From 30 seconds of searching and not that you'd bother to read it,
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/05/13/1084289823327.html
See Robert Pape for his study of 23 years of suicide bombers
https://outerdnn.outer.jhuapl.edu/VIDEOS/033006/PapeNotes.pdf
It's funny that you brag about finding articles in 30 seconds and what you come up with is not related to what you talking about. It seems if that was your goal it should only have taken you 2-3 seconds.
But interestingly, the references you cite appear to bolster Scouser's arguments rather than yours. Before that though, let's deal with your comments that I questioned. To refresh your memory, it was this:
basketcase said:
Except that it has been shown over and over that the terrorist types are not the poor and starving but rather the well off and educated (in this case often at Israeli universities).
The articles you've relied upon are about suicide bombers and not terrorists as you purport. Given the Israeli propensity to call just about anyone a terrorist, that group is infinitely larger than the number of suicide bombers. So, your first point goes out the window. Secondly, you state that they often go to Israeli universities but the articles don't make a single mention of it. (Maybe you can come up with some names and universities...but I'm not too confident in your abilities to come up with anything given your track record) There goes your second point. So.....you end up with nothing.
As for what supports Scouser, let's take a quick look.
Your first link finishes with the quote:
"A sense of duty to a brotherhood was the most important way rational people could be persuaded to kill themselves, said Scott Atran, an anthropologist at the University of Michigan."
This only serves to underline Scouser's point that abject suffering of a people (in the case of Palestinians more than 60 years) leads to the kinship that comes forth from shared suffering.
More importantly...I'm quite familiar with Pape's work and would like to quote Dying to Win: The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism (2005; ISBN 1-4000-6317-5).
He says there is"little connection between suicide terrorism and Islamic fundamentalism, or any one of the world’s religions... . Rather, what nearly all suicide terrorist attacks have in common is a specific secular and strategic goal: to compel modern democracies to withdraw military forces from territory that the terrorists consider to be their homeland" (p. 4).
On page 79 -80 he goes on to say "The taproot of suicide terrorism is nationalism," and that it is "an extreme strategy for national liberation"