A few things: Just because a woman considers herself upscale and worth $1000/2 hours at a minimum, does not actually mean she's worth that much. Another point, and this is just my opinion, from a rough estimate, about 90-95% of SP's are unattractive, and 5-10% are very attractive. I believe no man should pay to be with a woman that is less attractive than he is, yet surprisingly many men do. A lot of women believe that just because she's a woman, a man should have to pay to be with her even if the guy is attractive and the girl is unattractive, it makes little sense. Finally, you hear about some SP's requesting a picture from their clients, and who will only let a man pay to be with her if she's attracted to them and if there's chemistry. I'm stating the obvious here, but if she's attracted to the guy and there's chemistry the guy shouldn't have to pay to be with her, the only guys that should pay are ones that are less attractive than she is, and guys that she's not attracted to. Think about it, does it make sense when an SP says "I'll only let you pay me $500/hr if I think you're hot, if I don't think you're hot, you can't pay me $500/hr." I think some women are unfortunately living in a fantasy world, that's not how the real world works.
That's just my opinion though.