No, it's a case of someone who shouldn't have a gun getting one. Clearly the haze around your head, blue or otherwise, doesn't allow you to see that.
15 year old slaughters his family with an AR15 assault rifle..
- Thread starter Scarey
- Start date
And what has anyone done to stop that person from owning a gun?No, it's a case of someone who shouldn't have a gun getting one. Clearly the haze around your head, blue or otherwise, doesn't allow you to see that.
Im willing to bet you that who ever pulled the trigger is already known to police, has a criminal record the size of a phone book and has been PROHIBITED from owning a firearm. How's that working out? Triple ban and still nothing, surely a 4th ban would solve this, right?
You lose, again. It kind of puts some of the rest of your acclimations in a different spotlight; mouth in first brain in neatral. proof you don't even read the basic stuff.BTW why is this in here? I doubt that a ar15 was used, my bet would be a 9mm handgun.
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/201...ng-family-wanted-to-kill-more-police-say?liteNehemiah told police he shot his father multiple times with an AR-15 semi-automatic rifle with a scope, according to the document, then said he reloaded the weapons with the intention of driving to an area where he could shoot more people
Of course, you now better than the kid.
The laws in the US allows him to have access to the gun.And what has anyone done to stop that person from owning a gun?
Im willing to bet you that who ever pulled the trigger is already known to police, has a criminal record the size of a phone book and has been PROHIBITED from owning a firearm. How's that working out? Triple ban and still nothing, surely a 4th ban would solve this, right?
No shit.No, it's a case of someone who shouldn't have a gun getting one.
Not if he has a criminal record.The laws in the US allows him to have access to the gun.
How many people were killed by lighting last week?Not if he has a criminal record.
9 year old boy sitting inside his home in Brampton killed by a stray bullet.
i was talking about the 9 year old killed in bramptonYou lose, again. It kind of puts some of the rest of your acclimations in a different spotlight; mouth in first brain in neatral. proof you don't even read the basic stuff.
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/201...ng-family-wanted-to-kill-more-police-say?lite
Of course, you now better than the kid.
none, lightning has been banned lolHow many people were killed by lighting last week?
Anti-some-gun and anti-gun is really arguing semantics. Watch this video and then tell me again why the AR15 should be banned. There are hand guns that have 33 round magazines and are used far more often in crimes than any rifle, but all the hysteria, FUD and misinformation from the mainstream media on this topic is unbelievable.Except No one that I know posting on TERB is anti gun, just anti some guns. Not realizing that make me wonder about your sense of logic and reason.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OaZEvb3PWNQ
So then you disagree with those well know anti-2nd Amendment types Colin Powell and General McCystal?Anti-some-gun and anti-gun is really arguing semantics. Watch this video and then tell me again why the AR15 should be banned. There are hand guns that have 33 round magazines and are used far more often in crimes than any rifle, but all the hysteria, FUD and misinformation from the mainstream media on this topic is unbelievable.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OaZEvb3PWNQ
without giving this more thought, if it's true that some handguns hold more rounds, the nra should have allowed the silly ban to go thru. that would take the heat off for a while. everybody would go home happy.Anti-some-gun and anti-gun is really arguing semantics. Watch this video and then tell me again why the AR15 should be banned. There are hand guns that have 33 round magazines and are used far more often in crimes than any rifle, but all the hysteria, FUD and misinformation from the mainstream media on this topic is unbelievable.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OaZEvb3PWNQ
I don't know how many times this needs to be repeated. The AR-15 is NOT a FULLY Automatic firearm. It is SEMI-automatic. 1 trigger pull equals 1 bullet fired.he could have done lot more damage at the Walmart with the automatic...mowin' 'em down! YEEHAW for the 2nd amendment!!!!!!!!!!!!
I think I read that there is a small add-on which is easily available that makes it fully automatic. Are you aware of such a thing?I don't know how many times this needs to be repeated. The AR-15 is NOT a FULLY Automatic firearm. It is SEMI-automatic. 1 trigger pull equals 1 bullet fired.
So sad, 9 year old Kesean Williams shot while sitting in his living room in Brampton. (Hope I got the name right because we don't want that madman to go apeshit again.) Police now believe the house was targeted. No report on whether the bullet was fired from a pistol or rifle.
There is no such thing. You need to do metalworking on the AR15 receiver in order to fit the automatic parts into it. A gunsmith can do it with a machine shop but it requires metalworking tools, not drop in parts. The receiver was intentionally designed to be similar to the fully automatic M16 except that it is made in a way that it does NOT to have space in it for automatic fire components. That was intentional in its design as it was designed up front to be a civilian/semi-automatic version of the M16.I think I read that there is a small add-on which is easily available that makes it fully automatic. Are you aware of such a thing?
There ARE drop in parts like that for the semi-automatic versions of the AK47 and the FN FAL, and for that reason those rifles are prohibited in Canada. Similarly the RCMP recently determined that replacing parts in the FN SCAR would make that rifle automatic as well, and so classed it as prohibited. The AR15 is not prohibited precisely because there is no simple way to make it a fully automatic rifle without making significant modifications to the receiver itself.
Thnak you fort the information. I know nothing about guns but i thought i heard someone on TV mention something about such a piece. Thanks.There is no such thing. You need to do metalworking on the AR15 receiver in order to fit the automatic parts into it. A gunsmith can do it with a machine shop but it requires metalworking tools, not drop in parts. The receiver was intentionally designed to be similar to the fully automatic M16 except that it is made in a way that it does NOT to have space in it for automatic fire components. That was intentional in its design as it was designed up front to be a civilian/semi-automatic version of the M16.
There ARE drop in parts like that for the semi-automatic versions of the AK47 and the FN FAL, and for that reason those rifles are prohibited in Canada. Similarly the RCMP recently determined that replacing parts in the FN SCAR would make that rifle automatic as well, and so classed it as prohibited. The AR15 is not prohibited precisely because there is no simple way to make it a fully automatic rifle without making significant modifications to the receiver itself.
I think what you heard about was a stock that "mimics" an automatic where the trigger is pulled by the recoil, along the lines of bump firing.I think I read that there is a small add-on which is easily available that makes it fully automatic. Are you aware of such a thing?
Its not even close to the same thing and you can shoot just as fast using your fingers.
It's not semantics, it's fact. The rifle is far more accurate and easier to aim than the pistol so is more of a concern than the 33 round pistol. if this pistol is a factor then deal with it as well. Who really needs a 33 round clip for a pistol? It's simply another case of because we can. Why stop at 33, why not 66 rounds? You then can use it at a crutch when you get shot.Anti-some-gun and anti-gun is really arguing semantics. Watch this video and then tell me again why the AR15 should be banned. There are hand guns that have 33 round magazines and are used far more often in crimes than any rifle, but all the hysteria, FUD and misinformation from the mainstream media on this topic is unbelievable.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OaZEvb3PWNQ
