Why is being the client of a SP not allowed, but it's legal to be a sugar daddy.
- Thread starter shane4
- Start date
Because the law is rarely logical and consistent.
Because SDs are giving gifts, “not paying for service” Clients are paying directly for service.
Because the rad fem anti-sex brigade and the Tories cooperated to totally fuck the sex industry with the new laws in 2016.
Being a John is for the poor and middle classes
Being a Sugar Daddy is for the rich......
Being a Sugar Daddy is for the rich......
SPs today have blurred the lines of what a real Sugar Baby is and what it isn't.
It's suppose to be a relationship with an older man based around receiving gifts and financial help.
Nowadays it's just means escort.
It's suppose to be a relationship with an older man based around receiving gifts and financial help.
Nowadays it's just means escort.
Because the majority of politicians react to problems as opposed to being proactive?
Why is it that trading money for sex is illegal and considred prostitution but if you record it and put it on the internet then it is classed as pornography which is legal to produce.
Also anal sex is legal in Canada between two consenting adults over the age of 18 if done in private, if a third person is in the room then it becomes illegal.
Because C36 is a vaporware law. Put in place to please the Karen's that see all escort as underage exploitation (most probably because no one dared to fuck her for the last 15 years). And to please the pro sex crowd as it does not crimilize them anymore.
Let's put it clear. An escort is selling sex. An SB is selling sex. They are both whores and that's beautiful if you ask me
Let's put it clear. An escort is selling sex. An SB is selling sex. They are both whores and that's beautiful if you ask me
Its all just semantics in wording. If all indy sp's and agencies converted their marketing schemes and promoted themselves as sb's instead of "service providers" it would make a world of difference and everything would be in legal territory. I think the other sticking point is that all sp's require $ financial compensation for a specific amount of their time wearas with some of the legitimate sb's out there (not the ones who are sp's disguised as sb's) you can get away with taking them out on an adventure or a shopping "date" or take them out to a nice fancy restaurant for dinner before you head to a hotel so your not technically giving them $ for their time but rather going on a real date with a consenting adult which just so happens to turn into sex by the end of the night. Point being if sp's would change their compensation policy and accept other forms of compensation rather then just $ it would make things less problematic
So, it is basically based on what the Sugar baby does.
But some Sps offer companionship where there is no sex, no service.
So, why is that legal? If they are charging for time, then wouldn't that be a service?
LD
It is not sexual service. That is how it is defined. Buying sexual services is illegal.
You realize she says time to help you right? LOL
They don't allow you to talk about payment for sex on sugar baby sites. You can talk allowances and gifts for hanging out.
In my experience though, it is mostly different. Other than the scammers from other countries/ones using fake pics. Most of the girls aren't interested in a straight up pay per meet like you would a sp. It's intended you get to know them a bit first, hang out.
In my experience though, it is mostly different. Other than the scammers from other countries/ones using fake pics. Most of the girls aren't interested in a straight up pay per meet like you would a sp. It's intended you get to know them a bit first, hang out.
An SP gets into the business for cash lol wtf?? Lol you can’t pay rent with dinner.
