Swedish Anti-Prostitution Laws Deemed a "Success"

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
26,948
5,065
113
Lets hope Harper doesnt get any ideas :Eek:

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-s...e-games-up-for-swedens-sex-trade-8548854.html

Why the game’s up for Sweden's sex trade

Sweden's innovative sex-trade laws criminalise clients, not prostitutes. The result: a 70 per cent drop in business. Joan Smith jumps in a squad car with local police to find out how it works – and whether Britain could follow suit

I am sitting in the back of an unmarked police car on the small island of Skeppsholmen, to the east of Stockholm's picturesque old town. Above us is the city's modern art museum but it's a dark February night and we're not here to appreciate culture. "They park up there," says the detective in the front passenger seat, pointing to a car park at the top of the hill. "We wait a few minutes and then we leap out, run up the hill and pull open the doors."

What happens next is a textbook example of the way Sweden's law banning the purchase of sex works in practice. The driver of the car, who's brought a prostituted woman to the island to have sex, is arrested on the spot. He's given a choice: admit the offence and pay a fine, based on income, or go to court and risk publicity. The woman, who hasn't broken any law, is offered help from social services if she wants to leave prostitution. Otherwise, she's allowed to go.

"Buying sex is one of the most shameful crimes you can be arrested for," explains the detective, Simon Haggstrom. He's young, black, and his appearance – shaved head, baggy jeans – suggests a music industry executive rather than a cop. But he's in charge of the prostitution unit of Stockholm county police and he's proud of the fact that he's arrested more than 600 men under the Swedish law: "We've arrested everyone from drug addicts to politicians. Once I arrested a priest and he told me I'd ruined his life. I told him, 'I haven't ruined your life, you have.'"

Sweden's decision to reverse centuries of assumptions about prostitution and criminalise buyers of sex caused astonishment when the law came into force in 1999. As arguments raged elsewhere about whether prostitution should be legalised, the Swedish government's simple idea – that the wrong people were being arrested – was new and controversial. Detective Superintendent Kajsa Wahlberg is Sweden's national rapporteur on trafficking in human beings. When I meet her at her office in Stockholm, she recalls that one police officer from another country actually accused the Swedes of "Nazi methods". Wahlberg acknowledges that many Swedish officers were sceptical as well. "There was frustration and anger within the police. People were chewing on lemons," she says with a wry laugh.

All of that's changed dramatically since the law came into effect. "The main change I can see when I look back is we got the men on board," says Wahlberg. "The problem is gender-specific. Men buy women. One of the keys is to train police officers. When they have understood the background, they get the picture." She talks about why women end up in prostitution, citing research that shows a history of childhood sexual abuse, compounded by problems with drugs and alcohol.

"They have no confidence in themselves. They've been left out and neglected and try to get all kinds of attention. This is not about an adult woman's choice." In the 1990s, the Swedish government accepted the arguments of women's groups that prostitution is a barrier to gender equality and a form of violence against women.

What's remarkable is that public opinion, which was initially hostile, has swung round to this view; these days, 70 per cent of the public support the law. "We've changed the mindset of the Swedish population," Haggstrom tells me. The change is visible among the older members of his unit.

One undercover cop, who's been a police officer for 37 years, reveals a lingering sense of surprise when he remembers what happened 14 years ago. "When the law came into force, the streets were empty for six months," he says.

These days he's one of its most enthusiastic supporters, having seen for himself how the number of women in street prostitution in Stockholm has declined. Where 70 or 80 women used to sell sex outdoors, these days it's between five and 10 in winter, 25 in summer. A small number of women work on the streets of Malmö and Gothenburg but the Swedish figures are nothing like those for Denmark, where prostitution has been decriminalised. Denmark has just over half the population of Sweden but one study suggested there were more than 1,400 women selling sex on Danish streets.

The law has brought about other changes as well. Before 1999, most women in street prostitution in Stockholm were Swedish. Now they're from the Baltic states or Africa, and have sold sex in other countries as well. They tell Haggstrom's officers they're much more likely to be subjected to violence in countries where prostitution has been legalised.

"Swedish men want oral sex and intercourse, nothing more than that," the undercover cop tells me. "They know they have to behave or they may be arrested. They don't want to use violence."

It's a fascinating observation because one of the criticisms of the law was that it would make prostitution more dangerous. All the Swedish police officers I spoke to insisted this was a myth, along with the notion that prostitution would go underground. "If a sex buyer can find a prostituted woman in a hotel or apartment, the police can do it," Haggstrom observes sardonically.

"Pimps have to advertise." Specialist officers have been trained to monitor the internet and the police also have access to telephone intercepts, which suggest that traffickers no longer regard Sweden as a worthwhile market. "We've had wiretapping cases where pimps say they don't find Sweden attractive," Haggstrom continues. "Even if they don't get arrested, we arrest the clients. They're in it for the money. For me, this is not an advanced equation to understand."

Swedish crime statistics seem to support his argument. In 2011, only two people were convicted of sex trafficking and another 11 for pimping connected to trafficking. (At the same time, 450 men were convicted and fined for buying sex, including a number of foreign tourists). Last year the figures were slightly higher: three convictions for sex trafficking and 32 for the related offence. But 40 women, mostly from Romania, had sufficient confidence in the Swedish criminal justice system to testify against the men exploiting them

Could the Swedish law work in other countries? Norway and Iceland have brought in laws banning the purchase of sex and the UK has taken tentative steps towards criminalising clients; it's already a criminal offence to buy sex from anyone under the age of 18 or an adult who's being exploited by pimps or traffickers. But there have been few convictions, suggesting that British police officers don't share the robust attitudes of their Swedish counterparts. Haggstrom agrees with Wahlberg that legislation on its own isn't enough: "You have to have enforcement resources. You have to have police officers who go out and make arrests."

In the police car, something happens which reveals the full extent of the philosophical shift that has affected men and women in Sweden. In a brightly lit street, Haggstrom points out a couple of Romanian women who work as prostitutes. As I think about them making the journey over the bridge with a total stranger to the desolate car park on Skeppsholmen, Haggstrom turns to me. "Having sex is not a human right," he says quietly
 

Ceiling Cat

Well-known member
Feb 25, 2009
28,693
1,430
113
I wonder if these new laws have increased business in the whack shacks?
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
26,948
5,065
113
I wonder if these new laws have increased business in the whack shacks?
Actually, after reading some of the comments it appears Sweden pretty much only cracked down on street-walkers.

I'm actually OK with that, escorting should only be conducted behind closed doors
 

Gentle Ben

Senior Member
Jan 5, 2002
7,218
0
36
Actually, after reading some of the comments it appears Sweden pretty much only cracked down on street-walkers.

I'm actually OK with that, escorting should only be conducted behind closed doors
I have no problem with that either . I've always said that no one should have to put up with SW in their front yard .
 

Ceiling Cat

Well-known member
Feb 25, 2009
28,693
1,430
113
I have no problem with that either . I've always said that no one should have to put up with SW in their front yard .
That is what they did in Montreal, no more street business. Everything is indoors. Since it is now all indoors and tolerated, the side effect is that the 18 year old student will do a few hours at the whack shack every week to get the latest ipods and ipads.
 

Plan B

Race Relations Expert
Jun 7, 2008
1,055
5
38
Actually, after reading some of the comments it appears Sweden pretty much only cracked down on street-walkers.

I'm actually OK with that, escorting should only be conducted behind closed doors
At least with the street scene, you can take a better look at the merchandise before making a purchase....street scenes in red light districts hurt no one..not businesses, or city residents

Besides, most of us got into the scene, through the street trade
 

SexSafeSecure

sexsafetysecurity.ca
Feb 20, 2013
20
0
0
Canada
www.sexsafetysecurity.ca
so this law only targets street walkers then?
No, the Swedish or Nordic model criminalizes ALL purchases of sex and decriminalizes the sale. Of course, it is easiest to enforce it when it comes to street-based commercial sex but LE and other regulators also enforce it in indoor establishments as well.

While the article by Joan Smith provided above makes some grand claims about the "effectiveness" of this model there are some major problems with the methodology and "data" that is used to support these claims. Despite this, many abolitionists here in Canada site stories like this and the "data" that is reported as a justification for implementing this model here in Canada in the wake of the successful Charter challenge to many of Canada's current prostitution laws (s.210-213 of the Criminal Code). Further, just like the members of the Swedish government who campaigned for the Nordic model, they argue that such a law is needed to 'protect' "prostituted" women and exploited children from predators (by which they mean ALL pimps and people who pay for sex. Absent of convincing evidence to counter their claim the Harper government will likely support a bill introducing the Nordic model in Canada.
 

SexSafeSecure

sexsafetysecurity.ca
Feb 20, 2013
20
0
0
Canada
www.sexsafetysecurity.ca
Because it is not illegal to sell sex, it is illegal to purchase it.

Sex workers/sellers ("prostituted women") = victim
Client/Hobbiest/punter/trick/man = perpetrator (criminal)

In Sweden, prostitution is legally seen as a form of "male" sexual violence against women and children. One of the cornerstones of Swedish policies against prostitution and trafficking in human beings (the Nordic Model) is the belief that without "men's" demand for and use of "women and girls" for "sexual exploitation," prostitution would not exist. So the goal of their legislation is to criminalize the "male" buyers and decriminalize the "women and children" who are "forced into" prostitution.
 

mrsCALoki

Banned
Jul 27, 2011
4,943
3
0


I suspect you are not focusing on the fundamentals.

It is a paradigm shift. It is not a crime to sell yourself. The only crime is the 'client' paying for it. So stings are very easy and inexpensive to stage.
Especially the agency stings. They can make dozens of arrests in a single day. And they are easy to prosecute.

No I am not an expert. I was curious and checked :).
 

dreamblade

Punster Extraordinaire
Feb 8, 2005
1,440
2
36
in my pants, where there's a party
Well, I was gonna jump on this, but it seems SexSafeSecure pretty much covered it.

One thing I will add is that there is significant data indicating the Swedish model only forced prostitution underground. The main effort was to curb trafficking women from former Eastern Block countries, and it's debatable whether that has been achieved or not. There have been calls since 2011 to end the practice because it's really not working.
 

mrsCALoki

Banned
Jul 27, 2011
4,943
3
0
Well, I was gonna jump on this, but it seems SexSafeSecure pretty much covered it.

One thing I will add is that there is significant data indicating the Swedish model only forced prostitution underground. The main effort was to curb trafficking women from former Eastern Block countries, and it's debatable whether that has been achieved or not. There have been calls since 2011 to end the practice because it's really not working.
Wow I must have read it wrong. In the press the goal when it was implemented seemed to be to curbing Swedish women from the activities. Hence why they say now mostly EE women are the only ones doing it.

But maybe you are better informed :). It was an issue in the UK and often reported on.
 

SexSafeSecure

sexsafetysecurity.ca
Feb 20, 2013
20
0
0
Canada
www.sexsafetysecurity.ca
Perhaps you are correct, but I highly doubt it.
One of the participants at a Sex Industry Summit last week in Vancouver actually provided details of a conservative MP sponsored bill already having been drafted. I believe that the member advancing it was Joy Smith, the same person who introduced Bills C-310 and C-268 pertaining to "trafficking." So doubt it all you like but the past and present actions of conservative MPs relating to prostitution in Canada make it pretty clear to me what the agenda is. While it was relatively easy, in light of tragic cases like the murdered women in Vancouver, to make an argument for decriminalizing/protecting sex workers/sellers, few people seem to be objecting to criminalizing clients (in Canada or internationally). Moreover, it is pretty easy for these people to site the "research" on people who pay for sex done by groups like PRE to support their claims that ALL people who pay for sex are 'dangerous,' 'violent,' 'predatory,' 'misogynistic,' 'child molesters.' Tell me exactly how you think those images will spin when it comes to creating a new set of laws in Canada?
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,768
3
0
I believe that the member advancing it was Joy Smith, the same person who introduced Bills C-310 and C-268 pertaining to "trafficking
While I don't doubt that Joy Smith, M.P. would introduce such a bill, I'm pretty sure that she has "shot her bolt." Even as you state, Human Trafficking has an appeal that putting the "State back in the nation's bedrooms" does not.

Further, although I defer to those actually practicing in Canada, if the Supreme Court of Canada is willing to strike down the present laws, what makes you think that they would not strike down a Swedish model law?
 

SexSafeSecure

sexsafetysecurity.ca
Feb 20, 2013
20
0
0
Canada
www.sexsafetysecurity.ca
But when trafficking becomes synonymous with prostitution, as it often is in much of the mainstream media coverage and the various campaigns waged by groups like the Salvation Army (see "The Truth Isn't Sexy"), people like Smith don't have to really do much to sell the appeal.

The Supreme Court only strikes down laws when there are constitutional challenges warranting doing so. Many of the arguments and evidence that were presented in the Bedford decision date back to the research that was conducted for a variety of Provincial and Federal commissions and task forces beginning in the early to mid-1980s. Many in the sex industry (sex industry professionals, sex workers) as well as people providing front line support and academic researchers identified the harms associated with criminalizing the activities associated with prostitution long before tragedy in Vancouver's DTES, the many missing and murdered women on the "Highway of Tears," the serial killings of sex workers in Edmonton, etc. Despite this, it took numerous lengthy legal battles (Bedford was not the first) before the laws were found to be in violation of the Charter. While it is anticipated that the Supreme Court will rule in favour of the lower court decisions we still have several more months to wait before this happens. Given all this, how long do you think it would take before the Supreme Court heard a case that the Nordic model violated the rights and freedoms of sex buyers or that it too placed sex sellers/workers in danger? Even if such a case made it to the Supreme Court in 5 years, that would be 5 years of repressive and oppressive legislation that would certainly negatively impact the lives of many people involved in both the purchase and sale of sex in Canada.
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,768
3
0
It is probably a safe assumption that the readership of the National Post is rather more in line with the Conservative Party than is that of the Toronto Star. Given that it is interesting to look at the comments on the article about the plea agreement the female defendant struck in the "Maine Zumba Prostitution case," Mrs. Smith certainly has no supporters among the commentators.
 
Toronto Escorts