Bibi puts poison pill in negotiations.... no deal possible now.
- Thread starter Lovehobby
- Start date
I think he has you pegged quite well. I know, you don't care what others thing on TERB.Wrong nut case.
Let's be accurate. This is the kind of material that historians use as sources. Direct testimony from victims and personal confessions from a perpetrator that happens to be a Prime Minister.Lets be accurate. I'll go with historians over letters to the editor.
Again, an OpEd. You seem to have joined LH in a little clique of highschool dropouts who never learned the difference between opinion and fact.No, it's direct testimony from a victim and a perpetrator. Most interestingly, the perpetrator confirms what you've already admitted - Jewish terror groups ethnically cleansed Palestinians. Did the confession by Rabin that he participated in ethnic cleansing motivate you finally admit that the Palestinians were ethnically cleansed?
No, OpEds are not used by historians as sources, other than as evidence of what someone's opinion was. You are stupid beyond belief.Let's be accurate. This is the kind of material that historians use as sources. Direct testimony from victims and personal confessions from a perpetrator that happens to be a Prime Minister.
Actually I believe the Spanish 'hero' he's looking for is Don Quixote.I think he has you pegged quite well. I know, you don't care what others thing on TERB.
Huge difference. Zorro fought for a real cause and actually helped people. Don Quixote just rode around making an ass of himself.
Again, an OpEd. You seem to have joined LH in a little clique of highschool dropouts who never learned the difference between opinion and fact.
Direct experience from a victim and a perpetrator is fact and a primary source for historians. That confession of ethnic cleansing by Rabin must have helped you with your admission that the Palestinians were ethnically cleansed by Jewish terrorist groups.
Direct experience from a victim and a perpetrator is fact and a primary source for historians. That confession of ethnic cleansing by Rabin must have helped you with your admission that the Palestinians were ethnically cleansed by Jewish terrorist groups.No, OpEds are not used by historians as sources, other than as evidence of what someone's opinion was. You are stupid beyond belief.
An OpEd from a very partisan individual doesn't cut it for those purposes. Anyone with a highschool diploma would know that.Direct experience from a victim and a perpetrator is fact and a primary source for historians. That confession of ethnic cleansing by Rabin must have helped you with your admission that the Palestinians were ethnically cleansed by Jewish terrorist groups.
Direct experience from a victim and a perpetrator is fact and a primary source for historians. That confession of ethnic cleansing by Rabin must have helped you with your admission that the Palestinians were ethnically cleansed by Jewish terrorist groups.An OpEd from a very partisan individual doesn't cut it for those purposes. Anyone with a highschool diploma would know that.
This cut and paste fart does not turn an OpEd into a valid source.Direct experience from a victim and a perpetrator is fact and a primary source for historians. That confession of ethnic cleansing by Rabin must have helped you with your admission that the Palestinians were ethnically cleansed by Jewish terrorist groups.
Direct experience from a victim and a perpetrator is fact and a primary source for historians. That confession of ethnic cleansing by Rabin must have helped you with your admission that the Palestinians were ethnically cleansed by Jewish terrorist groups.This cut and paste fart does not turn an OpEd into a valid source.
That is a pathetic clown performance.Direct experience from a victim and a perpetrator is fact and a primary source for historians. That confession of ethnic cleansing by Rabin must have helped you with your admission that the Palestinians were ethnically cleansed by Jewish terrorist groups.
Direct experience is very powerful and always used. Especially when the confession of ethnic cleansing comes from a perpetrator who was the Prime Minister. That confession must have helped you with your admission that the Palestinians were ethnically cleansed by Jewish terrorist groups.That is a pathetic clown performance.
The clown show goes on, still dancing around trying to call an OpEd a legitimate source. Truly you discredit yourself with every post.Direct experience is very powerful and always used. Especially when the confession of ethnic cleansing comes from a perpetrator who was the Prime Minister. That confession must have helped you with your admission that the Palestinians were ethnically cleansed by Jewish terrorist groups.
This has become more about you...
Actually, it's quite an important thread. And the highlighting of this direct testimony from a victim who has his story confirmed by a perpetrator with his direct testimony is a landmark in this debate. It puts so many of the Zionist myths to rest.The clown show goes on, still dancing around trying to call an OpEd a legitimate source. Truly you discredit yourself with every post.
This has become more about you...
It continues to be an opinion.Actually, it's quite an important thread. And the highlighting of this direct testimony from a victim who has his story confirmed by a perpetrator with his direct testimony is a landmark in this debate. It puts so many of the Zionist myths to rest.
Unfortunately not. It's direct testimony from and victim and perpetrator who happens to be the Prime Minister. That's pure gold.It continues to be an opinion.
What does the "Op" in "OpEd" stand for?Unfortunately not. It's direct testimony from and victim and perpetrator who happens to be the Prime Minister. That's pure gold.
What does direct testimony mean?What does the "Op" in "OpEd" stand for?
