Setting aside the 'always' aspect of your lie, when was the last time I took track with respect to the middle east?
Bibi puts poison pill in negotiations.... no deal possible now.
- Thread starter Lovehobby
- Start date
You first.All sputter, no content. Come up with something tangible.
What you quoted is not a journal. It is a blog for a Palestinian propaganda organization funded by the Jerusalem Fund. It is like saying something is fact because it was printed in "The Journal of the World Zionist Organization". You wouldn't accept that sort of source, don't ask me to.As blackrock always does the endless trope that 'the other side' is Propoganda and 'my side' is information, is unworthy. You need to deal with the facts within the journals.
If tomorrow the Toronto Sun said " Olivia Chow is secretly having an affair with Rob Ford" the fact that it is in the right wing Sun is beside the point. She either is or she is not. The source is not the issue.
When a journal says Israel has 20 laws on the books that discriminate against Arabs you need to deal with T he issue not the journal.
I do not go about quoting press releases from Zionist groups and calling them objective fact. I would expect you to question the source. You should have enough integrity not to cite this sort of nonsense.
Of course you are a fraud. You are either too stupid or too biased to know the difference between a journal and a blog post or a press release.
Pointedly, that page is full of lies, half v truths, misrepresentations and other propaganda. The source itself is refuted by several of your previous citations where we showed it was dead wrong.
The criticism of the 'Nakba Law' is pathetic considering the law does not disrupt free speech. People can still discuss the Nakba all they want. The law only deals with government funding.
Come back when you have a 'journal' that has the credibility to actually lists the laws....
When a journal says Israel has 20 laws on the books that discriminate against Arabs you need to deal with T he issue not the journal.
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/05/24/opinion/not-all-israeli-citizens-are-equal.html
Is NYT antiSemitic lol.
Is NYT antiSemitic lol.
Incorrect. The law allows the government to withdraw funding from any non-governmental organization that commemorates the Nakba. That means that organizations must censor their political actions and views in order to receive funding. That's a fundamental violation of free speech.The criticism of the 'Nakba Law' is pathetic considering the law does not disrupt free speech. People can still discuss the Nakba all they want. The law only deals with government funding.
Laws based on immigration, education, public services, intermarriage, segregated housing all enforced by the state.
http://blogs.windsorstar.com/2014/03/11/human-rights-issues-in-israel-need-solving/
http://blogs.windsorstar.com/2014/03/11/human-rights-issues-in-israel-need-solving/
Unless you can demonstrate that his source is incorrect or has been caught falsifying evidence (i.e, CAMERA, MEMRI), then you are without a reason to dismiss the source. The issue at this point is your bias, not the source.Come back when you have a 'journal' that has the credibility to actually lists the laws.
A letter to the editor and it doesn't actually list any laws.Laws based on immigration, education, public services, intermarriage, segregated housing all enforced by the state.
http://blogs.windsorstar.com/2014/03/11/human-rights-issues-in-israel-need-solving/
That's an opEd, twit. Did you even graduate from highschool? Don't they teach people the basics of what makes a credible reference, and the difference between opinion and fact????
Don't bother blathering on, the only degree you have is a BS in Internet Trolling from Linkspammer U.
Evidently he does know quite a bit about credible references. The letter is not only from a direct witness and victim to the racism practiced by Israel but he's also recognized expert on the plight of a Palestinians. To further buttress his credibility he has included a link to a NYT story that documents the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians carried out by Rabin as directed by Ben Gurion.That's an opEd, twit. Did you even graduate from highschool? Don't they teach people the basics of what makes a credible reference, and the difference between opinion and fact????
Don't bother blathering on, the only degree you have is a BS in Internet Trolling from Linkspammer U.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/opinion/oped/Shipler.pdf
Is this what helped you decide to admit that Israel ethnically cleansed Palestinians?
Pathetic. Trying to pasd off an OpEd as fact..Evidently he does know quite a bit about credible references. The letter is not only from a direct witness and victim to the racism practiced by Israel but he's also recognized expert on the plight of a Palestinians. To further buttress his credibility he has included a link to a NYT story that documents the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians carried out by Rabin as directed by Ben Gurion.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/opinion/oped/Shipler.pdf
Is this what helped you decide to admit that Israel ethnically cleansed Palestinians?
Are you EVER honest?
No, a direct account of a victim. What's wonderful is that Yitsak Rabin confirms the ethnic cleansing. Is that what helped you finally admit that Palestinians were ethnically cleansed?Pathetic. Trying to pasd off an OpEd as fact..
Are you EVER honest?
It is a biased opinion from a partisan to the conflict twit.No, a direct account of a victim. What's wonderful is that Yitsak Rabin confirms the ethnic cleansing. Is that what helped you finally admit that Palestinians were ethnically cleansed?
No, it's from a victim of the Israel's ethnic cleansing. It's powerful direct testimony confirmed by Yitzhak Rabin himself. Is that what helped you finally admit that Palestinians were ethnically cleansed?It is a biased opinion from a partisan to the conflict twit.
When you come up with something better then an opinion piece we can continue this discussion.No, it's from a victim of the Israel's ethnic cleansing. It's powerful direct testimony confirmed by Yitzhak Rabin himself. Is that what helped you finally admit that Palestinians were ethnically cleansed?
Fortunately it's not an opinion piece. It's direct testimony from a victim. Plus, it includes a link to direct testimony from the perpetrator of ethnic cleansing. Is that what helped you finally admit that Palestinians were ethnically cleansed?When you come up with something better then an opinion piece we can continue this discussion.
Actually it says "OpEd" right at the top.Fortunately it's not an opinion piece. It's direct testimony from a victim. Plus, it includes a link to direct testimony from the perpetrator of ethnic cleansing. Is that what helped you finally admit that Palestinians were ethnically cleansed?
