http://www.naturalnews.com/045695_global_warming_fabricated_data_scientific_fraud.html#
This whole sham is just another tax on the sheeple.
BS
This whole sham is just another tax on the sheeple.
BS
Hey, now we know where the Conservatives are getting their "data" from. We've tapped in to their secret government website.I just don't know. I mean, on the one hand, that website and its ilk are little more than rehashes of the same old bogus anti-science nonsense vomited forth by the confused, wilfully ignorant, and snake oil salesmen. But on the other hand, buddy used the word "sheeple" in his post, and nothing says gravitas and credibility like the word "sheeple"*. I'm torn, I tells ya!
*it also says "hey, lookit me, I'm an iconoclast who would never unthinkingly jump on a bandwagon, like, for instance, using some moronic catchphrase regularly shat out of the mouths of lying sacks of fuck like Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh."
It's hard to sift through those piles of scientific papers to find one lone individual happy to buck overwhelming proof to gain notoriety among those who prefer the status quo. I thought I could help.This whole sham is just another tax on the sheeple.
Sounds good if you are a civil servant,...!!!If seven billion humans driving cars, starting industries, raising billions of domestic animals, farming, mining and drilling for oil while pumping out toxic waste is not affecting the environment you must be a moron.
It is an unsustainable lifestyle.
Yep.Reality is probably situated in between both extremes.
Something like the changing of the earth's magnetic field could have a huge impact on the environment. Not just on how solar energy is absorbed but how the earth's core behaves and transfers heat to the surface. The climate is far, far, more complex than a simpleton carbon tax.Earth’s magnetic field is in a permanent state of flux. Magnetic north wanders, and every few hundred thousand years the polarity flips so that a compass would point south instead of north. Moreover, the strength of the magnetic field constantly changes – and it is currently showing signs of significant weakening.
50% because the other half of the day is nighttime when solar cells work really well?Germany provides for 50% of it's energy needs via solar.
They have that covered - they turn on electric lights for the solar cells at night. Voila ... 100%.50% because the other half of the day is nighttime when solar cells work really well?
In reality they have a goal of 35 percent renewable power by 2050, which is still pretty impressive.50% because the other half of the day is nighttime when solar cells work really well?
I have never heard a single scientist say it was caused by 1 thing. I think you're inventing things now.Yep.
My opinion (not that it counts for anything) is CO2 emissions are not the sole cause for global warming. There is more to it that just that.
I don't think anyone questions that the climate is changing. Its changed before. It will change again.
What I don't understand is why there are those that claim it is exclusively caused by only one thing. There are so many variables involved it is ludicrous to think only one thing is causing changes.
To those that throw back the scientific community is all in agreement as to the cause… once upon a time the scientific community was convinced the world was flat too. Just because everyone thinks they are correct doesn't make them correct. Who knows, a few centuries from now CO2 may be laughed at just like we laugh at those who thought the world was flat.
Just yesterday it was reported that the earths magnetic field is changing and weakening over North America.
http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/O...rers/Swarm/ESA_s_magnetic_field_mission_Swarm
Something like the changing of the earth's magnetic field could have a huge impact on the environment. Not just on how solar energy is absorbed but how the earth's core behaves and transfers heat to the surface. The climate is far, far, more complex than a simpleton carbon tax.