It's funny how you no longer provide the sources for your charts. However, here's the chart that you provided earlier, which clearly shows the dramatic difference between the IPCC's actual predictions (the line without the "adjustments") and the actual results.
That shows a five year running mean ending in 2010, in other words its a rough chart that's not current. Even in this chart it barely dips below their predictions, when the latest temperature records are added in a full chart, like the one I posted (from skeptical science which means that you can find the data that its based on for yourself if you were smart enough, each post has links to the original papers there, unlike your lobbyist crap).
And again, to underline how your argument is based off of cherry picking, here's a gif that shows your claim vs the long term trends:
Finally, we go to the IPCC itself, which said the following (Page 15):
There are, however, differences between simulated and observed trends over periods as short as 10 to 15 years (e.g., 1998 to 2012).
Of course there are. As noted by the IPCC itself their projections are long term. Short term predictions, a decade for instance, are noisy, their predictions are more reliable in the half century time frame. Its in that footnote of death I linked to you, as a matter of fact, but you couldn't understand that either. Take a look at the graph of surface temperature, for instance. Its not a straight line, even though its trending up, its squiggly. It goes up for a year, down a bit, then up some more and then down a bit. Just like the daily weather, cold today, warmer tomorrow, cold again....
That's the way reality works. So they make the prediction that the trend will be to go up in full knowledge that it will generally trend up but be squiggly.
Try really hard to understand that point.
That gif above sums a couple of points.
You can see temperature going up generally, but not in a straight line.
You can see how if you start at a high bump and then aim for the lowest bump and draw a line you can make it look like its going down. That's cherry picking.
Can you understand that?
http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/report/WG1AR5_SPM_FINAL.pdf
The IPCC says there are "differences" between what was predicted and what was actually observed. I don't see why you need me to confirm that for you.
Furthermore, the IPCC is completely at odds with whoever produced your un-sourced chart.[/QUOTE]