RadFem: ‘No Woman Is Heterosexual’

[canada-man]

straight from the horses mouth.. after years of denial and using the no true scotsman fallacies. feminists are finally admitting that all heterosexual sex is rape. and men are rapists. this explain why they advocate programs that "teach men not to rape".




http://theothermccain.com/2014/02/12/radfem-no-woman-is-heterosexual/

To summarize radfem’s beliefs:

All acts of male-female sex are inherently violent.
All women are naturally lesbians.
Patriarchy manipulates women into thinking they want to have sex with men; women’s feelings of “love” toward men are actually the psychological side-effect of violent trauma.
Women’s “choice” in the context of heterosexual relationships is an illusion; the patriarchal system of oppression means that women are always victims of male violence.

This is what feminism is all about: Defining men as rapists, defining women as helpless victims, and promoting lesbianism.

Roses are red,
Violets are blue.
The heteronormative patriarchy



talk about denying women agency. feminists along with their bronze age allies are experts in that field.

 

[fuji]

feminists are finally admitting

What makes you think these are the views of all feminists?

 

[canada-man]

What makes you think these are the views of all feminists?

feminist misandry get more support and is more mainstream

 

[mandrill]

What makes you think these are the views of all feminists?

He didn't say that they are the views of ALL feminists. He specified Rad Fems, who by definition see women as an oppressed population which should "separate" to the greatest extent possible from their male oppressors.

I had the brutal misfortune to work in a "left wing" law office early in my career with a Rad Fem law professor boss. And her views were almost exactly as set out by Canada Man - among the other hateful, narrow-minded, bigoted, foolish misandrous bile she spewed on a regular basis.

We're not talking about the GND who relishes having similar social, sexual and career opportunities to males and regrets that her grandma was not allowed this. Rad Fems are the jihadi crazies of the feminist movement.

 

[fuji]

He didn't say that they are the views of ALL feminists. He specified Rad Fems, who by definition see women as an oppressed population which should "separate" to the greatest extent possible from their male oppressors.

I had the brutal misfortune to work in a "left wing" law office early in my career with a Rad Fem law professor boss. And her views were almost exactly as set out by Canada Man - among the other hateful, narrow-minded, bigoted, foolish misandrous bile she spewed on a regular basis.

We're not talking about the GND who relishes having similar social, sexual and career opportunities to males and regrets that her grandma was not allowed this. Rad Fems are the jihadi crazies of the feminist movement.

He said "feminists are finally admitting", and then wrote "this is what feminism is all about". No qualifiers, hence my question. It certainly looks like he thinks these handful of nutjobs somehow represent all feminists.

 

[ig-88]

i've heard where they want to re-spell words to remove 'man' or 'men'

so, 'women' should be spelled 'womyn'

 

[buttercup]

He said "feminists are finally admitting", and then wrote "this is what feminism is all about". No qualifiers, hence my question. It certainly looks like he thinks these handful of nutjobs somehow represent all feminists.

In fact, he (our own canada-man) was quoting the article.

 

[fuji]

In fact, he (our own canada-man) was quoting the article.

Aj, I should have realized it was a mindless cut and paste, and that the nutjob slur against all feminists was simply a paste.

CM, why did you paste such a nutty claim? Is it your opinion too that these handful of radicals somehow represent feminists in general?

 

[canada-man]

Aj, I should have realized it was a mindless cut and paste, and that the nutjob slur against all feminists was simply a paste.

CM, why did you paste such a nutty claim? Is it your opinion too that these handful of radicals somehow represent feminists in general?

this is what they teach in so called gender/women's studies.

 

[IM469]

Aj, I should have realized it was a mindless cut and paste, and that the nutjob slur against all feminists was simply a paste.

CM, why did you paste such a nutty claim? Is it your opinion too that these handful of radicals somehow represent feminists in general?

Yes CM - I'm amazed you didn't clear this article through fuji first - he knows what we want to read and what is interesting. Obviously the only reason that anyone would cut and paste an article (e.g. Muslim stoning, killing giraffes, Vatican child abuse,etc) is that you support the topic you are posting .... shame on you !

I think we shouldn't just throw this topic out as complete garbage. It could show my S.O. her reaction to me bringing a few additional women in to our bed is a programmed response and I am only trying to ease her towards her true lesbian tendencies with a wild menage a trois, quatre or cinq encounter. I am just thinking of her and willing to make these kinds of sacrifices.

 

[fuji]

this is what they teach in so called gender/women's studies.

Please answer the question I asked. What makes you think these are the views of all feminists?

And when did you take a women's studies class?

 

[buttercup]

Please answer the question I asked. What makes you think these are the views of all feminists?
And when did you take a women's studies class?

Fuji, baby, our man saw an article he thought might be of interest to terb, and he brought it to our attention. Why does he have to submit to your aggressive interrogation?

 

[blackrock13]

Fuji, baby, our man saw an article he thought might be of interest to terb, and he brought it to our attention. Why does he have to submit to your aggressive interrogation?

Maybe because it's what CM does, C&P's an article, often with a erroneous title or claim, and when asked about the content of the article, he goes silent, often because the article or claim does'n't hold up to close examination.

 

[canada-man]

Maybe because it's what CM does, C&P's an article, often with a erroneous title or claim, and when asked about the content of the article, he goes silent, often because the article or claim does'n't hold up to close examination.

how was breakfast blackrock13?

 

[canada-man]

 

[Elmore Scruggs]

Maybe because it's what CM does, C&P's an article, often with a erroneous title or claim, and when asked about the content of the article, he goes silent, often because the article or claim does'n't hold up to close examination.

Why assume the contents of an article might be his views? Why the need to interrogate him?
Stick to being the court bailiff, please.

 

[Aardvark154]

C-M is right on this point - and he clearly said that he was addressing Radical Feminists.

 

[Sophia Sinclair]

I for one have never considered myself a feminist per se and have as much an issue with misandrous women as mysogynous men.

Do I believe that women should receive equal pay for equal work? YES
Do I believe that a woman's body is hers to do with as she pleases and that if she so chooses to sell it for money that is her right? YES

I have never read any feminist literature or taken any women studies courses, but as a woman having lived through many trials and tribulations in her 44 years, some of which could make me hate all men if I wasn't as fair minded as I am, do I believe that these type of women are unbalanced and more harmful to other women than they are even to men? YES They are not furthering the cause of either women or men, as we all have to try to get along in this world.

Fair is fair but their logic is ludicrous!

P.S. As much as I enjoy pussy, I really need a cock to bring things home.

 

[great bear]

He didn't say that they are the views of ALL feminists. He specified Rad Fems, who by definition see women as an oppressed population which should "separate" to the greatest extent possible from their male oppressors.

I had the brutal misfortune to work in a "left wing" law office early in my career with a Rad Fem law professor boss. And her views were almost exactly as set out by Canada Man - among the other hateful, narrow-minded, bigoted, foolish misandrous bile she spewed on a regular basis.

We're not talking about the GND who relishes having similar social, sexual and career opportunities to males and regrets that her grandma was not allowed this. Rad Fems are the jihadi crazies of the feminist movement.

Oagre, will you provide us with a review of your former boss? Or was she ymmv?

 

[blackrock13]

Why assume the contents of an article might be his views? Why the need to interrogate him?
Stick to being the court bailiff, please.

CM very seldom posts his own views as more often than not, they blow up in his face, so it's safer to post article of others viewpoint, but that's proven to be not always the case.