Now something makes sense to me. I remember an x-friend who couldn't stand silence. Somehow there had to be noise around him or he wanted people talking about nothing so he would pose a stupid Question. I mean Really Stupid Q.
What I gather from this experience is somehow these people need to see action happening, they become BORE very easily. These people can't stand movies or TV because are not in CONTROL, I am sure it could be part of depression or part Introvert syndrome.
SO I google some ideas.
Idea 1 quote
So when people are trying to play political games with “bad faith” questions, the fastest and easiest way to end their play is to treat it as a “good faith” engagement.
That leaves us with one other type of relatively common, (now days), “bad faith” situation, though. This happens all the time online and it increasingly happens in person as well. That’s when someone decides to start
sealioning you.
Sealioning is a serious pain in the ass to deal with. It’s a pure “bad faith” action by those who do it, and they are always, ALWAYS, pushing an agenda. The best you can hope for with them is to steal their audience. Online, just don’t deal with them, and in person, try and avoid the whole thing. Navigating dealing with someone like that successfully is extraordinarily difficult. Even professional communicators, (as in, people who’s careers are based on their ability to successfully communicate about given topics), struggle to deal with them effectively. So if you are dealing with a denialist, or some other purveyor of straight up propaganda positions just get away from the conversation and try to avoid giving their nonsense any air.
Idea 2 quote Wiki
Sealioning (also
sea-lioning and
sea lioning) is a type of
trolling or harassment that consists of pursuing people with relentless requests for evidence, often tangential or previously addressed, while maintaining a pretense of civility and sincerity ("I'm just trying to have a debate"), and feigning ignorance of the subject matter.
[1][2][3][4] It may take the form of "incessant,
bad-faith invitations to engage in debate",
[5] and has been likened to a
denial-of-service attack targeted at human beings.
[6] The term originated with a 2014 strip of the
webcomic Wondermark by David Malki,
[7] which
The Independent called, "..the most apt description of Twitter you'll ever see"
Kind of dumb link but it's a different view
Link C
These people never ever get tire of their actions until other people ignore them.