The stories are in the Star, Globe, Post and CBC as well as around world and even on Al Jazeera.Don't be silly groggy... They are all LIARS. David Miller was one of the best liars because you never knew he was lying.
Of course I want to know if he is a drug addict or not. Crack is one of the most
addicting substances on the street, and if he even uses Crack, he should not be in office.
THE POINT:
The point is that the star/gawker or any other "news" organization should not be allowed to publish such
accusations unless they are ready to provide some proof. Its been over a month(?) since the story broke?
No video, and no witnesses coming forward to say they every saw Rob Ford smoking crack. You would have
figured that if Ford was smoking crack, there would be many guys lining up at the Star to tell the story, and probably
receive some cash for it. What will the next accusation be? That Rob Ford is a pedophile?
Have you never had someone accuse you of something when they had no proof? What was your reaction?
Everything that has come out since has only backed up the initial story, including naming the location and high school friend who happens to be a convicted coke dealer.
If it was faked, all the other media would have jumped on the Star as an opportunity to have them sued in a major way.
And as for liars, sure they all lie, but when we catch them at it that should be the end of their political career, regardless of party.