Steeles Royal

New TTC Streetcars Unveiled

GPIDEAL

Prolific User
Jun 27, 2010
23,359
12
38
That is true but the interests of 250 people simply outweigh the interest of 1. And most of those single car drivers really could have driven to a GO train station. Most of them drive out of convenience rather than necessity.

There are a few, like delivery or sales people who make multiple trips during the day who do need to drive, but most of the 9 to 5 types that drive could have used transit at least to get downtown.

Geez Fuji, it's more than one car using those roads and they are not all downtown commuters. Even when I worked in one of those TD centres, I had to drive because I had to travel from the office to a client. If it was strictly office, I would park at Old Mill or wherever, and take the TTC, which I didn't mind using.

People are entitled to convenience. Until heavy traffic becomes a nuisance, they won't switch to public transit.
 

Thunderballs

New member
Sep 18, 2002
2,098
14
0
Toronto
Let me guess, you don't often use the TTC, you mostly drive and never ride a bus or streetcar. You certainly don't commute to work on either.
And your point is what exactly?
 

GPIDEAL

Prolific User
Jun 27, 2010
23,359
12
38
You missed the point. I was talking about PASSING to save ten minutes. About the stupidity of inconveniencing 250 people so that one asshole can pass their vehicle(s) more easily.
It's not one vehicle. It could be a LINE of many vehicles.

Anyways, dedicated lanes like on Spadina where the road is wide, I have no problem. I don't even have a problem when it was on St. Clair prior to the new dedicated lanes, because cars can travel in the same path as the streetcar (which is what I did on the weekend on some roads).
 

George The Curious

Active member
Nov 28, 2011
2,006
8
38
sugar coat the human cargo train all you want, put in AC all you want, you still have to breath the smelly air of the guy next to you all the way from and to cubicle slave farm every day! Off to the country I go, never again to live in the crowded slum they call Toronto!
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,011
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Geez Fuji, it's more than one car using those roads and they are not all downtown commuters. Even when I worked in one of those TD centres, I had to drive because I had to travel from the office to a client. If it was strictly office, I would park at Old Mill or wherever, and take the TTC, which I didn't mind using.

People are entitled to convenience. Until heavy traffic becomes a nuisance, they won't switch to public transit.
Sure maybe you did but most don't. And even you were less important than a streetcar full of people.

I am not saying no one should ever drive downtown, just that we need to prioritise the interests of the many people on transit over the few in cars on the downtown routes where transit riders massively outnumber drivers.

Out in Scarborough where the ratio of drivers to transit riders is likely more equal then the priorities there are different.

But on King Street at rush hour there are many times more people on the streetcars then in single occupant vehicles.

And frankly we need to have an adult conversation about getting 9 to 5 commuters off the road to free up precious road capacity for delivery vehicles and for people who have a business need to drive to multiple locations.

Allocating road space to an entire car for a guy who actually could have used a train is just plain inefficient in a system with little room to give.
 

explorerzip

Well-known member
Jul 27, 2006
8,127
1,295
113
Until heavy traffic becomes a nuisance, they won't switch to public transit.
Traffic is already a nuisance downtown yet many people still drive. My guess is that even tolls, parking levies or congestion charges probably won't change behaviour.
 

fmahovalich

Active member
Aug 21, 2009
7,255
16
38
See here:

http://www.ttc.ca/About_the_TTC/Transit_Planning/Surface_Ridership_2012.jsp

Answers some of reds questions too.

So St. Clair streetcar carries 32400 people per day at a cost of $69k per day versus the slightly less busy Steele's East bus which carries only 28100 but costs $81k per day.

The price advantage on St. Clair will grow as ridership on the two routes increases as St. Clair has lots of spare capacity while Steeles East is already running a bus every couple of minutes at peak.

So out of curiosity....is St Clair losing money? 32,400 x $2 = $64,800. Do we lose 5 grand a day running that line. And I'm being generous. With passes, I doubt each patron averages $2 a ride?
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,011
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
So out of curiosity....is St Clair losing money? 32,400 x $2 = $64,800. Do we lose 5 grand a day running that line. And I'm being generous. With passes, I doubt each patron averages $2 a ride?
Transit as a whole is subsidised in Toronto.

We subsidise roads even more heavily: we spend a fuckload of money on them and charge drivers exactly zero to use them.
 

explorerzip

Well-known member
Jul 27, 2006
8,127
1,295
113
So out of curiosity....is St Clair losing money? 32,400 x $2 = $64,800. Do we lose 5 grand a day running that line. And I'm being generous. With passes, I doubt each patron averages $2 a ride?
Only seniors and kids play $2. Everyone else pays $3 cash or $2.65 per token. The average revenue per ride on passes depends on how much a person uses the pass. Those people only using a Metropass during the work week have a higher revenue per ride than those that don't have cars and use the TTC 7 days a week to go everywhere.

The people that buy Metropasses and use them infrequently or only during the work week are in effect subsidizing those people who use them very frequently. That's was the same situation with parking; Everyone buying a Metropass was subsidizing the parking lots regardless if they used it or not. That's why you have to pay for parking now.
 

pointz

Banned
Feb 20, 2010
683
0
0
Toronto
fuji has a point here. Also with all the smartphones out there, people often miss green light while checking their email or whatever thus causing further delays. I ride a motorcycle and see it clearly every day while stopped right behind them.

Sure maybe you did but most don't. And even you were less important than a streetcar full of people.

I am not saying no one should ever drive downtown, just that we need to prioritise the interests of the many people on transit over the few in cars on the downtown routes where transit riders massively outnumber drivers.

Out in Scarborough where the ratio of drivers to transit riders is likely more equal then the priorities there are different.

But on King Street at rush hour there are many times more people on the streetcars then in single occupant vehicles.

And frankly we need to have an adult conversation about getting 9 to 5 commuters off the road to free up precious road capacity for delivery vehicles and for people who have a business need to drive to multiple locations.

Allocating road space to an entire car for a guy who actually could have used a train is just plain inefficient in a system with little room to give.
 

Polaris

Well-known member
Oct 11, 2007
3,076
58
48
hornyville
That's interesting fuji, but that confirms my view the streetcar is obsolete and this city should get rid of it, except for Spadina streetcar which is for the tourist.

There's a saying by Joe-blow business man, it cost a dollar to save a dime.

Lets assume something here. If it cost $69,000 to operate the St. Clair line per day, then lets add $50,000 to that, assuming that is the amount it will cost to put buses on that route. I am making this assumption because the highest cost for a bus route is about that figure. Assuming a St.Clair bus would cost $110,000, which would be $50,000 more than the streetcar.

According to that data from the TTC and our assumptions, here is the math.

Assume 360 days in the year, at $50,000 per day, that is $18 million a year. Lets round up to $20 million a year.

Therefore using these assumptions, the St.Clair streetcar will save $20 million per year over the St.Clair bus, excluding consideration of the capital cost.

Since the capital cost was in actuality $1 billion dollars ... if we do the math will our assumptions, it would take 50 years before we see any real savings to that route and that project.

As Joe-Blow business man would say, "it costs a dollar to save a dime"

It this TTC case, it costs $1 billion to save $20 million.

The reason why streetcars are on the road in Toronto, is not cost savings. The only reasons I can think of is

1. some people like streetcars.
2. the war on the car is still on going.
3. Tourists.

:D
 
Last edited:

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,011
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Polaris, you forgot to buy a hundred or two buses, at a half million each, keep them in good repair, and then replace them every ten years. You also forgot that many buses would need a dedicated lane anyway.

So your capital cost for buses is a quarter to a half the capital cost of streetcars, but much more expensive to operate. Sure you pay more initially but you get it back sooner than 50 years once you factor in that buses are actually a half million bucks each every ten years.

And this assumes no growth on the line. If ridership doubles your bus cost doubles but the streetcar cost does not, since it has loads of spare capacity.
 
Last edited:

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,489
11
38
Geez Fuji, it's more than one car using those roads and they are not all downtown commuters. Even when I worked in one of those TD centres, I had to drive because I had to travel from the office to a client. If it was strictly office, I would park at Old Mill or wherever, and take the TTC, which I didn't mind using.

People are entitled to convenience. Until heavy traffic becomes a nuisance, they won't switch to public transit.
The only folks who have to drive are professional drivers. You and your bosses shoulda seen the dollars and common sense of having you visit your clients by cab. Just work out the hourly rate GPIDEAL was getting to do what a Senegalese PhD woulda done for minimum wage while you caught up on your briefing notes in the back seat. And he wouldn't have wasted the time you did looking for a place to stash the car when you got there.
 

red

you must be fk'n kid'g me
Nov 13, 2001
17,572
8
38
Polaris, you forgot to buy a hundred or two buses, at a half million each, keep them in good repair, and then replace them every ten years. You also forgot that many buses would need a dedicated lane anyway.

So your capital cost for buses is a quarter to a half the capital cost of streetcars, but much more expensive to operate. Sure you pay more initially but you get it back sooner than 50 years once you factor in that buses are actually a half million bucks each every ten years.

And this assumes no growth on the line. If ridership doubles your bus cost doubles but the streetcar cost does not, since it has loads of spare capacity.

what we need are real numbers to compare apples to apples.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,011
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
what we need are real numbers to compare apples to apples.
I have given you the real operating costs that clearly show buses are a lot more expensive to operate. Which is unsurprising the cost is primarily labour and you need many more drivers.

We know buses cost a half million bucks and need to be replaced every ten years.

What we don't know is how many buses and how much maintenance costs for each.

Maybe you can find that out.
 

red

you must be fk'n kid'g me
Nov 13, 2001
17,572
8
38
I have given you the real operating costs that clearly show buses are a lot more expensive to operate. Which is unsurprising the cost is primarily labour and you need many more drivers.

We know buses cost a half million bucks and need to be replaced every ten years.

What we don't know is how many buses and how much maintenance costs for each.

Maybe you can find that out.
we need the costs of streetcars, installing and reinstalling rail, and maintenance as well
 

explorerzip

Well-known member
Jul 27, 2006
8,127
1,295
113
That's interesting fuji, but that confirms my view the streetcar is obsolete and this city should get rid of it, except for Spadina streetcar which is for the tourist.

There's a saying by Joe-blow business man, it cost a dollar to save a dime.

Lets assume something here. If it cost $69,000 to operate the St. Clair line per day, then lets add $50,000 to that, assuming that is the amount it will cost to put buses on that route. I am making this assumption because the highest cost for a bus route is about that figure. Assuming a St.Clair bus would cost $110,000, which would be $50,000 more than the streetcar.

According to that data from the TTC and our assumptions, here is the math.

Assume 360 days in the year, at $50,000 per day, that is $18 million a year. Lets round up to $20 million a year.

Therefore using these assumptions, the St.Clair streetcar will save $20 million per year over the St.Clair bus, excluding consideration of the capital cost.

Since the capital cost was in actuality $1 billion dollars ... if we do the math will our assumptions, it would take 50 years before we see any real savings to that route and that project.

As Joe-Blow business man would say, "it costs a dollar to save a dime"

It this TTC case, it costs $1 billion to save $20 million.

The reason why streetcars are on the road in Toronto, is not cost savings. The only reasons I can think of is

1. some people like streetcars.
2. the war on the car is still on going.
3. Tourists.

:D
When was the last time you even looked at a streetcar in Toronto Polaris? Many people use streetcars and they're definitely not just for tourists. You're thinking of those cable cars in San Francisco (that are frequented by tourists), but commuters use them too. The vehicles that tourists use in Toronto are those double decker buses with an open top or the long defunct hippo mobile that drove in the water. The TTC also occasionally runs those classic red and yellow streetcars (red rockets) for special events like the CNE, weddings, etc. but they're not in regular service.

One thing that wasn't mentioned is that the TTC was in the process of getting rid of the streetcars in the early 1980's, but a citizens group led by Jane Jacobs, I think pressured the TTC to keep them. So it's politics combined with the enormous cost of completely getting rid of the streetcar are some of the reason why we still have a streetcars at all. You also have to remember the number of unionized maintenance and repair jobs at stake if we got rid of them.
 

explorerzip

Well-known member
Jul 27, 2006
8,127
1,295
113
we need the costs of streetcars, installing and reinstalling rail, and maintenance as well
Any mechanics care to chime in on the relative reliability and longevity of streetcars vs buses? My guess is street cars are more reliable and last longer because they're all electric and have no combustion engine to deal with. Combustion engines require fuel, oil and air filters, belts, etc. I don't think street cars require those things. I'm no mechanic so these are just casual observations only. Streetcars have their own maintenance needs too of course: rails, overhead wires, etc but I still think if we compare the average revenue per rider and costs on a bus vs street car, the street car will be a better choice.

Some of the Toronto streetcars have been around since the late 70's and early 80's (30+ years) and I don't think there are any buses that old still in service.
 

GameBoy27

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2004
12,711
2,606
113
Transit as a whole is subsidised in Toronto.

We subsidise roads even more heavily: we spend a fuckload of money on them and charge drivers exactly zero to use them.
Are you on glue fuji? Of course drivers pay to use roads. There's taxes and fees on auto sales, parts, service, tires, lease payments, maintenance, fuel, licence fees, parking, traffic tickets and the list goes on.

The problem is that governments collect these taxes and fees but only spend a portion on roads and transit. In fact, $2.3 billion of the fuel tax alone collected each year goes into Provincial general coffers.

To say drivers pay zero is the stupidest think I've ever heard you say. :frusty:
 
Toronto Escorts