I'll pm you, and you tell me if she was lying. I'll think about that. The thing with you, is that, I don't trust you.
wtf
- Thread starter TESLAMotors
- Start date
I'll pm you, and you tell me if she was lying. I'll think about that. The thing with you, is that, I don't trust you.
This bugged me last night and it still bugs me now.
Who the hell are you to be insisting and telling another member what his ethnicity is? Taunting that you know personal information about him that he's never divulged - just because you gossiped about him with some escort you got "close" to? I can only imagine what she said about YOU to her many other clients she was "close" to.
Whatever this ongoing obsessive "thing" is you have with fugi, you're crossing the line now. The fact that your info is incorrect matters not, you're still trying to "out" personal info. Meanwhile you're like the tiny chihuahua that nips and yaps at the big doggie's hind leg.
You should be temp banned. Check yourself dude.
Latinboy, your post led me to realize this is serous stuff.
If I openly declared I knew the identity of some other terb member
what would the implication be? Seems like it doesn't matter if I meant
to threaten to expose that member's personal info. Nor does it
matter if I actually had the info. The fact that I made it known
that I have the capability to breach some other member's privacy
is very disturbing.
I've never bothered myself to look into the posting
guidelines for this forum. So is it against any rule for
someone to post anything that suggest he/she is privy
to the identity of another poster?
If I openly declared I knew the identity of some other terb member
what would the implication be? Seems like it doesn't matter if I meant
to threaten to expose that member's personal info. Nor does it
matter if I actually had the info. The fact that I made it known
that I have the capability to breach some other member's privacy
is very disturbing.
I've never bothered myself to look into the posting
guidelines for this forum. So is it against any rule for
someone to post anything that suggest he/she is privy
to the identity of another poster?
7. No personal information, or links to personal information, shall be posted, even if it is 'commonly known.' With this in mind, links to Facebook or similar sites will not be permitted. Threatening to divulge personal information and/or personal threats (even veiled threats) will result in posting privileges being revoked WITHOUT WARNING and, in extreme cases, the possibility of contacting the user's ISP or law enforcement.
I went over board, and I publicly apologize to fugi.
But I do appreciate consistency on this board. which is often not the case.
You might be banned now if I were the sort of person who went running to the mods every time somebody attacked me. You will note that I haven't, I don't do that, and if you are lucky no mod will stumble across your posts.
You really should be more careful. Maybe next time you post personal information about somebody that you got from some SP she actually won't be lying, and then you may cause somebody real harm.
G
I am guilty of not reading this thread entirely, so correct me if I'm out of line here, but are you suggesting that SPs can't be close with "clients"? Because my best of friends and the people I hold closest to my heart are clients. They are no longer "just clients", but friends. They will be at my wedding one day. ?
I am guilty of not reading this thread entirely, so correct me if I'm out of line here, but are you suggesting that SPs can't be close with "clients"? Because my best of friends and the people I hold closest to my heart are clients. They are no longer "just clients", but friends. They will be at my wedding one day. ?
I don't pretend I speak for the poster to whom you've directed your
question. For an answer to your question in the context of this thread
just ask yourself if you think your close clients could count on you to
divulge personal information of your other clients.
BTW any chance your close clients will invite you to their
wedding one day?
Oh no I don't meet the Titalian standard of approval? That makes me so sad, whatever will I do now?
It is indeed oil&gas.
However I wasn't even aware of a written policy until fuji posted it. Guess I was going on old-fashioned unwritten Code, and common sense. Given that privacy and discretion is paramount in this entire industry. And more so than ever for many since C-36.
Suffice to say I think fuji showed a lot of restraint (more so than I would, as evidenced lol) but good on Titalian for apologizing and acknowledging he went too far. And hopefully he will be a little more discerning of the ladies he chooses to listen to (& gossip with) in future.
Similar threads
