NOW THAT IS FUNNY!!!!!!!I dont know what you mean. Please direct me to a post of mine to which you are referring.
Nice dancing!....
NOW THAT IS FUNNY!!!!!!!I dont know what you mean. Please direct me to a post of mine to which you are referring.
That's the point, half-wit, there are none.I dont know what you mean. Please direct me to a post of mine to which you are referring.
Looks like he made out like a bandit here, since prosecutors had recommended a reduced prison sentence of 20 months. Perhaps they bought into some of his bunko argument...The Miami court sentenced Barouh to 10 months in jail...
In fact he got the longest sentence of any of the 11 defendents in the UBS case.Looks like he made out like a bandit here, since prosecutors had recommended a reduced prison sentence of 20 months. Perhaps they bought into some of his bunko argument...
Not surprised here.In fact he got the longest sentence of any of the 11 defendents in the UBS case.
LOL. i obviously misunderstood your post as have been pointed out by the guy who raises the level of debate here with his eloquence and his willingness to respond to the many questions that have been put to him.I must have missed your posts where you are calling out anti-muslim posts.
I guess you forgot this little nugget from a few days ago...you started this thread:In any event if you care to review my posts i have never made ant-Muslim posts or ant-any group for that matter
I think your criticism of Israel has been less than genuine,"they did bad things, but they had to", but let us not dwell on that.I have you will see criticized all groups including, Jews, Israelis and Zionists from time to time. i have left the defense of Muslims to others.
You have obviously not been reading my posts.I think your criticism of Israel has been less than genuine,"they did bad things, but they had to", but let us not dwell on that.
That is not anti-Muslim. It is anti-threatening violence in the name of religion. If you have been reading my posts I condemned the threat of violence by orthodox Jews. Do you support the threat of violence made against the South Park creators or the Danish cartoonist?I guess you forgot this little nugget from a few days ago...you started this thread:
"Once Again Violence or the Threat of Violence Prevails.
Comedy Central censors 'South Park' episode after Muslim threats
http://www.nypost.com/p/entertainmen...#ixzz0lrQ3uMQs
Danish cartoonist at centre of Muhammad controversy on leave 'for security reasons'
http://www.nationalpost.com/news/wor...#ixzz0lrYHWyYK "
like this one:You have obviously not been reading my posts.
it has many flaws, shortcomings and warts, many of which are created from the necessity to survive but notwithstanding all of its flaws, shortcommings and warts an incredible country nonetheless.
I don't think anyone would disagree that the security check points and the frontier controls primarily at Gaza but also at frontiers with West Bank and the security fence and unfortunate but necessary evils. They hurt the living conditions of the Palestinians in both area but are necessary because their leaders do little to deter rockets, terrorism and attacks within Israel and in the case of Hamas encourage same.
Where are your posts complaining about anti-Jewish posts?That's the point, half-wit, there are none.
No reason to single Gryfin out. There are pro jewish bigots and anti jewish bigots here. To me, no difference.Where are your posts complaining about anti-Jewish posts?
Where are your posts criticizing prejudice against Jews?
And you objection to either of those comments is what exactly? I guess you have forgotten my posts where I have referred to the settlers and other Israeli's as criminals or Kahane as a racist etc. The fact that you choose to select certain posts and ignore others simply means either that you have not read them all or you are choosing the selectively for the purpose of making your point which is simply disingenuous on your part if that is the case.like this one:
or this one:
Can you be a bigot if you are simply pro something?No reason to single Gryfin out. There are pro jewish bigots and anti jewish bigots here. To me, no difference.
There are more pro jewish bigots than anti jewish bigots.
I said: "I think your criticism of Israel has been less than genuine,"they did bad things, but they had to", but let us not dwell on that."And you objection to either of those comments is what exactly?
it has many flaws, shortcomings and warts, many of which are created from the necessity to survive but notwithstanding all of its flaws, shortcommings and warts an incredible country nonetheless.
I don't think anyone would disagree that the security check points and the frontier controls primarily at Gaza but also at frontiers with West Bank and the security fence and unfortunate but necessary evils. They hurt the living conditions of the Palestinians in both area but are necessary because their leaders do little to deter rockets, terrorism and attacks within Israel and in the case of Hamas encourage same.
Well you could always ask a skinhead neo-nazi white supremacist just to see what answer he would give you. Or ask a member of the KKK. They are both pro quite a few somethings...Can you be a bigot if you are simply pro something?
Sure, but the others haven't descended to the depths of hypocrisy that Gryfin has--he singled himself out by accusing someone else of ignoring the rights violations committed by one side, while he is literally infamous for doing that.No reason to single Gryfin out. There are pro jewish bigots and anti jewish bigots here.
So when they advocate killing Jews and blacks they are just be pro-white? Interesting interpretation.Well you could always ask a skinhead neo-nazi white supremacist just to see what answer he would give you. Or ask a member of the KKK. They are both pro quite a few somethings...