World Trade Center Proposals

bbradk

New member
Oct 10, 2001
84
0
0
Scarborough
???

Why not jusy put up a big plaque, naming all the victims, and leave that space empty.
Rebuilding will only create another target, also, who the hell would want to work in a structure that was rebuilt on the same spot, sure as hell not me!!
Have some respect for the dead, and damn the real estate costs in manhattan, just properly honour the dead, fill in the hole, and never build there again.
 

Cool Dude

Fighting Irishman
Feb 25, 2002
634
0
0
Not preaching, just asking.

Cave Carson said:
Jackson!
Nonetheless, you're still leaving me with the problem of what to call the political philosophy behind the terrorist acts of September 11th!
Islamic extremists?
Islamic terrorists?
 

james t kirk

Well-known member
Aug 17, 2001
24,039
3,893
113
I agree with bbradk....

Don't build anything there. Make it a true memorial site. Trees, fountains, statues, parklike. Fitting in my eyes.

I also agree with Veni vidi vici. From an architectural point of view the towers were rather uninspiring. Just a box.

BUT from an engineering point of view, they were incredible. To build a structure, nay, to build two structures so incredibly tall that stood proud against everything nature could hurl at them.

There was a documentary on TLC recently, something like, "anatomy of collapse". They interviewed the structural engineer who designed the towers.

He is a very unassuming guy. They interviewed him in his office, he answered questions put to him as opposed to taking the fifth. Quiet intelligence, you can just sense it. You can also sense how he is in agony over what happened. The poor guy, without saying it, is blaming himself. I wish i could tell him that nothing could be further from the truth.

It pained me to listen to these idiots rip apart his design when they wouldn't have a clue how to build a log cabin even. There is no way in hell that he could have forseen what happened. I am not so sure that a building of that height could be designed to withstand a similar situation.

The one thing i never ever understood though is why they don't have boxes of parachutes on the roofes of such high buildings. IN the case of the WTC, hundreds of people ran UP because they couldn't run down. If there were parachutes on the roof, I would sure as hell take a shot at it. I have rolled this one around in my head, and i can't see why it wouldn't work.

Stunt men jump off tall buildings with parachutes, if my back was to the wall, i would too.

Just a thought.
 

luckyjackson

Active member
Aug 19, 2001
1,505
2
38
"you're still leaving me with the problem of what to call the political philosophy behind the terrorist acts of September 11th!"

How about, 9-11 terrorists? As soon as you add any word that's already used to represent another group of people, such as Muslim or Islamic (ist), then you devalue that word or change its meaning.

As for the design, I think it has to be some kind of mixed use. Though it would be nice to make it completely commemorative, such as a park or monument, that realestate is just too valuable. They'll have to use part for residence and business as well.
 

Cave Carson

Spelunker Supreme!
Nov 10, 2001
229
0
0
71
Down there....
James Kirk!

"From an architectural point of view the towers were rather uninspiring. Just a box."

Philistine! I just looked at a book on the WTC towers at the World's Biggest Bookstore! They were elegance incarnate in their stark simplicity!
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts