Would you be okay with Canada acquiring nuclear weapons?

[Phil C. McNasty]

I'm wondering if Trudeau regrets banning assault rifles in Canada.
Cause it's kind of hard to defend yourself against the US army with a bottle of maple syrup

 

[nottyboi]

I'm wondering if Trudeau regrets banning assault rifles in Canada.
Cause it's kind of hard to defend yourself against the US army with a bottle of maple syrup

If the US army attacks we'd best surrender, no assault rifle will help you with that. You WILL die with that gun in your cold dead hands.. ... or maybe you will just be blown to bits.

 

[nottyboi]

How long can trump last?
And will the US be a threat again afterwards?

There could be 8 years of JD Vance after so we'd best contend for that. He is actually much less dumb then Orange man. The best option for Canada, is accept 3 months of pain and do our best to harm the US economy on all fronts. Start within 30 days, unleash all weapons simultaneously. And if they don't fold we back down, get the best deal we can and pivot aggressively to Europe and China and forget about the USA.

 

[Phil C. McNasty]

If the US army attacks we'd best surrender, no assault rifle will help you with that. You WILL die with that gun in your cold dead hands.. ... or maybe you will just be blown to bits

If the US did attack then NATO would have to come to our defense under article 5

https://www.nato.int/cps/bu/natohq/topics_110496.htm

 

[danmand]

If the US did attack then NATO would have to come to our defense under article 5

https://www.nato.int/cps/bu/natohq/topics_110496.htm

LOL, let us see what happens when USA invades Greenland.

 

[nottyboi]

If the US did attack then NATO would have to come to our defense under article 5

https://www.nato.int/cps/bu/natohq/topics_110496.htm

If the US did attack then NATO would have to come to our defense under article 5

https://www.nato.int/cps/bu/natohq/topics_110496.htm

There is no "have to" in article 5. Give it a read.