BBBJ poll.

[Willow Samoan]

I think a similar thread was posted a while ago and I just wanted to refresh or start a recent one due to the bbfs conversation. Take it as a survey for clients. I want to know how you guys feel about bbbj. I want you guys to be honest and candid about this. I have been considering removing bbbj from the list of services. Now I'm very confident in the service I provide. However, there are some people who will simply not see an escort is she does not preform bbbj on him. Some people think that in order to say you give a girlfriend experience you should preform bbbj on your clients, how do you feel about that? PLEASE REMEMBER THAT WE ALL HAVE DIFFERENT OPINIONS AND TO RESPECT EACHOTHERS OPINION. Gentlemen are you happy with cbj? Ladies how many of you feel forced to provide bbbj, due to the demands of the business. Just a side note: If you feel like the poll questions did not address who you are as a client, please elaborate on how you feel and what your expectations are for a session in regards to bbbj, cbj, safe gfe's, the gfe(girlfriend experience) or pse (porn star experience)experience. However, you do not need to take part of the tread to take part of the poll.

Thank you so much for your participation.

XoXo
Peachy/Val.

 

[withpassion]

BBBJ is the only way to go...for me.

 

[petep]

I've experienced both cbj and bbbj and while i much prefer bbbj, it all depends on the circumstance for me. I'f I'm looking for intimacy and passion, cbj is fine but if I'm looking for a hot sweaty romp, I prefer bbbj (honestly, that's I prefer most of the time). That being said, Bibi Jones comes along and only offers cbj, needless to say it won't stop me from seeing her (yea yea unless she costs like 2k/hr) but you get what I'm saying.

 

[avbuff168]

Need another option for 'preferring BBBJ but won't necessarily rule out someone for not offering it'. As it is, I don't see an option that fits my feelings.

 

[Skinflute]

Like Capital Hunter, I am concerned about safety for BOTH parties. I have had my share of BBBJ and LOVE it. Although oral sex is a relatively low-risk, chlamydia can be effectively treated with antibiotics. A large number of cases are not reported because most people with chlamydia do not have symptoms and do not seek testing.
All this to say, wear protection.

 

[Joeybats12345]

I respects everyone's choices but for me, if there's no BBBJ, it's a deal breaker for me.

 

[Willow Samoan]

I want you guys to know that I would never make a decision, just based on a poll. However, I believe to make an informed decision you must have all the facts before you and my customers opinion about this matter is part of the facts. The fact is that I'm on the fence about this. So I will think long and hard about if I'm willing to continue bbbj or not.

I'm also very curious about others opinion about this matter. I guess curiosity killed the cat on this subject. I always like reading what other have to say about situations like these. Thank you to the people who have posted here already. XoXo Peachy/Val.

 

[justjerkin]

I am exactly the same as Petep.

My preference is BBBJ but some if my very favourites have been CBJ.

I would rather have CBJ and great service rather than BBBJ and mediocre or shitty service.

 

[zxc456]

I typically lurk and use this account for research, but I just wanted to add that:

There is really no excuse to demand a BBBJ and refuse anyone that does not provide it other wise. There are extra thin condoms out there, that allow the male to experience sensitivity and pleasure, in a SAFE manner. I believe women would be less inhibited and worried when providing a blow job if hobbyists did not DEMAND they provide BBBJ.

To each their own, though. If you are willing to take the risk for afew minutes of pleasure, then fine. But I do not believe a womans services should be "down rated" simply because she prefers all blow jobs to be covered for safety.

Expecting a GFE to be "uncovered" because you think a REAL girlfriend would provide an uncovered blowjob in a monogamous relationship is stupid. The provider is NOT your girlfriend, she has to provide services to multiple people, and it puts everyone at a higher risk.

And I don't care about who pulls statistics out of their ass about how it is "not that risky" because not all STIs have symptoms. You can still spread an STI like herpes if an infection is coming on. Most people downplay the idea that a cold sore is "just a cold sore", but it isn't, it is HERPES and can spread to your genitals quite easily.

If you REALLY want a "girlfriend experience" then go get a girlfriend that you expect to be monogamous or go to your damn wife.

 

[Joeybats12345]

What happened to respecting each others opinion?

So I'm stupid? I should get a wife? Great first post.

This isn't the rosy board where you want to see a provider because she has a nice personality.

 

[Vs_81]

My opinion is not the mainstream, I personally enjoy bbbj and Cbj equally but during years of hobby I learned worries of stds and their consequences are blown way over the proportion. I know some people wouldn't like my opinion but I respect their opinion too. The fact that there is a vaccination for hepatitis A and B and HPV plus herpes cause no more then some sores which becomes less and less occurrent with the passage of time leaves only with four stds to worry about. HIV, chlamedia, ganorhea and syphilis. Now HIV can only theoretically transmit by oral sex and other three stds can be easily treated by antibiotics, this leaves us with no reason to be too worried about safety hazards of bbbj or oral sex in general. But like I said my opinion may be different then others and I respect everyone's opinion. Another thing I wanted to mention that I have been practicing unprotected oral sex while hobbying for years and never got an std although I vaccinated myself for all the ones that has vaccination available. One last thing I have a SO so it is very important for me to constantly get tested and I do but never had a positive test result.

 

[Vs_81]

BBBJ and services like them are personal choices made by hobbyists and providers alike as which ones to partake (or offer) and which ones to avoid depending on how one sees the facts (or info available) and risk levels. there is no right or wrong in this and absolutely we must respect those choices. which means no provider should feel pressured into offering them.

I completely agree with the above para. I also agree that bbbj is more riskier than DATY specially if deep throat involved, I personally try to avoid getting deep throat done on my junior .

 

[OuttaControl]

zxc456 is the kind of lurker that should be banned from this site - joined this site to do "research", to judge us and our morals and our "perverse" ways - not a hobbiest and contributes nothing to the objectives of this site. I have respect for other hobbiests' opinions but nothing for anything that comes from zxc456. Sorry for the toxicity of this post but I feel violated.

 

[Joeybats12345]

zxc456 is the kind of lurker that should be banned from this site - joined this site to do "research", to judge us and our morals and our "perverse" ways - not a hobbiest and contributes nothing to the objectives of this site. I have respect for other hobbiests' opinions but nothing for anything that comes from zxc456. Sorry for the toxicity of this post but I feel violated.

Agreed

 

[MrJake]

I typically lurk and use this account for research, but I just wanted to add that:

There is really no excuse to demand a BBBJ and refuse anyone that does not provide it other wise. There are extra thin condoms out there, that allow the male to experience sensitivity and pleasure, in a SAFE manner. I believe women would be less inhibited and worried when providing a blow job if hobbyists did not DEMAND they provide BBBJ.

To each their own, though. If you are willing to take the risk for afew minutes of pleasure, then fine. But I do not believe a womans services should be "down rated" simply because she prefers all blow jobs to be covered for safety.

Expecting a GFE to be "uncovered" because you think a REAL girlfriend would provide an uncovered blowjob in a monogamous relationship is stupid. The provider is NOT your girlfriend, she has to provide services to multiple people, and it puts everyone at a higher risk.

And I don't care about who pulls statistics out of their ass about how it is "not that risky" because not all STIs have symptoms. You can still spread an STI like herpes if an infection is coming on. Most people downplay the idea that a cold sore is "just a cold sore", but it isn't, it is HERPES and can spread to your genitals quite easily.

If you REALLY want a "girlfriend experience" then go get a girlfriend that you expect to be monogamous or go to your damn wife.

Did you get banned for this post?

 

[GlavaMan]

zxc456 is the kind of lurker that should be banned from this site

She has been banned!

 

[Celticman]

zxc456 is the kind of lurker that should be banned from this site - joined this site to do "research", to judge us and our morals and our "perverse" ways - not a hobbiest and contributes nothing to the objectives of this site. I have respect for other hobbiests' opinions but nothing for anything that comes from zxc456. Sorry for the toxicity of this post but I feel violated.

Agree, and please note that this was his first post and he is a brand new member. I suspect that he has been here before with the handle "banned". The whole post is a sham. I think we can figure what his future posts will look like.

 

[MrJake]

Funny to say you typically lurk when you've only been a member for a month

 

[too2shy]

Need another option for 'preferring BBBJ but won't necessarily rule out someone for not offering it'. As it is, I don't see an option that fits my feelings.

+1 I'd much prefer BBBJ, it's usually a deal breaker, but will in some very very rare cases go if cbj

 

[MrJake]

Good call by mod(s). He/she didn't just express his/her opinion but attacked others and was very rude and offensive.

Thank you mod.

Geez, I've seen some pretty nasty posts on this site, that post doesn't come close. Must be more to it than the post itself, if anything it was in support of the ladies.