Dream Spa

Palestinian Bedouins are protesting against discrimination by the Israeli government

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,483
4,902
113
Israel's Negev 'frontier'

By Ben White


Palestinian Bedouins are protesting against discrimination by the Israeli government [GETTY]

On this year's Land Day, tens of thousands of Palestinian citizens of Israel marched in Sakhnin, an Israeli city in the Lower Galilee, to protest against past and present systematic discrimination. But with the focus on Israel's policies of land confiscation, there was significance in a second protest that day.

In the Negev (referred to as al-Naqab by Palestinian Bedouins), over 3,000 attended a rally at al-Araqib, an 'unrecognised' Palestinian Bedouin village whose lands are being targeted by the familiar partnership of the Israeli state and the Jewish National Fund.

The historical context for the crisis facing Palestinian Bedouins today is important, as the Israeli government and Zionist groups try to propagate the idea that the problems, so far as they exist, are 'humanitarian' or 'cultural'.

Even the category of 'Bedouin' is historically and politically loaded, with many disputing what they see as an Israeli 'divide and rule' strategy towards the Palestinians.

Alienated and 'unrecognised'

During the Nakba, the vast majority of the Palestinian Bedouins in the Negev - from a pre-1948 population of 65,000 to 100,000 - were expelled. Those who remained were forcibly concentrated by the Israeli military in an area known as the 'siyag' (closure).

The military regime experienced by Palestinian citizens until 1966 meant further piecemeal expulsions, expropriation of land, and restrictions on movement. Ultimately, only 19 out of 95 tribes remained.

The defining dynamic between the Israeli state and its Palestinian minority has been the expropriation of Arab land and its transfer to state or Jewish ownership.

Israel refused to recognise the land rights of the Palestinian Bedouins, who today are alienated from almost all of their land through a complex combination of land law and planning boundaries.

An estimated 70,000 to 80,000 Palestinian citizens in the Negev live in dozens of 'unrecognised villages' - communities that the state refuse to acknowledge exist despite the fact that some pre-date the establishment of Israel and others are the result of the Israeli military's forced relocation drives.

These shanty towns are refused access to basic infrastructure.

One approach the Israeli state has taken is to create, or 'legalise', a small number of towns and villages in the hope that more Palestinians will move into these areas.

Yet even this policy, often presented as a 'humane' response to 'Bedouin' needs, highlights a disparity: Jewish regional authorities and individual farms enjoy a massively lower population density compared to the space allotted by the state to Palestinian townships, which are ranked among the most deprived communities in the country.

'Developing the Negev'


As many as 80,000 people live in 'unrecognised' villages in the Negev [GETTY]

The Israeli government, meanwhile, along with agencies like the Jewish National Fund and Jewish Agency, are preoccupied with the idea of 'developing the Negev', and boosting its population.

In March, the 'Negev 2010' conference was held in Beir al-Saba' (Beersheva), drawing hundreds of politicians and business people, with the focus being attracting 300,000 new residents to the area.

Speakers included Shimon Peres, the Israeli president, Silvan Shalom, the Negev and Galilee development minister, and Ariel Atias, the housing minister.

Last year, Shalom held a joint press conference with religious Zionist rabbis to outline plans for increasing the south's population, with one of the rabbis stressing the need for a "Jewish majority" in the region.

Atias, for his part, has previously expressed his belief that it is "a national duty to prevent the spread" of Palestinian citizens.

It is not, therefore, hard to read between the lines when Israeli policy makers and Zionist officials from organisations like the Jewish National Fund talk about 'developing the Negev'.

Zionist frontier

The Negev is the location for classic, unfiltered Zionist frontier discourse.

The Jewish National Fund in the UK talks about supporting "the pioneers who are bringing the desert to life", while an article in the Zionist magazine B'Nai B'Rith called the Negev "the closest thing to the tabula rasa many of Israel's pre-state pioneers found when they first came to the Holy Land".

The idea of the 'empty' land sits uncomfortably alongside another important emphasis - 'protection' or 'redemption'.

As the Jewish National Fund's US chief executive put it in January 2009, "if we don't get 500,000 people to move to the Negev in the next five years, we're going to lose it". To who, he did not need to say.

There were no illusions about the meaning of this discourse, and its consequences, at a February conference which brought together academics and experts specialising in issues facing the Bedouins of the Negev.

Through the seminars and discussions, one theme clearly came through: The relationship between the Palestinian Bedouins and the Israeli state was rapidly deteriorating.

A number of the organisers of, and speakers at, 'Rethinking the Paradigms: Negev Bedouin Research 2000+' were themselves from the Negev, where overcrowding, home demolitions, and dispossession are features of everyday life for Palestinians.

The conference was one of the first of its kind in the UK, sponsored by the British Academy and Exeter University's Institute of Arab and Islamic Studies and Politics Department.

Excluded from discourse

Western media coverage of the structural discrimination and discriminatory land and housing policies experienced by Palestinian Bedouins has generally been poor.

In a discourse shaped by Zionist and Orientalist tropes, the Negev is a vast, wild, desert; a frontier to be civilised. The 'Bedouin', meanwhile, are either invisible or exotic savages, objects of benevolent philanthropy.

Furthermore, the international 'peace process' has meant that the question of Palestine has become the story of negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian Authority. Palestinian citizens of Israel have been left out, a situation exacerbated by the media mentality of 'if it bleeds it leads'. Core issues facing Palestinian Bedouins - land control, zoning, bureaucratic and physical boundaries of exclusion - are not considered suitable fare.

This nonexistent or weak coverage is regrettable, particularly as Israel's policies in the Negev towards the Palestinian Bedouin minority are highly illuminating for understanding the state's position vis-à-vis the Palestinians in a more general sense.

Moreover, tension is building in the Negev over Israel's continued apartheid-like policies. Palestinian Bedouins continue to resist the strategies of the Israeli state and Zionist agencies, through legal battles, and grassroots organisation, like the Regional Council for the Unrecognised Villages.

Perhaps one of the main kinds of resistance being offered by the Palestinians in the Negev is their determination to stay. This steadfastness is a direct refusal of a strategy of home demolitions, dispossession and Judaisation.

The recent protest in al-Araqib could only be a foretaste of things to come, as Palestinian Bedouins demand equality from a state seemingly unwilling to change.

Ben White is a freelance journalist and writer specialising in Palestine/Israel. His articles have appeared in publications like the Guardian's 'Comment is free', New Statesman, Electronic Intifada, Middle East International, Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, and others. His first book, Israeli Apartheid: A Beginner's Guide, was published in 2009 by Pluto Press.

The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial policy.
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,108
113
I am shocked. An arctilce which is crtical of isreal in Al Jazeera written by someone from the Guardian which has become the hoem of ant-Zionaism and anti-Semistism in the UK.

I do not know much about the content of the artcle and I do not condone actions such as deceibed, if in fact they are true.

I find it somewhat pathetic that there are members of this board whose full time job seems to be scouring the internet and other souces looking for artcles with which to condem Isreal. While Israel is certainly not above reproach it is also not alone in that respect and the members might have some greater credibility if on occasion they were to concede that the Palestinians are not all without even the tiniest blemish.

If other members were to take the same approach vis a vis the Palestinians and surrounding Arab countries this board would not have enough band width to accommodate all of the horror stories.

To their credit the posters on this board have not taken that approach.
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,483
4,902
113
I am shocked. An arctilce which is crtical of isreal in Al Jazeera written by someone from the Guardian which has become the hoem of ant-Zionaism and anti-Semistism in the UK.

I do not know much about the content of the artcle and I do not condone actions such as deceibed, if in fact they are true.

I find it somewhat pathetic that there are members of this board whose full time job seems to be scouring the internet and other souces looking for artcles with which to condem Isreal. While Israel is certainly not above reproach it is also not alone in that respect and the members might have some greater credibility if on occasion they were to concede that the Palestinians are not all without even the tiniest blemish.

If other members were to take the same approach vis a vis the Palestinians and surrounding Arab countries this board would not have enough band width to accommodate all of the horror stories.

To their credit the posters on this board have not taken that approach.
How is your book coming along?
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,483
4,902
113

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,108
113
We are waiting for your book.
Not really necessary that I write a book. there are already many of them setting out more eloquently than I could the miracle which is Israel. the creation out of the desert of a democratic state with a bustling economy, thriving cultural and business institutions amidst a sea of adversity, surrounded by hostile states intent in its destruction, having fought 2 wars and terrorist attacks too numerous to count. it has many flaws, shortcomings and warts, many of which are created from the necessity to survive but notwithstanding all of its flaws, shortcommings and warts an incredible country nonetheless. Go to Amazon, no shortage of books.
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,483
4,902
113
Not really necessary that I write a book. there are already many of them setting out more eloquently than I could the miracle which is Israel. the creation out of the desert of a democratic state with a bustling economy, thriving cultural and business institutions amidst a sea of adversity, surrounded by hostile states intent in its destruction, having fought 2 wars and terrorist attacks too numerous to count. it has many flaws, shortcomings and warts, many of which are created from the necessity to survive but notwithstanding all of its flaws, shortcommings and warts an incredible country nonetheless. Go to Amazon, no shortage of books.
Would you care to be a little more specific? I remind you of what you expect of other members:

..................... the members might have some greater credibility if on occasion they were to concede that the Palestinians are not all without even the tiniest blemish.
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,108
113
Would you care to elaborate? I remind you of what you expect of other members:
I don't think anyone would disagree that the security check points and the frontier controls primarily at Gaza but also at frontiers with West Bank and the security fence and unfortunate but necessary evils. They hurt the living conditions of the Palestinians in both area but are necessary because their leaders do little to deter rockets, terrorism and attacks within Israel and in the case of Hamas encourage same. Likewise there are many settlements which should be disbanded and I have no doubt will be as part of a comprehensive peace negotiation.

Israel is not without shortcomings. My posts are consistent in this regard. I am still waiting for the usual gang to point out even one flaw of the Palestinians. even jaywalking. But alas, nothing yet.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,477
6,709
113
So dan, was this article about events a week or two ago meant solely to bait toguy or did you have something important to say?

Could it be that you are you complaining that Israel allows people to protest?
 

gryfin

New member
Aug 30, 2001
9,632
0
0
So dan, was this article about events a week or two ago meant solely to bait toguy or did you have something important to say?

Could it be that you are you complaining that Israel allows people to protest?
The continual dumbing-effects of zionism are always a source of amusement. Eventually, they all adopt the dopey Alfred E Neuman "What, me worry?" stance - like this quoted post.
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,108
113
The continual dumbing-effects of zionism are always a source of amusement. Eventually, they all adopt the dopey Alfred E Neuman "What, me worry?" stance - like this quoted post.
LOL. Never fails to provoke a laugh. Thanks.
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,483
4,902
113
So dan, was this article about events a week or two ago meant solely to bait toguy or did you have something important to say?
Truly, I am not really against or for any of the combattans in the middle east.

I just get a laugh every time the toguy and others tell us that white is black and black is white,
and call anybody reporting anything negative about Israel anti-semitic.
 

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
27,326
7,994
113
Room 112
Truly, I am not really against or for any of the combattans in the middle east.

I just get a laugh every time the toguy and others tell us that white is black and black is white,
and call anybody reporting anything negative about Israel anti-semitic.
If the negativity was objective, balanced and constructive I'd have no issue with it. But when it is rooted in hate, delegitimacy, exaggeration and mistruths then guys like myself and toguy have a problem with it.
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,483
4,902
113
If the negativity was objective, balanced and constructive I'd have no issue with it. But when it is rooted in hate, delegitimacy, exaggeration and mistruths then guys like myself and toguy have a problem with it.
Yeah right, clearly this piece is anti-semitic because the author has written earlier articles for publications like the Guardian's 'Comment is free', New Statesman, Electronic Intifada, Middle East International, Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, and others. Therefore it is rooted in hate, delegitimacy, exaggeration and mistruths and is null and void. The events described never happened.

Remember:

1. Israel has created a paradise out of the desert.
2. Israelis deplore the loss of all life.
3. Israel has tried for 60 years to create a homeland for the Palestinians
4. Israel has continuously been trying to improve the financial and economic situation in the west Bank
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,108
113
Remember:

1. Israel has created a paradise out of the desert.
2. Israelis deplore the loss of all life.
3. Israel has tried for 60 years to create a homeland for the Palestinians
4. Israel has continuously been trying to improve the financial and economic situation in the west Bank
Which part is wrong?
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,477
6,709
113
Which part is wrong?
I'd say all four as they are absolute statements.

1. Israel has done a good job creating a sustainable society and economy in a land that contained much wasteland. You're deluded if you think it's a paradise.
2. Many Israelis (though not all) deplore the loss of all life.
3. General Israeli opinion over the last 30 years has favoured a two state solution. Before that they were too busy trying to survive as a country against hostile neighbours (and to some extent their politics are still governed by this).
4. Israel has spent a significant amount of money on the infrastructure in the West Bank. Ok, maybe your #4 is close.
 
Last edited:
Toronto Escorts