTV are one of India's best media outlets, they have high journalistic standards. Uf they say Hamas fired rockets from next to their hotel that is what happened. Considering the Washington Post says the same thing there is no doubt about it.Don't want to address that Indian report do you.