Discreet Dolls

1967 Borders and The Palestinian scam

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,011
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Memri is certainly a biased organization ali, but on the other hand, those were original sources materials he was providing you, that just happen to be hosted there.

I think you're just hoping to avoid responding to the actual evidence that basketcase provided that pretty clearly indicts Hamas.
 

ali90

New member
Apr 19, 2011
2,688
0
0
That sign was put up by some whack jobs, not by the Israel government. Israel has lots of beaches with women in tiny bikinis, and women walking around everywhere in low cut shirts, short skirts, tight pants, whatever. The whack jobs don't go to those places, and they've secluded themselves into one little area and ASKED others to respect that. No law in Israel requires you to respect that--you could organize a "slut walk" through their area and you would have a right to do that--the police would no doubt deploy to contain the violence that would no doubt result--but you would have that right in Israel. You would NOT have that right in Gaza City. Hamas would kill you, if you tried to organize a "slut walk" there.

Most people would probably respect the wishes of the whack jobs, who have made it pretty easy to avoid going through their area really. You don't HAVE to, you can be an asshole if you want, but why would you want to? It's a lot easier to respect their wishes and wear your short skirt and tight pants in your own neighbourhood, and not make a point of parading through theirs.

Except that you do have a right to wear whatever you want in Israel. So you are just flat out wrong.

So you are saying that there are 'whackjobs' in Israel too? Well I like to call them Orthodox Jews because that's who they are. Practicing a fundamental form of their religion is not a crime and they are definitely NOT 'whackjobs'. I posted that video to let people know that fundamentalists exist on both sides. However, what I find humorous is you bashing on people who are practicing either strict religion or fighting for their freedom, without little or no idea about them!

I also didn't see you write about other things that I brought up. Israel ban on Nakba day? Mordechai Vanunu? Israeli WMD's? State sponsored kidnapping? Arab Israeli citizens considered as second-grade citizens? What do you think about that fuji?

Hey fuji, let grog and ali complain about the evils of Israel while staying quiet on how things are in the rest of the middle east (thousands killed in Syria, Libya, the woman arrested for daring to drive). After all, Israel has its vices such as religious freedoms while the rest just have oppression and corruption which are nowhere near as evil.
I would like you to quote where have I said that other middle eastern countries are 'better'? I have accepted that oppression and corruption exists in every country in the Middle East, but you cannot just assume that Israel is the supreme example of religious freedom and a just state. That is plain wrong! Sorry to see that just like MEMRI, basketcase seems to contort words and meanings to suit his statements.
 

ali90

New member
Apr 19, 2011
2,688
0
0
Memri is certainly a biased organization ali, but on the other hand, those were original sources materials he was providing you, that just happen to be hosted there.

I think you're just hoping to avoid responding to the actual evidence that basketcase provided that pretty clearly indicts Hamas.
The funny thing is, that I've studied and learnt Arabic. So I can tell you, that the translation does not match what the person is speaking. I've probably gone through atleast half of MEMRI's website during my masters level research for my paper on Crisis in the Middle East and I could not use the website to cite or source anything because it was plain garbage. Some of the people who I knew used the website held the same view, oh and two of them were ARABIC speaking Jews. And how come if this was indeed a reputable research institute, why does nobody in Israeli universities use it? I was in Tel-Aviv, some years ago and this PhD candidate himself told me about the imminent bias and extreme contortion of words in MEMRI translations. It twists the word and meaning of the sentence completely.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,011
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Ali, at the end of the day, his point is still there - it's not hard to find outrageous statements from Hamas. When that pregnant woman was killed Hamas put up a note on their website praising her killers as Palestinian heroes.

You can stamp your feet and shout but there is a very good reason why Canada has labelled Hamas a terrorist organization, and it is not just memri propaganda. Hamas brag about their terrorist acts.
 

groggy

Banned
Mar 21, 2011
15,262
0
0
Very entertaining.

On the one hand we have direct answers from Hamas spokesman in English in the Globe, and on the other hand we have purposely mistranslated speeches.
Which one sounds more reasonable today?

Oh, and Fuji.
Nice try with your comment about the West Bank not being part of Israel. Every country in the world, including the the US and the UN, refer to the West Bank as the Occupied Territories of Palestine, occupied and controlled by Israel. The study giving Israel the same religious freedom as Afghanistan is correct. Burning synagogues and mosques is not a sign of religious freedom.
 

ali90

New member
Apr 19, 2011
2,688
0
0
Ali, at the end of the day, his point is still there - it's not hard to find outrageous statements from Hamas. When that pregnant woman was killed Hamas put up a note on their website praising her killers as Palestinian heroes.

You can stamp your feet and shout but there is a very good reason why Canada has labelled Hamas a terrorist organization, and it is not just memri propaganda. Hamas brag about their terrorist acts.

Why do you keep going off on a tangent? You haven't responded about "Israel ban on Nakba day? Mordechai Vanunu? Israeli WMD's? State sponsored kidnapping? Arab Israeli citizens considered as second-grade citizens?"

Just because 'big brother' has put a label on someone, doesn't mean I should follow the herd mentality that you are suffering from and not use my own brain to research, understand and contemplate my own ideas. However, I'm not saying that what Hamas is doing is justified.

And at the end of the day his point isn't anywhere but the gutters if it's based on lies by a biased media (MEMRI) which is bashed upon consistently by reputable media institutes.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,011
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
So you are saying that there are 'whackjobs' in Israel too? Well I like to call them Orthodox Jews because that's who they are. Practicing a fundamental form of their religion is not a crime and they are definitely NOT 'whackjobs'. I posted that video to let people know that fundamentalists exist on both sides.
No you didn't. You posted the video to challenge my claim that the Israeli guarantees freedom to its citizens. In that respect you failed, because your video shows the Israeli state upholding the freedoms of that journalist.

And I'm not sure what your laundry list is supposed to represents: "Israel ban on Nakba day? Mordechai Vanunu? Israeli WMD's? State sponsored kidnapping? Arab Israeli citizens considered as second-grade citizens?"

What do I think of that? I think you are making shit up again. Israel has not banned Nakba day, does not sponsor kidnappings, and Arab Israeli citizens are not considered second-grade citizens. I'm sure, though, that you will take some irrelevant detail and misrepresent it as implying those things are true--your position seems to rely extensively on misrepresentation. For example, misrepresenting the behavior of some fundamentalist whack jobs as implying that the Israeli state itself does not respect freedom.

Let's see, will you misrepresent crackdowns of violence on Nakba day as a ban? Will you misrepresent immigration policy or policy in the West Bank or Gaza as if it impinged Israeli Arab citizen's rights? I bet you will. You love those sorts of misrepresentations.

As for Israeli WMD's my concern is with countries that might turn their WMD's over to terrorists, such as Iran or Pakistan. I have no concern whatsoever that Israeli WMD's would wind up in the wrong hands. I'm generally against proliferation of nuclear weapons, but I don't really see a big problem here. Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism. Israel is not.

I would like you to quote where have I said that other middle eastern countries are 'better'?
You've made the false assertion that Israel is somehow equivalent to those countries, when in reality Israeli is a strong democracy that provides firm guarantees of freedom to all of its citizens. None of the other countries in that region come even close. Not only do they persecute non-Muslim citizens routinely, but they don't even provide their Muslim citizens with guaranteed rights as firmly as Israel does.

In comparing Israel to those countries you insult democracy.
 

groggy

Banned
Mar 21, 2011
15,262
0
0
In comparing Israel to those countries you insult democracy.
And you try to insult our intelligence.

The video shows a country where you need police protection if you go in orthodox areas, a country where synagogues and mosques are torched. A country where the laws may say they support freedom of religion, but police action says otherwise, as shown in the video.

That is why Israel is rated with as much religious freedom as Afghanistan, as shown through previously linked study, based on social conditions.
 

ali90

New member
Apr 19, 2011
2,688
0
0
No you didn't. You posted the video to challenge my claim that the Israeli guarantees freedom to its citizens. In that respect you failed, because your video shows the Israeli state upholding the freedoms of that journalist.

And I'm not sure what your laundry list is supposed to represents: "Israel ban on Nakba day? Mordechai Vanunu? Israeli WMD's? State sponsored kidnapping? Arab Israeli citizens considered as second-grade citizens?"

What do I think of that? I think you are making shit up again. Israel has not banned Nakba day, does not sponsor kidnappings, and Arab Israeli citizens are not considered second-grade citizens. I'm sure, though, that you will take some irrelevant detail and misrepresent it as implying those things are true--your position seems to rely extensively on misrepresentation. For example, misrepresenting the behavior of some fundamentalist whack jobs as implying that the Israeli state itself does not respect freedom.

Let's see, will you misrepresent crackdowns of violence on Nakba day as a ban? Will you misrepresent immigration policy or policy in the West Bank or Gaza as if it impinged Israeli Arab citizen's rights? I bet you will. You love those sorts of misrepresentations.

As for Israeli WMD's my concern is with countries that might turn their WMD's over to terrorists, such as Iran or Pakistan. I have no concern whatsoever that Israeli WMD's would wind up in the wrong hands. I'm generally against proliferation of nuclear weapons, but I don't really see a big problem here. Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism. Israel is not.

You've made the false assertion that Israel is somehow equivalent to those countries, when in reality Israeli is a strong democracy that provides firm guarantees of freedom to all of its citizens. None of the other countries in that region come even close. Not only do they persecute non-Muslim citizens routinely, but they don't even provide their Muslim citizens with guaranteed rights as firmly as Israel does.

In comparing Israel to those countries you insult democracy.
I've not made any false assertions. I've backed whatever I've said with links that you should've read but obviously you haven't done that because you'd rather stick to your convenient and false statements. I haven't even remotely brought up immigration policies of Israel in relation to Arab citizens. That is an entire different issue. What I was talking about was Israel banning Arab Israeli political parties. Infringing on their rights as Israeli citizens. And ofcourse all this is not me making shit up, go read for yourself.

Mordechai Vanunu, a Christian converted from Judaism, was kidnapped in Rome after he was lured by Mossad. He was taken to Israel and tortured, convicted and jailed for revealing Israeli WMD program to a British newspaper. That's kidnapping. If he was actually accused of a crime, Israel could ask for his extradition. Vanunu also stated in an interview that had he been Jewish, he would have been treated very differently. More recently, Dirar Abu Seesi was kidnapped from Ukraine by Mossad. Such abductions are in violation of the domestic law of the country in which they occur, as infringements of laws forbidding kidnapping. This abduction is violation of international law — in particular of a prohibition on arbitrary detention.

The ease with which you deny real world facts assures me that you aren't a person worth discussing anything with. You find it incredibly easy to label people 'whackjobs' or 'terrorists' without actually knowing anything about them other than what you see on the idiot box. You have probably never been to the Middle East, or Israel/Palestine and yet you claim with great conviction that Israel is a strong democracy. You don't speak their language (Arabic or Hebrew) and yet you agree with contorted translations without any knowledge. I feel sorry for you sir, but wake up and smell the coffee.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,011
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
The video shows a country where you need police protection if you go in orthodox areas
Correction. The video shows a country where you need police protection if you go into an orthodox area with the intention of disturbing shit. Plainly the camera man was toting along something highly offensive to people in that area. There was clearly something accompanying him that offended everyone there--he never did show us what it was.

In any case despite his shit disturbing antics he got the support and protection of the state because Israel guarantees such freedoms.

Try organizing a "slut walk" in ANY arab country and see what happens. You'll be killed, in many of those countries by the police!

But keep it up--misrepresent, twist, and distort. Pretend that the Israeli police did not come out and protect the shit disturber. Pretend that you could get away with shit like that in any of Israel's neighbours without being killed.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,011
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
I've not made any false assertions.
Yes you did. Your references fail to back up your statements, which are distortions and misrepresentations. For example you said that Nakba day was "banned" when in reality all that was banned were certain violent protests. You wrote that Arabs in Israel are second class citizens when in fact they have the same fundamental rights as anyone else--in fact, Israel even goes so far as to support their Sharia law, something even Canada does not do.

You write things like "state sponsored kidnapping" to describe the arrest of someone who breached Israeli national security. Was his arrest problematic? Sure. Is it fair to say that it means there is some blanket state sponsorship of kidnapping in Israel? No. You are trying to pass the event off as something larger than it was. That's typical.

Meanwhile you wholesale deny or ignore that extreme atrocities committed in Muslim nations. You can't even name ONE Muslim nation that comes anywhere close to offering the level of rights to ANY of its citizens that Israel extends to ALL of its citizens. Yet despite that you lie and misrepresent and pretend there is some sort of equality between Israel and its neighbours.

There is no equality: Israel is the superior nation. It is a democracy. It respects the fundamental human rights of its citizens. No other nation in the Middle East does that. That makes Israel superior to all of them.

Now there's some movement in Egypt--maybe Egypt will emerge as a regime which, like Israel, respects fundamental human rights but so far it has not got there. There is still no other nation in the Middle East which offers its citizens the guaranteed freedoms that Israel does. None.
 

groggy

Banned
Mar 21, 2011
15,262
0
0
Correction. The video shows a country where you need police protection if you go into an orthodox area with the intention of disturbing shit. Plainly the camera man was toting along something highly offensive to people in that area. There was clearly something accompanying him that offended everyone there--he never did show us what it was.
Ah, the old 'invisible offensive item' defense.
Excellent use of contradictory terms as well. As in, 'there was clearly something' offensive, but 'he never did show us'. How would you reach that argument? The only way I can assume is that 'clearly' you refuse to accept results different from your preconceived perceptions.

This all just backs up that study that shows that Israel has the same amount of freedom as Somalia and Afghanistan.
You're free to worship whatever you want, as long as you have a gun or security forces to back yourself up.
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,107
113
And you try to insult our intelligence.

The video shows a country where you need police protection if you go in orthodox areas, a country where synagogues and mosques are torched. A country where the laws may say they support freedom of religion, but police action says otherwise, as shown in the video.

LOL. You really are desperate. The video show that in religious site orthodox Jews require that women dress modestly. i guess you find that objectionable because woman are allowed to wear bikinis in mosques or in the Vatican. In a Muslim country a women would be stoned for dressing immodestly. What the video shows is the police intervening to protect the peace. In most countries that is a good thing.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,011
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Ah, the old 'invisible offensive item' defense.
Excellent use of contradictory terms as well. As in, 'there was clearly something' offensive, but 'he never did show us'. How would you reach that argument? The only way I can assume is that 'clearly' you refuse to accept results different from your preconceived perceptions.

This all just backs up that study that shows that Israel has the same amount of freedom as Somalia and Afghanistan.
You're free to worship whatever you want, as long as you have a gun or security forces to back yourself up.
He plainly was doing something those people found highly offensive but we never are shown what. He was obviously there to disturb people, and you should be fair and acknowledge that the israeli police defended his right to do that.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,358
6,671
113
...
I would like you to quote where have I said that other middle eastern countries are 'better'? I have accepted that oppression and corruption exists in every country in the Middle East, but you cannot just assume that Israel is the supreme example of religious freedom and a just state. That is plain wrong! Sorry to see that just like MEMRI, basketcase seems to contort words and meanings to suit his statements.
Yet you only have seen fit to comment against Israel. Your silence on Syria is deafening.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,358
6,671
113
The funny thing is, that I've studied and learnt Arabic. So I can tell you, that the translation does not match what the person is speaking. I've probably gone through atleast half of MEMRI's website during my masters level research for my paper on Crisis in the Middle East and I could not use the website to cite or source anything because it was plain garbage. ...
So maybe you want to actually translate the clips I posted for us and explain why the MEMRI translation is so false.

I am at a disadvantage not speaking or reading Arabic, Hebrew, or anything else besides English (and maybe pretend in French) but I posted those clips specifically because the Arabic is clearly audible for anyone who disputes it. If the translations are wrong, please step up and prove it.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,358
6,671
113
Why do you keep going off on a tangent? You haven't responded about "Israel ban on Nakba day? ...
I can simply answer that. Israel has absolutely not banned Nakba day (and you either knowingly are lying or your claim to expertise in the Middle East is inflated).

What they did was chosen not to give state funds to any agency's promotion of Nakba day.
http://www.jta.org/news/article/2011/03/23/3086536/knesset-passes-nakba-law

I think it's is a understandable decision because unfortunately, Nakba Day has been so politicized that it is not a commemoration of the Arabs who fled Israel and have been essentially kept in captivity by their Arab neighbours but instead has simply become an attack against Israel's existence. I wouldn't sponsor this law but I can see why the government of Israel doesn't want its own tax dollars spent in attempts to delegitimize it.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,358
6,671
113
And you try to insult our intelligence.

The video shows a country where you need police protection if you go in orthodox areas, a ...
It is actually just as easy to walk into any neighborhood in Toronto with a camera crew and get the same reaction when you intentionally ask questions seeking to get that reaction (slightly different but have you ever seen Rick Mercer and Talking to Americans?). The police did what they should have done. The guy on film was be legally allowed to ask those questions and the residents were legally allowed to gather and yell at the guy. An undemocratic country would have thrown people in jail for doing so yet all that happened here was the guy was escorted away from the confrontation he was seeking.
 

ali90

New member
Apr 19, 2011
2,688
0
0
I can simply answer that. Israel has absolutely not banned Nakba day (and you either knowingly are lying or your claim to expertise in the Middle East is inflated).

What they did was chosen not to give state funds to any agency's promotion of Nakba day.
http://www.jta.org/news/article/2011/03/23/3086536/knesset-passes-nakba-law

I think it's is a understandable decision because unfortunately, Nakba Day has been so politicized that it is not a commemoration of the Arabs who fled Israel and have been essentially kept in captivity by their Arab neighbours but instead has simply become an attack against Israel's existence. I wouldn't sponsor this law but I can see why the government of Israel doesn't want its own tax dollars spent in attempts to delegitimize it.
From the link you posted...

"It is a softened version of the bill approved in July 2009 by the Ministerial Committee for Legislation, which made participation in Nakba Day events punishable by up to three years in prison". - no mention of whether that July 2009 bill was removed from law. So you could very well be fined and prisoned.

"Israeli rights groups called the laws discriminatory and an attack against Israeli Arabs".

Did you even read it completely and try to make sense of it? And the same link you posted has no mention of Nakba Day being anything close to fuji's 'violent protests'. Thanks, maybe fuji can see how his preconceived notions are false.

By those very laws in 2009 and the current one, the Knesset has enacted to pull the plant from its roots. Without any funding and the threat of being prisoned looming over one's head, who's going to peacefully participate in Nakba day events. Bare in mind, fuji and basketcase, that violence is mentioned nowhere in the link that basket has posted.

Israel seems to be very insecure about its democratic nature. If you don't consider Israel a democratic or a Jewish state, you shall be jailed and fined!?

Yet you only have seen fit to comment against Israel. Your silence on Syria is deafening.
Why don't you start a thread on Syria and I'll open up about that issue? We are talking about Israel and Palestine here. What have you been smoking?

Anyways, just so you can satisfy your insatiable thirst to hear something out of me against Syria then IMHO, Syria is a corrupt, tyrannical regime that should be brought down. What's happening there has NO EXCUSE and Bashar should be brought to face an International Court of Justice. Well, so should Ariel Sharon.

Meanwhile you wholesale deny or ignore that extreme atrocities committed in Muslim nations. You can't even name ONE Muslim nation that comes anywhere close to offering the level of rights to ANY of its citizens that Israel extends to ALL of its citizens.
Why don't you open a new thread to vent your anger about that? Lets talk about that over there. This thread isn't talking about Muslim nations. In any case, my comment above about Syria should at least make you smile. C'mon?

So maybe you want to actually translate the clips I posted for us and explain why the MEMRI translation is so false.

I am at a disadvantage not speaking or reading Arabic, Hebrew, or anything else besides English (and maybe pretend in French) but I posted those clips specifically because the Arabic is clearly audible for anyone who disputes it. If the translations are wrong, please step up and prove it.
Even if I were to translate those videos for you, I don't think you are going to believe me because you seem hell-bent on proving MEMRI as an authentic institute. The criticism of MEMRI is widespread. I'll post the criticism here and if you are in tune with well-known media research institutes then you'll recognize popular and well-educated people criticizing MEMRI for bias, selectivity and translation inaccuracies. I'll give you an example here:

Following the 7 July 2005 London bombings, Al Jazeera invited Hani al-Sebai, an Islamist living in Britain, to take part in a discussion on the event. At one point al-Sebai stated in regard to the victims:
there is no term in Islamic jurisprudence called civilians. Dr Karmi is here sitting with us, and he's very familiar with the jurisprudence. There are fighters and non-fighters. Islam is against the killing of innocents. The innocent man cannot be killed according to Islam.
Memri was critisized for translating this sentence as:
the term civilians does not exist in Islamic religious law. Dr Karmi is sitting here, and I am sitting here, and I’m familiar with religious law. There is no such term as civilians in the modern western sense. People are either of dar al-harb [at war] or not.
By leaving out the condemnation of the "killing of innocents" entirely, this translation left the implication that civilians (the innocent) are considered a legitimate target.

In a Muslim country a women would be stoned for dressing immodestly.
That's a fallacy.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts