Even with people calling the authorities it still happens. not cooperating with the cops is only part of the problem.The difference is that the vast majority of white people would have no probem reporting those actions to the authorities.
Even with people calling the authorities it still happens. not cooperating with the cops is only part of the problem.The difference is that the vast majority of white people would have no probem reporting those actions to the authorities.
If I remember correctly the RC church has been sucessfully sued many times for actions of pedophile priests.Tell that to the altar boys.
The comment about the boys was a joke. point is that it is still a problem more common with whites.If I remember correctly the RC church has been sucessfully sued many times for actions of pedophile priests.
of course they wouldnt. what threat does reporting your diddling neighbour pose to you? none. what threat does reporting a gangbanger whose gang controls the area that you live in pose to you? a heck of a lot more.The difference is that the vast majority of white people would have no probem reporting those actions to the authorities.
If that's the case nothing will change.of course they wouldnt. what threat does reporting your diddling neighbour pose to you? none. what threat does reporting a gangbanger whose gang controls the area that you live in pose to you? a heck of a lot more.
what some of you guys dont seem to get is that when you live in an area (or have ties to an area/community) that is controlled by gangs, the police arent going to be much help to you if you get deemed a snitch. you'll be laid up on a slab long before they arrive.
no one wants to see their community in the throes of violence - do you think these people just dont say anything because of some unwritten code? theyre afraid of being on the receiving end of a smackdown!
Neither does any other colour of folks, but they weren't there.The difference is that the vast majority of white people would have no probem reporting those actions to the authorities.
It is actually more of a code. As was with the Mafia back in the day. The police take extra care not to reveal one's identity. And this is toronto not a Columbian city. The Gangs are not powerful enough to control entire areas of the town and administer their own justice.of course they wouldnt. what threat does reporting your diddling neighbour pose to you? none. what threat does reporting a gangbanger whose gang controls the area that you live in pose to you? a heck of a lot more.
what some of you guys dont seem to get is that when you live in an area (or have ties to an area/community) that is controlled by gangs, the police arent going to be much help to you if you get deemed a snitch. you'll be laid up on a slab long before they arrive.
no one wants to see their community in the throes of violence - do you think these people just dont say anything because of some unwritten code? theyre afraid of being on the receiving end of a smackdown!
What link? There was one cited on another thread previously and your statements above would be a COMPLETE misrepresentation of what it said, if it's the same thing. The claim you have to back up is that white people are more likely to commit sexual assaults. I say that's a lie and that there is no evidence to support it, in fact, the US data refutes it.I provided a link i guess the Toronto star is in on the lie.
This is the link claiming whites are more likely to be arrested for sex offensesThere is something wrong I just think culture is the wrong word. But not worth arguing over what the right words is to describe the source of the problem.
But using fuji's idea of culture..... what's wrong with white culture that it is more likely to produce sex offenders, drug related, sex trade and panhandler? As opposed to blacks who are more likely to be invovled in gangs, guns. homocides?
http://media.thestar.topscms.com/acrobat/dd/49/f22a053a43cd98df18c4650f56d7.pdf seee page 8
Maybe this just shows that white are pussies. JOKING
But whites need to answer for their culture of diddlers, druggies, pimps/pros, and moochers.
Or another way to look at things what is the asian community doing such that the percentage of prison population is half of what their population in canada is. That is quite remarkable as blacks and aboriginals are over represented and white are about even.
FC I corrected your post, thank me later.This is the link claiming whites are more likely to be arrested for TAX offenses
So this is a lie, and you should apologize and retract: "what's wrong with white culture that it is more likely to produce sex offenders". The Toronto Star article data does not say that.This is the link claiming whites are more likely to be arrested for sex offenses
I'm copy and pasting the story here because people need to read it.One of the victims was just in wrong place at the wrong time;
http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/art...rborough-shooting-victim-one-of-the-good-guys
You are picking and choosing what you want.So this is a lie, and you should apologize and retract: "what's wrong with white culture that it is more likely to produce sex offenders". The Toronto Star article data does not say that.
What is says is that if you are white, you are more likely to have *contact* with the police in the context of a sex offense. What it does NOT say is that the rate of sex offenses by white is higher than average. The statement about contact can be true even if the rate of offenses by whites is lower than anybody else. In other words, it may be--and probalby is--that whites commit sex offenses at a lower rate than anybody else, but at a higher rate than they commit other crimes.
Basing anything off "contact" rather than "arrest" or "charge" never mind "conviction" is also deeply problematic. It may be, and probably is the case, that whites are more likely to turn to the police than blacks are. Thus you will find that blacks are NOT calling the police to report possible sex offenses, whereas whites are, and thus you wind up with more contact, even if you wind up with far fewer charges.
In terms of CHARGES, the only thing your article notes is that more "sex serious" charges are laid in the Jane & Finch area than anywhere else. That sounds to me like blacks are committing more of the actual sex crimes, but making fewer reports about it to the police.
Man shot at GTA soccer field identified as Clayton Wright
Police have identified the city’s latest homicide victim as 42-year-old Clayton Wright. The Mississauga man was shot dead on Tuesday at a parking lot of a soccer field on Emmett Ave., near Jane St. and Eglinton Ave. W. shortly before 10 p.m.
Wright was pronounced dead on the scene after crews attempted CPR. No arrests have been made. Police believe witnesses left the scene before police arrived.
Anyone with information is asked to contact police
No, I am looking at the data you referenced and showing that it DOES NOT say what you claimed. You have no reason to think that whites commit more sex crimes than blacks do. Certainly, nothing in this report should lead you to think so. It simply does not say that, contrary to your claim.You are picking and choosing what you want.
I agree that nothing in THIS report actually says blacks are responsible for more of the gun crime and homicide. Of course, we know that from other sources, and there's information here consistent with what we know. But it would be a dangerous assumption to claim that blacks were responsible for all of the gun crime, if all we had to go on was this table showing how much "contact" they have with the police, whatever "contact" means. The amount of "contact" is plainly going to have more to do with where the police decide to investigate, than with anything else.That same link talks about blacks contacted for gang guns n homicides. shall we apply the same excuses you just used for whites and sex offenses.
Except that what you said about whites was untrue and a lie, whereas what I said about blacks was true.All i was doing was substituting a few words to watch you take offense when the statement is against whites.
No i have said a number of times that Toronto has a problem with blacks shooting people.No, I am looking at the data you referenced and showing that it DOES NOT say what you claimed. You have no reason to think that whites commit more sex crimes than blacks do. Certainly, nothing in this report should lead you to think so. It simply does not say that, contrary to your claim.
I agree that nothing in THIS report actually says blacks are responsible for more of the gun crime and homicide. Of course, we know that from other sources, and there's information here consistent with what we know. But it would be a dangerous assumption to claim that blacks were responsible for all of the gun crime, if all we had to go on was this table showing how much "contact" they have with the police, whatever "contact" means. The amount of "contact" is plainly going to have more to do with where the police decide to investigate, than with anything else.
We know that blacks are responsible for gun crime from the charges and convictions, and from the people who are actually wanted by the police as suspects, as opposed to people who merely had "contact".
Except that what you said about whites was untrue and a lie, whereas what I said about blacks was true.
You deeply want to believe that everybody is the same, that there is no racialized problem with violent crime. It's just not true. There is in fact a racialized aspect to violent crime in Toronto. Face it.