Toronto Girlfriends
Steeles Royal

Will we ever find a cure for Cancer?

Previous Thread Next Thread
P

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
26,738
4,813
113
There's a simple, cheap, over the counter chemical available that will get rid of all skin cancers within 3 weeks. But if I mention it in this thread I'll probably get flamed like crazy by the know-it-alls, so I cant be bothered sharing it with you.

AFA conspiracies are concerned, regular medical doctors are not in on the whole thing, but captains of the pharmaceutical industry (the guys at the very top) do know about these simple, cheap cures, but do their best to keep it under wraps. Chemotherapy and radiation is a multi-billion $ industry, thats plenty of reason to keep it a secret
 
D

dirkd101

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2005
10,336
104
63
eastern frontier
They are never going to find a cure. After all, what would all those fundraisers and researchers do when they find a cure. This way they all make take their cut.
 
M

mexican

New member
Apr 11, 2005
115
0
0
There are now approximately 260 cancers that have been detected. As we understand genetics more and more I am sure we will identify hundreds more. A cure for "cancer" is essentially asking for a cure for "sickness". It is simply too vast. However a great deal of progress is being made.

Traditional medicine has been aimed at the mass - so drugs that are approved work on the majority of the clinicial trial. The problem is that approximately about 30-40% of all drugs are useless and have no benefit to the individual prescribed - they are not part of the population that benefits from the drug. However this is changing as we come to understand genetics more. Pharma and research is taking a more "rifle" approach and targeting smaller population sizes - as opposed to a more "shotgun" approach. By studying the genetic markers of an individual and the tumour a great understanding develops and the physician can be far more precise in the diagnosis.

As we learn more about the genome there is great optimism to develop better outcomes for cancer patients.
 
B

blackrock13

Banned
Jun 6, 2009
40,085
1
0
Phil C. McNasty said:
There's a simple, cheap, over the counter chemical available that will get rid of all skin cancers within 3 weeks. But if I mention it in this thread I'll probably get flamed like crazy by the know-it-alls, so I cant be bothered sharing it with you.

AFA conspiracies are concerned, regular medical doctors are not in on the whole thing, but captains of the pharmaceutical industry (the guys at the very top) do know about these simple, cheap cures, but do their best to keep it under wraps. Chemotherapy and radiation is a multi-billion $ industry, thats plenty of reason to keep it a secret
Click to expand...

What? You know a cure for skin cancer and won't share it because you fear flaming from TERB. Perhaps, because it doesn't exist or it's proof is so weak that it's laughable. Something tells me you'll get flamed if you don't.
 
P

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
26,738
4,813
113
blackrock13 said:
What? You know a cure for skin cancer and won't share it because you fear flaming from TERB. Perhaps, because it doesn't exist or it's proof is so weak that it's laughable. Something tells me you'll get flamed if you don't
Click to expand...
There are 3 simple OTC chemicals that'll get rid of melanoma and basal cell carcinoma. I had the latter, and I used 20 drops of 35% food-grade hydrogen peroxide dissolved in 30 mls of water. It took 3 weeks to completely get rid of it.

Other products like Bloodroot, apple cider vinegar and iodine will also get rid of melanoma.


See this site for all the cures:

http://www.earthclinic.com/CURES/melanoma.html

http://www.earthclinic.com/CURES/basal_cell_carcinoma.html

http://www.earthclinic.com/
 
O

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,374
2,023
113
Ghawar
blackrock13 said:
Duh, they'll raise funds for and research something else.
Click to expand...
The slogans employed by fund raisers invariably led you to believe that
your contribution is going to finance research for the cure. In truth a lot
of money raised were channeled into expenses on 'education' and
activities not necessarily related to research. But thats not a problem I
see so long as there is transparency about how the donated funds are
deployed which they do provide. What I find discomfiting is that the public
generally has no knowledge about the nature of the kind of research supported
by their money. There is this line of research partially funded by the Terry Fox
foundation conducted by a professor whose biochemistry course I took as
an undergraduate. Far back in my student years I already heard
from the University's media relation and her own lab propaganda about
the promises of her research into drug binding on cell surfaces
and drug transport could one day led to a cure for cancer. After more than
two decades, graduation of a myriads of grad students, training of
a long list of postdocs and lab technicians and publication of a number of
refereed publications no words have been given on how much brighter
the prospect for finding a cure is now on account of her contributions to
the understanding of tumor cells resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs.
One thing that is clear is that she has accomplished her career goals
with her promotion to full professorship and is much closer to retirement
than finding a cure.

Don't get me wrong. I didn't mean to imply any improper
conduct of wrongdoing in this kind of scientific endeavors.
Scientific research is by nature inefficient and it is no fault
of her to spend her entire career just to uncover a few
interesting tidbits of knowledge of academic interest. But
people who has given money to the cancer funds may not
think it that way.
 
L

Lustology

New member
Aug 14, 2005
1,322
1
0
Before most cancers are detected its too late, what's it is in the blood stream it's over like slow poison.

If its isolated than you have a good chance to preserve life but reoccurrence and rapid lethal progression will eventually result in death.

Stomach cancers are very hard to cure compared to throat cancers, it all depends on the type of cancer and the stage that your on.

It's a yes and no answer.
 
W

winstar

Banned
May 22, 2007
813
0
0
Jennifer_ said:
Last week, I was chit chatting with someone.

I was talking about a dcumentary I had watched about bottled water. The documentary made a pretty-significant impact on me and I am a tap water girl since I saw it.

One (of the many) messages the documentary presented was that plastic water bottles are carcinogenic.

So I was chit chatting with this gentleman ~ and low and behold... he is a cancer researcher.

Random chit chats like this throw me into ecstacy - so I picked his brain a wee bit.

He told me that he had already resolved himself to the fact that he'll die of cancer eventually - and he went on to explain how cancer grows and attacks the body. He taught me quite a few things I didn't know in our brief chat.

Yesterday I placed a picture on my Facebook in support of cancer surivers. It was just one of those chain posts - but it means something to me as there are people in my life who I care deeply for who are cancer surivers. Cancer has taken people I love from me. (As we know, most people in our society have been deeply affected by cancer).

A friend of mine sent me this video (which I had never seen before).

Now I've seen articles about naturalpathic medication for Alzheimers patients being more effective than traditional meds (or simply consuming Coconut Oil -which has no patent) Alzheimer's is another disease that touches me personally), I'm a big believer in using marijuana instead of prescription painkillers to deal with pain.... (it's not my cup of tea for recreational use but you better believe I'll make people I love give it a try if and when they are dealing with chronic pain instead of keeping mum when they are prescribed stuff like Oxy - well The replacement Oxy - whatever it's called....). Someone close to me recently had open heart surgery and I worry about what meds he's taking.... I don't trust Drug companies at all....

I've wanted to see a naturalpathic doctor for a long time... I'm skeptical about everything lately - especially when it comes to healthcare and food.

It's starting to really really depress me :(

The cancer reasearcher who I spoke with told me he didn't believe we'd ever find a cure for cancer because it's so difficult to pinpoint what causes cancer in an individual. He told me it takes 25 years for cancer to grow to the point of detection. I trust his opinion. But when I see a clip like this I can't help but question him, the government, doctors, etc. etc. etc.....

What do you think? Is there something we can do other than rely on those who are funded by the government (who may not be open to all options) or drug companies (who obviously are motivated by profit)? Am I turning into a conspiracy theorist who needs to stop paying attention to this kinda stuff?? (lol).

.... I'm sincerely interested in hearing what other people think. I want to do something - if not now - someday....

Click to expand...
Yes we will. We're entering a new age of medicine. Many new and exciting things are about to happen. The question is who will get there first, The Canadians, The Americans, The Russians, The Chinese, or the Brits. I'd say within the next 20 years or so, we're going to be laughing at cancers once thought unbeatable. An arrogant assumption, but with everything going so quickly, we will. We may even be able to reverse aging and send us physically and mentally back to our young twenties, once we have cancer meds in place. There's some amazing science being done in this area, it's just not talked about.

One interesting one is taking your immune cells, growing lots of them up, and then reinjecting them back into your body at the tumour site, and the cells just attack the tumour like gangbusters. without side effects. That's just one area of research. There are many really good ones right now. In fact one Harvard researcher did an analysis and predicts with all of our current technologies, if they were employed properly today, the average lifespan would be about 300 years old.
 
B

blackrock13

Banned
Jun 6, 2009
40,085
1
0
oil&gas said:
The slogans employed by fund raisers invariably led you to believe that
your contribution is going to finance research for the cure. In truth a lot
of money raised were channeled into expenses on 'education' and
activities not necessarily related to research. But thats not a problem I
see so long as there is transparency about how the donated funds are
deployed which they do provide. What I find discomfiting is that the public
generally has no knowledge about the nature of the kind of research supported
by their money. There is this line of research partially funded by the Terry Fox
foundation conducted by a professor whose biochemistry course I took as
an undergraduate. Far back in my student years I already heard
from the University's media relation and her own lab propaganda about
the promises of her research into drug binding on cell surfaces
and drug transport could one day led to a cure for cancer. After more than
two decades, graduation of a myriads of grad students, training of
a long list of postdocs and lab technicians and publication of a number of
refereed publications no words have been given on how much brighter
the prospect for finding a cure is now on account of her contributions to
the understanding of tumor cells resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs.
One thing that is clear is that she has accomplished her career goals
with her promotion to full professorship and is much closer to retirement
than finding a cure.

Don't get me wrong. I didn't mean to imply any improper
conduct of wrongdoing in this kind of scientific endeavors.
Scientific research is by nature inefficient and it is no fault
of her to spend her entire career just to uncover a few
interesting tidbits of knowledge of academic interest. But
people who has given money to the cancer funds may not
think it that way.
Click to expand...

Much of that is realized by the educated donor.
 
P

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
26,738
4,813
113
Also Laetrile (vit. B17) is know to cure most cancers within a few weeks

 
B

blackrock13

Banned
Jun 6, 2009
40,085
1
0
What I know about Essiac tea is that it's usually used in conjunction with the tradition treatments and acts an immune booster. I've not heard of it being successful on it's own. The first thing that comes to mind when I hear Laetrile is cyanide and I know it's not as effective as you try to make us think. Steve McQueen had the laetrile course of treatments and still died. His story is not unique.
 
U

userz

Member
Nov 5, 2005
758
0
16
Phil C. McNasty
Even though laetrile has been banned in the US, you can still buy it online.

Its sold under its other name 'Amygdalin': http://www.luckyvitamin.com/p-174579...e=google_base&
Click to expand...

Give me an f'n break, you're not going to find a cure for cancer on some hippie's website. Maybe you shouldn't be getting your information from quacky videos from the 1970's where the narrator uses terms like "organized medicine". I stopped watching your laetrile video at that point. There's no illuminati conspiracy to keep cures for cancers under wraps...
 
U

userz

Member
Nov 5, 2005
758
0
16
blackrock13 said:
With what happened lately with spammers on TERB, do you honestly think anyones going to click on your link?
Click to expand...
The cures for cancers are all listed on his website no doubt. He'll be banned any minute now for running afoul of "organized medicine"
 
L

lovelatinas

Retired
Sep 30, 2008
6,677
1
38
A cure for cancer would but the pharmaceutical companies out of business. That's why the USDA government won't approve it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Ashley Madison
Previous Thread Next Thread
Toronto Escorts
Top Bottom