Why Korea's, Iran's nuclear weapons don't matter.
- Thread starter WoodPeckr
- Start date
Pecker is a stickler for good grammer, however it's his chronic inability to seperate reality from fiction(ie Pecker's obsessive/compulsive insanity) that is objectionable.red said:while his post lacked panache, style, wit charm, and combined with a reckless inattention to good grammar - it was hardly the basis for such a characterization.
Thanks for the diagnosis, Doc. Clearly you're above all this, though I'd say anyone posting on this forum has their rationality in question, yours truly included.rogerstaubach said:No, no, no ...... I'm objecting to Pecker's incapability of being a sane, rational, intelligent human being.
Please help me follow where he did not separate reality from fiction?:rogerstaubach said:Pecker is a stickler for good grammer, however it's his chronic inability to separte to reality from fiction(ie Pecker's obsessive/compulsive insanity) that is objectionable.
1. Osama is not a terrorist as woodpecker posted?
2. Osama was not created by reagan,cheney et al as woodpecker posted?
Et tu Ampersand?Asterix said:Thanks for the diagnosis, Doc. Clearly you're above all this, though I'd say anyone posting on this forum has their rationality in question, yours truly included.
1. Osama is a terrorist.red said:Please help me follow where he did not separate reality from fiction?:
1. Osama is not a terrorist as woodpecker posted?
2. Osama was not created by reagan,cheney et al as woodpecker posted?
2. Osama is a creation of his own making.
progress. fantastic. you object to the idea that osama was created by the US policies in afganistan in the war against the USSR. While I agree with the fact that the US helping the mujadin (Sp?) in afganistan did not make osama a terrorist - I do think there is some vailidity to the idea that the financial support, weapons and training of osama and other fighters in the region did result in a highly trained group of fighters, who, as has happened many time the world over, went looking for a cause after the fight was over. so nurtured may be an appropriate word.rogerstaubach said:1. Osama is a terrorist.
2. Osama is a creation of his own making.
Actually, asterisk is an ampersand. Asterix is a short, cartoon character. I picked it intentionally to remind myself not to take the "discussion" on the board too seriously.rogerstaubach said:Et tu Ampersand?
thats where you made your first mistake. your seconds mistake was to underestimate the power of surprise.Asterix said:Actually, asterisk is an ampersand. Asterix is a short, cartoon character. I picked it intentionally to remind myself not to take the "discussion" on the board too seriously.
I've been around this board long enough to rarely be surprised anymore.red said:thats where you made your first mistake. your seconds mistake was to underestimate the power of surprise.
NOBODY expects the Spanish Inquisition! Our chief weapon is surprise...surprise and fear...fear and surprise.... Our two weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency.... Our *three* weapons are fear, surprise, and ruthless efficiency...and an almost fanatical devotion to the Pope.... Our *four*...no... *Amongst* our weapons.... Amongst our weaponry...are such elements as fear, surprise....Asterix said:I've been around this board long enough to rarely be surprised anymore.
You know rogiebutt you are coming across as one really simple-mindnumbed Limbaugh lemming high on OxyContin. Your shrill stupidity sounds much like El Rushblow when he was high on OxyContin. If you are at all capable of any independent critical thought, which BTW is quite rare for a Limbaugh lemming like yourself who is content simply regurgitating what your drug addicted piper Rushblow, on a daily basis, shoves down your throat, go to a library, get a good history book and read what went on back when the Neocons and the Osama`s RIFTs were working together as allies against the USSR during Reagan`s Afghan War in the 80`s. Back then Osama was OUR, THE USA`s trained courageous, fearless, FREEDOM FIGHTER, not a TERRORIST at all back then, taking on the USSR as our proxy ally. It`s all there in the history books so all the misinformation, deception and lies come from your feebleminded little fried, what`s left of it, brain.rogerstaubach said:Hey Pecker, engaging in the politics of mass deception? Gee, you wail and cry like a little baby about misinformation, deception and lies all the while engaging in the same.
Hypocrite. Why the misinformation, deception and lies Pecker? To give any cause for terrorism is to be an apologist for terrorism and to delve into misinformation, deception and lies as cause for terrorism borders on fanaticism.
Better yet here`s a thread with a short historical background on how Reagan, Cheney, Rummy, along with a few other neocon rummies, all conspired to help create Osama and his `merry band if RIFTs` back then:
https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=98444
http://www.dkosopedia.com/index.php/The_Power_of_Nightmares:_The_Rise_of_the_Politics_of_Fear
Maybe then you will see rogiebutt, that you, the neocons and those RIFTs, YOU all helped create back then have so much in common, that it`s scary! YOU, Neo-cons & RIFTs, are indeed Two Peas in a Pod.
RIFT had it's origin in Egypt in the 50's. Support of the mujahadeen in Afghanistan by the Americans in the 80's bore little if any consequence as to it's status, ideology, strategy or goals.red said:progress. fantastic. you object to the idea that osama was created by the US policies in afganistan in the war against the USSR. While I agree with the fact that the US helping the mujadin (Sp?) in afganistan did not make osama a terrorist - I do think there is some vailidity to the idea that the financial support, weapons and training of osama and other fighters in the region did result in a highly trained group of fighters, who, as has happened many time the world over, went looking for a cause after the fight was over. so nurtured may be an appropriate word.
Killers in the name of Allah in the 50's, 60's,70's,80's,90's,00's.
I have been trying to find a single intelligent post from you, but so far, no luck.Peeping Tom said:That is why we should pancake most of them and boil the rest in oil. Let them stew in their own juices ...
someone said:I have been trying to find a single intelligent post from you, but so far, no luck.
mirror, mirror on the wall will someone post an intelleget post at all?
I can't bet your posts on the world being made in 7 days if that is what you mean.papasmerf said:mirror, mirror on the wall will someone post an intelleget post at all?
