It's a stupid decision only because Americans are hypocritical. And so are many TERBies, it seems.
University student loses scholarship over porn film
- Thread starter swiss69
- Start date
Pretty much everything you say about Canada, except perhaps the weather and the ease of immigration, is flat out wrong, especially regarding women. Even in the case of the weather, there are plenty of places in the US with horrible weather (e.g. winters in Minnesota is as cold as many parts of Canada, if not colder, and don't forget the large parts of the Midwest subject to frequent tornadoes).
Granted, there are many places in the US that are quite pleasant to live, with great job opportunities, so for career advancement it's sensible to move to the US. But Canada is still a wonderful place to live, and most people are quite friendly.
Now back to the OP, it appears that the young woman was being awfully naive to think that if she's agreed to appear in online porn that it would somehow be restricted only to paying members. At the same time, appearing in pornography is perfectly legal, and being a consenting adult, what she does in her private, off-campus time is her business, not the business of the university. And as far as I can see, there is no justification for the university to revoke her scholarship.
Female students from Arizona State and other American universities have posed nude in Playboy.
You realize that had we lived in a place where civilian women are good looking and available, we would not be on this board?
I think to be admitted to the Law Society one has to be of high moral character. I think any woman who poses nude is of the highest moral character and worthy of being legal counsel.
Nothing. Where did it say that she can't attend the university? It says that a scholarship would be revoked. That means she can attend but without some extra free funds.
She may have been confused, since she's studying for a geography degree, that what goes on the internet can be seen anywhere in the world that has internet access and it may have future repercussions.
The upside to this is that I would certainly consider hiring her. She seems attractive and we ALL know how open she is.
I might pay her $2k to polish my cock and allow me to film it every day for a week. For private use only.
Perhaps that's the reason why you may be on this board, but that doesn't necessarily apply to everyone! People are on this board to share their experiences with SPs, MPs and the like, as well as to share their opinions on a wide range of topics (hence the Lounge, Politics, Sports, etc.). Many of the men here are married or already in a relationship with civilian women, but just want to try something different.
As for me, I've had no problems meeting good looking, available civilian women here in Toronto (in fact, I'm in a relationship with one). And that's just in Toronto -- I am positive that there are plenty of available women to date elsewhere in the country as well.
So do law school applicants start off with high moral character and by the end of it, they have to prove they are completely amoral assholes to pass the bar?
Always in the Groove...
All I got from the article is that somebody wrote a letter requesting that this student have her scholarship revoked because she appeared in a porn film. Nothing more, nothing less. No mention of the university's position on the issue.
The reality is that it's not a good idea to suck and fuck on film for the world to see in the US if you 1) want to be taken seriously 2) do not want to catch any flack of any kind. I thought everybody knew this but I'm probably just old fashioned.
we need a poll on whether this film is going to increase her chances in life
I would reluctantly say yes
I would reluctantly say yes
Actually Gameboy, that's how you can tell this shit is a complete setup from the get go. North American porn doesn't use condoms, European porn does. Porn stars are tested and the industry is generally clean excluding the odd scare. And if this was "real" the guy himself would be nothing short of an idiot having BBFS with a line of women looking to get into the trade. If she's willing to do it for you, she's did it for every other unsavoury character out there.
As for the chicks poor judgement, personally I don't buy into that bullshit at all. Making porn is entirely legal. The industry generates more wealth than the movie and music industry. The issue isn't with her, it's with society.
BUT the big question is.................who ratted her out. I mean, you would have had to WATCH the film to know she was a student at ASU and likely be affliated with that college. So what's happened here is some backwater redneck asshole saw this, thought "that'll fuck up the college" and then squealed FORGETTING he was watching the porn.
In the end it'll help her. She was a faceless woman prior to this. Now she'll end up on Howard Stern, on the Simpsons, etc, etc. Good for her.
This has been said and repeated often but never substantiated. The $8 billion porn industry revenue often bandied about is a fictitious figure.
I disagree. There is a place for conservatism and modesty. The reality is that once a guy knows a girl has sucked cock and is ok with the world seeing it, he is less likely to respect her the same way. Maybe because he gets a boner every time he speaks to her. It is what it is.
My guess is that it was a jealous female who ratted her out or a ex boyfriend, or somebody with some personal ties to her.
I don't know about all that.
I cannot imagine how something that is accessible for free from anywhere in the world can generate anything close to that number
Do "webcam girls" still exist? Do they still charge a fee like that university student did?
http://www.moneytalks.com/view_flash.htm?id=nd5000&trailer=sunset.mp4
Same girl? (go to about 1:30 into the preview.)
