DNA confirms australian rAboriginal culture Earth's oldest

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,483
4,902
113
DNA confirms Aboriginal culture Earth's oldest

By:AG Staff with AAP | September-23-2011

The first Aboriginal genome sequence confirms Australia's native people left Africa 75,000 years ago.

Aboriginal Australians are the oldest continuous culture on Earth, confirms a new genetic study. (Credit: Getty Images)

ABORIGINAL AUSTRALIANS ARE descendents of the first people to leave Africa up to 75,000 years ago, a genetic study has found, confirming they have the oldest continuous culture on the planet.

Professor Eske Willerslev of the University of Copenhagen, who led the study, says Aboriginal Australians were the first modern human to travel over unknown territory in Asia and Australia. "It was a truly amazing journey that must have demanded exceptional survival skills and guts," he says.

A century-old lock of hair, given by a West Australian indigenous man to an anthropologist, has led to the discovery that ancestors of Aboriginal Australians reached Asia at least 24,000 years before another wave of migration that populated Europe and Asia.

Experts from the University of Western Australia (UWA) and Murdoch University were part of an international team that analysed DNA from the hair, and found no hereditary material from European immigrants to Australia. This made the man's DNA a perfect candidate for looking at the history of Aboriginal migration.
Aboriginal Australians first to cross Asia
Studying his DNA, the researchers found that the ancestors of Australian Aboriginals had split from the first modern human populations to leave Africa, 64,000 to 75,000 years ago. Dr Joe Dortch, a scientist at UWA, says the discovery turns on its head the existing theory that Aboriginals arrived here less than 50,000 years ago. The findings are detailed today in the journal Science.

"[The discovery] strongly supports the idea that Aborigines were [part of] an early and separate wave of human expansion out of Africa, before the subsequent wave that established Europeans and Asians," says Professor Alan Cooper, director of the Australian Centre for Ancient DNA at the University of Adelaide. "However, while this is a major step forward, the key unresolved question remains the unique story of Aboriginal history within Australia."

"This new DNA study powerfully confirms that Aboriginal Australians are one of the oldest living populations in the world, certainly the oldest outside of Africa," agrees evolutionary biologist Professor Darren Curnoe of UNSW. "Australians are truly one of the world's great human populations and a very ancient one at that, with deep connections to the Australian continent and broader Asian region. About this now there can be no dispute."
Oldest living population in the world
In another study, in the American Journal of Human Genetics, researchers found that when these ancestors of Aboriginals crossed through Asia, they may have interbred with Siberian people known as the Denisovans.

For that study, DNA was extracted from a finger bone excavated in the freezing temperatures of Siberia to analyse the migration of people to tropical parts of Asia and Australia more than 40,000 years ago.

Examining DNA from the finger, researchers from the Harvard Medical School in the US and the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Germany concluded that the Denisovans - a primitive group of humans descended from Neanderthals - migrated from Siberia to tropical parts of Asia. They contributed DNA to Aborigines along with present-day New Guineans and an indigenous tribe in the Philippines known as Mamanwa.
Aboriginal people had Siberian ancestors
To make the link between the Denisovans and indigenous Australians, the study looked at two Aboriginal populations, one of which was from the Northern Territory. The researchers concluded that Denisovans interbred with modern humans in South-East Asia 44,000 years ago, before Australia separated from Papua New Guinea.

"This paper helped fill in some empty pieces in the evolutionary puzzle that began after early humans left Africa, and reinforces the view that humans have intermixed throughout history," say the scientists behind the research in a summary of the findings.

"The study also confirms controversial claims that the ancestors of all living Eurasians interbred with the Neandertals, while past Asians/Oceanians also mated with the mysterious ancient humans from Denisova cave in Siberia," comments Darren from UNSW. "This is clear and independent validation of DNA work on both these extinct humans [the Neanderthals and the Denisovans], confirming today's other big announcement about their deep connections to Australians and other indigenous people in our region."
 

Petzel

New member
Jul 4, 2011
6,623
3
0
Vaughan
Yes they are the first continuing species but not the first original homo sapiens or homo erectus. At one time in earth's past all the continents were joined making it possible for these peoples to migrate over into what would become another continent in later times as the land masses separated and the continents originated. But almost all anthrolopoligists today agree that human life began in what is now Africa.
 

blackram

Banned
Jul 31, 2008
706
1
0
One of the differences between the spread of homo sapiens, and the spread of our ancestor species, like homo erectus, is that homo erectus spread all throughout the world upto the point where there was a water barrier that they couldn't walk around (oceans). That limited home erectus to the connected continents of Africa, Europe and Asia. Homo Sapiens were the first to cross large bodies of water to places like Australia, New Zealand, Hawaii, North/South America.

So that would make homo sapiens the first boat-building species (and eventually the first spacecraft building species too, 75000 years later).
 

Boss Nass

Well-known member
Jun 7, 2002
5,983
14,164
113
Hopefully with my face in a pussy
Yes they are the first continuingAt one time in earth's past all the continents were joined making it possible for these peoples to migrate over into what would become another continent in later times as the land masses separated and the continents originated.
Not a chance. Continental drift began millions of years before apes evolved, let alone the genus Homo.
 

blackrock13

Banned
Jun 6, 2009
40,084
1
0
Yes they are the first continuing species but not the first original homo sapiens or homo erectus. At one time in earth's past all the continents were joined making it possible for these peoples to migrate over into what would become another continent in later times as the land masses separated and the continents originated. But almost all anthrolopoligists today agree that human life began in what is now Africa.
The continents had long since separated before homo anything became a fact. The Australian migration was made possible in large part by the fact that oceanic water level were high enough that the gap between SE asian and the Australian continent was only 60-80km and not the usual 600-800 kms, making it quite doable by primitive rafts. The Ice Bridges between Europe and NA as well as Asia and NA could be crossed on foot but also by primitive water craft, especially the North Atlantic bridge. With the discovery of remains in SA, it felt that rapid expansion south to Chile and Peru in the western hemisphere could have been aided by a realization that watercraft could make the trip down the west coast easier/quicker, with fish and game crowded along the coast and tidal waters, bypassing the still substantial ice mass on the land.
 

rld

New member
Oct 12, 2010
10,664
2
0
Yes they are the first continuing species but not the first original homo sapiens or homo erectus. At one time in earth's past all the continents were joined making it possible for these peoples to migrate over into what would become another continent in later times as the land masses separated and the continents originated. But almost all anthrolopoligists today agree that human life began in what is now Africa.
Aboriginals are not a species. I am not even sure culture, the word in the article is the correct term.

There are still some timing issues to be worked out but this is interesting stuff.
 

FatOne

Banned
Nov 20, 2006
3,474
1
0
Also culture and genetics are two different things. If not then the racists are correct.
 

fmahovalich

Active member
Aug 21, 2009
7,256
16
38
70-80 km...vs.... 700-800 km....

COME ON!!

ARE YOU SERIOUS?????

in the last 75,000 years...... pfffshhhaaww
 

Questor

New member
Sep 15, 2001
4,548
1
0
Yes they are the first continuing species but not the first original homo sapiens or homo erectus.
Great interpretation of the article. I didn't even realize that Australian Aboriginals were a separate species. I feel really dumb now. Thanks for enlightening us.
 

papasmerf

New member
Oct 22, 2002
26,531
0
0
42.55.65N 78.43.73W
I was once married to Satan's sister.

She would be older
 

papasmerf

New member
Oct 22, 2002
26,531
0
0
42.55.65N 78.43.73W
Great interpretation of the article. I didn't even realize that Australian Aboriginals were a separate species. I feel really dumb now. Thanks for enlightening us.
Yes, they are not human according to whom????
 

GG2

Mr. Debonair
Apr 8, 2011
3,183
0
0
That's all very interesting, but more importantly, how do Aboriginals stack up in terms of penis size?

Much has been said about other groups. For e.g.

"It is generally said that the penis of the Negro is very large," so
wrote German anthropologist Johann Friedrich Blumenbach in 1795. "And
this assertion is so far borne out by the remarkable genitory
apparatus of an Ethiopian which I have in my anatomical collection."
Louis Jacolliet, a 19th century French writer who spent three decades
investigating penis size, had this to say: "In no branch of the human
race are the male organs more developed than in the African Negro."


 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts