It has? I haven't seen any figures to prove it.
Long guns are the weapon of choice in domestic disputes. Women are overwhelmingly the victims in domestic disputes. You've seen those figures already.
Further, where are these crimes being committed in places were long guns are an esential part of life or off of University Avenue?
Domestic disputes happen all over Canada. I understand that the Prairie provinces have the highest rate of long gun crime, primarily relating to domestic disputes there. Presumably that's a direct consequence of there being a higher rate of long gun ownership in those places.
Are you SERIOUSLY going to assert that homicides are the majority of long gun crimes? That there are not dozens of people threatened with a gun for every case where the trigger was pulled? Seriously? If you keep pressing that point I think you are debating for the point of debating, and not really interested in reasoned discussion.
It is reasonable to believe that for every long gun homicide there are dozens if not hundreds of additional cases that did not lead to homicide, may not even have led to injury. It is unreasonable to dispute that.