Barriers in Subway stations is a joke...they'll just jump somewhere else. Just like the millions they spent on the Bloor Viaduct.
I doubt it is a "joke" since many mega cities outside North America have the will and budgets to erect barriers, aka Platform screen doors or "budget" version Automatic platform gates.Barriers in Subway stations is a joke...they'll just jump somewhere else. Just like the millions they spent on the Bloor Viaduct.
So... they will find some other way, which means they won't be stranding thousands of people on the subway? Good stuff.If someone wants to off themselves badly enough they will find a way if they cannot jump in front of subway train... they will do it some other way.
But think of the cost. Now suppose someone pushes someone(or jumps) in front of a streeetcar. Woops, time to put up barriers on Toronto streets.So... they will find some other way, which means they won't be stranding thousands of people on the subway? Good stuff.
Could not believe how "misguided" the politicians try to solve the problem.$700,000,000 to build barriers.
Right now the train can be off by +/- 5 to 10 feet and it won't matter. Put doors in and it drops to +/- an inch or two. It is not just the station that needs modifying it is the trains as well.RE: Fuji - "...I understand the issue is that the system as it stands today cannot stop the trains accurately enough to ensure they wind up in front of the sliding doors every time..."
Really? They always seem to stop right in front of me whenever I ride the subway. Or even the GO train!
Such a program would last all of one week, before the TTC would have to stop it because of a deluge of bitching and moaning from the media and riders. Plus, an extra 30 seconds per stop would add up if you were riding from Kipling to Bloor-Yonge, for example.Actually, it's not the suicides, it's more the psychos that push people that concern me.
If you want to kill yourself, you'll find another way.
I think slowing the trains is ideal and would cost nothing except an extra 30 seconds per stop.
Logic? You must be kidding!The cost per saved life is way too high. It's that simple. Way out of whack with other ways of saving lives, for instance in the medical field. I figure for 700 million you could provide well over a hundred thousand MRIs to at risk groups. Bet you'd save a lot more lives than a dozen jumpers.