Because most guys see it as funny - as long as it's not happening to them. Actually I have known many guys to laugh (afterwards) about it when it does happen to them....
We see it in the media all the time. How many movies have you seen where some guy gets kicked in the nuts and it's portrayed as funny...
In England? Got anything more relevant?Not true dude. Women in their 20s without children earn more than men.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2237196/Women-win-gender-pay-war-20s-earning-men-age.html
No problem with that. It's not like the St. Paddy's parade or Octoberfest are fighting for rights these days (even though Irish Catholics marching through Toronto would have met more than a touch or violence 100 years ago - I don't care if they pray to the Pope but they better not rub it in my face :eyebrowsI believe that what ronzodd was saying is that the original struggles of the LGBT2QA community have been won and what is left is a corporate and tourist event. ...
In England.... in their 20s.... without children. It's like cherry picking Inception here!In England? Got anything more relevant?
the pay gap between men and women in Ontario ...has grown to 31.5% — on average, women made 68.5 cents for every man's dollar in 2011. This is the price of inaction. In dollar terms: men's average annual earnings increased by $200 — from $48,800 in 2010 to $49,000 in 2011 — but women's average earnings decreased by $1,400 — from $35,000 in 2010 to $33,600 in 2011.
from https://www.policyalternatives.ca/publications/reports/growing-concern
Wow...dumbest post in quiet a while. The mens rights movement is very relevant to homosexual men as well. After all, many gay men end up divorced with children and face the same issues as hetrosexual men...maybe even more. How many gay men would be denied custody of children as a result of being in a gay household for example. Such a dumb ass post, quite astonishing in its lack of thought. I think you should update your name to be Nobody#1Cry me a river of stupid. You know who else isn't allowed to participate? The 4H club and the motherfucking Shriners. If any of these outfits were even tangentially connectable to pride, or expressed support in ANY fucking way, maybe they'd be encouraged to participate. At least 4H and the Shriners have the good sense not to pretend to be interested though.
These men's rights groups are a fucking embarrassment. The only part of being an underclass they seem to have a handle on is the (largely mythological outside of their own circle) attitude of entitlement and whining they seem to think is part of the territory. Fucking piss-poor excuse for activists of any sort - clowns the lot of them.
Tell you what, sunshine. When you can get the everloving fuck beat out of yourself - or worse - for being openly heterosexual in too many parts of the world, you can have all the pride days you want. Until then, you're just another asshole who doesn't get it.
So what? How is that calculated? How many women are stay at home mums? How many income split with husbands, how many receive child support and live off it or just to a part time job. Sorry the stats do not tell the whole story. Women have more opportunities then men now, its a fact. Get into the workplace and look around.In England.... in their 20s.... without children. It's like cherry picking Inception here!
He won't give you anything even remotely relevant, that's obvious. I will though:
Violence towards men is probably one of the last areas that society sees as ok. Just because "most guys see it as funny" doesn't make it right.Because most guys see it as funny - as long as it's not happening to them. Actually I have known many guys to laugh (afterwards) about it when it does happen to them.
And how many gay men are part of or have expressed support for MRA bullshit? Yeah. Thought so. But by all means, find us a token one or two somewhere. If the GOP could do it in their attempts to appropriate MLK and the civil rights movement, it shouldn't be too hard to attempt and fail in a similar way with this.Wow...dumbest post in quiet a while. The mens rights movement is very relevant to homosexual men as well. After all, many gay men end up divorced with children and face the same issues as hetrosexual men...maybe even more. How many gay men would be denied custody of children as a result of being in a gay household for example.
Why, you're right. It's all so clear to me. After all, men are forbidden by law to stay at home and raise the kids. No, wait. That's silly. It's not law. It's just that they are too important to stall their careers in such a way. And it's not like the wife's job earns as much or is as important, really. Lucky devils! All that opportunity, you see.So what? How is that calculated? How many women are stay at home mums? How many income split with husbands, how many receive child support and live off it or just to a part time job. Sorry the stats do not tell the whole story. Women have more opportunities then men now, its a fact. Get into the workplace and look around.
When a heterosexual marriage breaks up, the women are seen as victims, the men are seen as wallets. Any children involved invariably end up with the mother and the father's role is reduced to McDonald's on Saturday.And how many gay men are part of or have expressed support for MRA bullshit? Yeah. Thought so. But by all means, find us a token one or two somewhere. If the GOP could do it in their attempts to appropriate MLK and the civil rights movement, it shouldn't be too hard to attempt and fail in a similar way with this.
Why, you're right. It's all so clear to me. After all, men are forbidden by law to stay at home and raise the kids. No, wait. That's silly. It's not law. It's just that they are too important to stall their careers in such a way. And it's not like the wife's job earns as much or is as important, really. Lucky devils! All that opportunity, you see.
Why are you making this connection? It's a false one. I'm about to be consigned by my government, if it gets its' way, to be destined to be alone forever. I don't see escorts because it gives me a sense of power or domination or whatever. I see escorts because I'm lonely and I miss a women's touch. This is almost like the all Johns are perverts line right of the Conservative playbook.The opinions on this site on this matter are a bit skewed.
Fact is there are alot of men here who are sexually frustrated/inadequate/cuckolded in loveless miserable relationships or alternately destined to be alone forever.
And there are many who gain a false sense of power and arrogant confidence from the hobby and certainly do not have positive views of women as a result.
Not pointing fingers at anyone in particular just a general observation of the strain of bitterness whenever I see subjects like this discussed here.
True, true. If women had any real wage and career equality, and more men were stay-at-home dads, this would be greatly reduced. Didn't peg you for a feminist, but good point.When a heterosexual marriage breaks up, the women are seen as victims, the men are seen as wallets.
Yes but we are talking about two different things here. Where did my views on the incoming laws enter the equation. Nor an I accusing anyone specifically to fall into either of these categories.Why are you making this connection? It's a false one. I'm about to be consigned by my government, if it gets its' way, to be destined to be alone forever. I don't see escorts because it gives me a sense of power or domination or whatever. I see escorts because I'm lonely and I miss a women's touch. This is almost like the all Johns are perverts line right of the Conservative playbook.
Firstly you have no idea how many gay men are part of the MRA, but the issues are not hetro exclusive. Men are not forbidden by law, but social norms are much less accepting of men staying at home. Only an ignoramus would make a statement like that. Why don't you go anywhere and see who is pushing the strollers. Most women CHOOSE to stay at home with their kids, it is the natural order that has been put in place by nature (in case you didn't notice men cannot breast feed) and millions of years of reality is difficult to change. Also, most women are very happy to be with their kids and chose to do it. But you cannot expect no financial or career hit if you take time off from your career.And how many gay men are part of or have expressed support for MRA bullshit? Yeah. Thought so. But by all means, find us a token one or two somewhere. If the GOP could do it in their attempts to appropriate MLK and the civil rights movement, it shouldn't be too hard to attempt and fail in a similar way with this.
Why, you're right. It's all so clear to me. After all, men are forbidden by law to stay at home and raise the kids. No, wait. That's silly. It's not law. It's just that they are too important to stall their careers in such a way. And it's not like the wife's job earns as much or is as important, really. Lucky devils! All that opportunity, you see.
Of course they do, and most women prefer to work for male supervisors then female. Men love sluts, we venerate them. lol.contrary to feminist propaganda women engage in slut shaming more than men.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.html?ref=science?src=dayp&_r=2&
Who cares if you are gay? - Certainly not the voters of Ontario.I think PRIDE is OUTDATED!!! It is no longer politically or socially significant. WHO CARES IF YOU ARE GAY!!?? WTF!!?? Might as well have HETOROSEXUAL PRIDE WEEK..... About dam time!!
You don't like Pride, you hate Maggie's...are you sure you're in the right business because these orgs should be your allies.I think PRIDE is OUTDATED!!! It is no longer politically or socially significant. WHO CARES IF YOU ARE GAY!!?? WTF!!?? Might as well have HETOROSEXUAL PRIDE WEEK..... About dam time!!