The heart of the court case was about whether Rob was allowed to vote on a council decision that would have personally saved him $3,000. That's where the conflict of interest lies, he voted to allow him not to pay back improper donations, saving him personally $3,000.The heart of the court action is this though: influence peddling.
In other words did he solicit donations from parties that resulted in their gaining influence for a favorable outcome for their business.
Show me proof that this occured. Show me he had anything but altruism in his motives.
As for use of cars cellphones etc by city employees for charitable reasons: if the rules state this is wrong then the rules need to be changed. This typed of thing can be handled with upfront reporting of activities.
Its a witchhunt.
And the other councillors are being awful silent. How many of them and their asst have used city resourses in the same fashion. For Pride. For charitable runs. For private community/cultural festivals.
How many times does the ttc allow the union to use ttc property to seel pizza slices?
Double standard.
That's a conflict of interest.
This new thing is a different issue, and also bad.
Ford should be doing the job of Mayor while we are paying him, not out there getting his willies coaching some amateur football team.
I don't want to personally pay him to coach that team and to personally pay his assistants to organize practices and games.
He's free to do it on his own time, but he should make sure he's doing the job he's being paid for when he's supposed to be doing it.