Seems you are not alone in that opinion. The Waukesha County Clerk apparently had a few up her sleeve.Clearly voter fraud....
LOL
OTB
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-wisconsin-election-20110408,0,5633870.story
Seems you are not alone in that opinion. The Waukesha County Clerk apparently had a few up her sleeve.Clearly voter fraud....
LOL
OTB
Interesting that you would think that since the votes from that town were obviously not previously tallied.Seems you are not alone in that opinion. The Waukesha County Clerk apparently had a few up her sleeve.
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-wisconsin-election-20110408,0,5633870.story
That just proves YOU are smarter than the average GOPer....I think they'll realize that this was not a very good operation.I've only been investigating the circumstances a few hours and I can see some things don't add up from a technical and coincidental level.
The clerk's history of electoral fraud doesn't diminish your confidence in her in any way?We win it's a mandate, we lose it's a conspiracy... typical.
OTB
Hell NO!The clerk's history of electoral fraud doesn't diminish your confidence in her in any way?
Where is the evidence of this purported prior incident of electoral fraud?The clerk's history of electoral fraud doesn't diminish your confidence in her in any way?
You're not aware that she was given immunity from prosecution in 2002 in exchange for appearing as a witness for the prosecution in the trial and conviction for electoral fraud of several members of the assembly Republican Caucus?Where is the evidence of this purported prior incident of electoral fraud?
WTF!!!Where is the evidence of this purported prior incident of electoral fraud?
One would have to be mind bogglingly stupid to think that they would be able to get away with it, if it actually is electoral fraud.
Is there a link to a newspaper or news magazine article about it that provides more information than the AP article? Merely because someone is given immunity in exchange for testimony does not necessarily mean that they had their hand in the cookie jar.You're not aware that she was given immunity from prosecution in 2002 in exchange for appearing as a witness for the prosecution in the trial and conviction for electoral fraud of several members of the assembly Republican Caucus?
That trial ended with felony convictions for the speaker of the Wisconsin assembly and the Wisconsin senate majority leader. It's a matter of public record.