Toronto Girlfriends
Toronto Escorts

Why Desperate Haitians Want to Kick Out UN Troops

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,537
2,723
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Why Desperate Haitians Want to Kick Out UN Troops
The crisis in Haiti follows decades of economic exploitation and gifts with chains attached – no wonder its citizens are angry

by Isabeau Doucet

You may have heard about the civil unrest in Haiti over recent days, on the heels of a hurricane that thwarted efforts to contain a cholera epidemic that is now a national emergency. All this may fit the image often painted of this much-maligned country: crushing poverty, endemic corruption, the threat of violence so constant that international peacekeepers are required to stop Haitians tearing each other apart.

Well, the poverty and the corruption may be true. But on Thursday, demonstrations calling for the departure of the UN troops, known as Minustah, will be held throughout Haiti's capital, Port-au-Prince, by students, grassroots organisations, opposition groups excluded from the elections, and – most importantly – citizens united by a common cause: that Haiti's escalating nightmares must end now.

As deaths from the cholera outbreak soar past 1,000, fear is taking hold in neighbourhoods that have been so deprived of any civic investment that sanitation infrastructure often amounts to little more than open sewers filled with rubbish and human excrement.

Despite the billions of dollars in international aid that flowed into this country before the earthquake, these neighbourhoods can be found in any town or city across Haiti. Ten months and more billions later, things are much worse, and after suffering in relative silence, with elections just a fortnight away, many here, it seems, have now had enough.

Chants such as "We refuse to vote while living under tarps", have been replaced with "UN peacekeepers and cholera are brothers". The difference now is that in some parts of the country the songs are accompanied by burned-out cars, flaming tyres, broken glass and the coffins of cholera victims blocking movement, forcing aid workers to suspend operations and leaving people to die in the street.

Many accuse the Nepalese UN troops of dumping cholera-infected fecal matter into the Artibonite river, and are now demanding the departure of all UN forces. Officials claim the protests are a politically motivated attempt to disrupt an election timetable they continue to cling to in the face of disaster. If the vote is ultimately postponed, as it surely should be, the international media will no doubt dismiss Haitians as unfit for democracy, still in the grips of Duvalierest dictatorship or too deeply entrenched in anarchy to organise and manifest their popular will.

It's a familiar pattern – in the 1980s, when Aids first came to the world's attention, Haitians were stigmatised as one of the four Hs – homosexuals, hemophiliacs, heroin users and Haitian – having brought the disease to the US. But, like cholera, Aids was not indigenous to Haiti and is only now ravaging the country because somebody else brought it in. And, while Haitians face stigmatisation from their neighbours once again, the world must take its share of the blame.

The real question is: why? Why is there crippling poverty? Why no water, sanitation or medical infrastructure?

A decade ago, money was in place to address the country's failing water system. In 2000, a $54m (£34m) loan from the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) should have given the Haitian government means to rehabilitate its urban and rural water systems, but US foreign policy objectives of destabilising the democratically elected Aristide government got in the way. Sources have suggested the US government asked the IDB to block the loan, as well as others totalling $146m for investment in health, education and sanitation infrastructure, while electoral disputes were worked out, yet the aid freeze continued after they were resolved. A UK study from 2002 still rated Haiti's water as the worst in the world.

An independent investigation should be carried out on the Minustah latrines, but ultimately it could have been anyone – conditions were ripe for cholera because international policy towards Haiti hasn't changed in decades. Economic exploitation, political intervention, NGO gifts with chains attached, media misrepresentation, the same mistakes have been made over and over again. Sadly, even an earthquake doesn't seem to have changed that. It's little wonder Haitians are manifesting their anger in increasingly heated protests.
© 2010 Guardian News and Media Limited
Isabeau Doucet is a journalist based in Port-au-Prince, Haiti. She has been writing about the conditions in camps and the reconstruction process for Haiti Liberte, CSMonitor, and producing for Al Jazeera. She is a graduate student in Anthropology at Goldsmiths, University of London


http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/11/18-12
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,773
3
0
Ah, The Guardian. Enough said.

That's why it is all the fault of the U.S., not of the Nepalese or the U.N.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,558
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
10m people and no sewage system, what could go wrong.

OTB
 

lynxguru

cyberwanderer
Aug 16, 2003
199
0
0
cyberspace
They will never get out of poverty. With families having many kids even though some may advance, one aspect is the growing population. Look at China, they understand it and manage population growth effectively. The Catholic Church is also an obstacle more so in Africa where they haave converted some of the people. Haiti, an absolutely hopeless case.
 

slowandeasy

Why am I here?
May 4, 2003
7,232
0
36
GTA
Why Desperate Haitians Want to Kick Out UN Troops
The answer to that question is that they are STUPID.

I agree with those who say that Haiti (and Africa) should be left to solve their problems on their own.
 

themexi

Eat the Weak
Jun 12, 2006
1,270
25
48
The answer to that question is that they are STUPID.

I agree with those who say that Haiti (and Africa) should be left to solve their problems on their own.
WTF do these animals know about health, civilization, or even what's good for them for that matter?

FUCK them. Leave & take every penny, every dose of medicine, every drop of clean water, every drop of fuel, every piece of computer, construction, transport & communication equipment, every bite of food EVERY single fucking thing the evil whites of the western world have brought in to this shithole.

In addition I would suggest wreck every plane & sink every boat they have, then blockade them & sink any boat coming in or leaving....

Let's see how these animals do on their own.
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,773
3
0
The answer to that question is that they are STUPID.

I agree with those who say that Haiti (and Africa) should be left to solve their problems on their own.
In fairness, Haiti has had corrupt governments for generations, combine that with overpopulation. . . . . . . .

That doesn't mean that we have to be their keepers, however, neither does it mean that somehow they "deserve it."
 
Last edited:

slowandeasy

Why am I here?
May 4, 2003
7,232
0
36
GTA
In fairness, Haiti has had corrupt governments for generations, combine that with other population. . . . . . . .

That doesn't mean that we have to be their keepers, however, neither does it mean that somehow they "deserve it."
I was just being inflammatory. I would not say they deserve what is happening to them, but I do think they deserve a good slap in the head.
 

rld

New member
Oct 12, 2010
10,664
2
0
WTF do these animals know about health, civilization, or even what's good for them for that matter?

FUCK them. Leave & take every penny, every dose of medicine, every drop of clean water, every drop of fuel, every piece of computer, construction, transport & communication equipment, every bite of food EVERY single fucking thing the evil whites of the western world have brought in to this shithole.

In addition I would suggest wreck every plane & sink every boat they have, then blockade them & sink any boat coming in or leaving....

Let's see how these animals do on their own.
Dream on my little xenophobic friend.
 

rld

New member
Oct 12, 2010
10,664
2
0
The answer to that question is that they are STUPID.

I agree with those who say that Haiti (and Africa) should be left to solve their problems on their own.
In the case of Africa, perhaps if we had left them alone the mess would not nearly be as bad. I guess you don't believe in "if you break it, you buy it..."
 

themexi

Eat the Weak
Jun 12, 2006
1,270
25
48
In the case of Africa, perhaps if we had left them alone the mess would not nearly be as bad. I guess you don't believe in "if you break it, you buy it..."
Well when we WERE buying them, from OTHER AFRICANS I might add, people started to get all pissy about it......
 

slowandeasy

Why am I here?
May 4, 2003
7,232
0
36
GTA
In the case of Africa, perhaps if we had left them alone the mess would not nearly be as bad. I guess you don't believe in "if you break it, you buy it..."
Oh come on now...How long do they get to use that excuse? If onlys and buts were candies and nuts we would all have a merry christmas.
How do we know they would not nearly be as bad? What do you think was happening over in Africa before the Europeans landed??? People seem to think that
Africa was one big party with black people running around a camp fire singing, dancing, fucking and just enjoying life. The fact is that the various tribes were probably more cruel and oppressive to their own kind than the Europeans ever were. This goes the same for our Aboriginal People.
 

slowandeasy

Why am I here?
May 4, 2003
7,232
0
36
GTA
Well when we WERE buying them, from OTHER AFRICANS I might add, people started to get all pissy about it......
Yep the other Africans were more than willing to profit from those transactions. People did not start getting all pissy about it until at least a few generations later.
 

rld

New member
Oct 12, 2010
10,664
2
0
Oh come on now...How long do they get to use that excuse? If onlys and buts were candies and nuts we would all have a merry christmas.
How do we know they would not nearly be as bad? What do you think was happening over in Africa before the Europeans landed??? People seem to think that
Africa was one big party with black people running around a camp fire singing, dancing, fucking and just enjoying life. The fact is that the various tribes were probably more cruel and oppressive to their own kind than the Europeans ever were. This goes the same for our Aboriginal People.
I guess I should have been clearer. My bad.

I was talking post-colonial Africa. Right up until today.

Shall we discuss the influence of the former and current super-powers on post-colonial African nations?

Does the term "proxy wars" ring a bell?

How about a discussion of the current failure of the GATT and African development?

We can also discuss just how well Africa has been doing since the end of the Cold War and the termination of most of the proxy wars.

Anybody else following Walmart's acquisition of MassMart?
 

slowandeasy

Why am I here?
May 4, 2003
7,232
0
36
GTA
rld, you just flew right over my head. I confess, I have not done my research, but my point is and always be consistent. People have to take ownership over what they do, how they do it, and why they do it. The bad influences will always be there, whether you are the ruler of a country or a 12 year old in the playgrounds of a Toronto school.

Africa has shown progress since the end of the Cold War, but has it really progressed very far? Given the massive amount of aid that is sent to Africa, not to mention all the ex-pats that are sending money "home". There is still massive corruption and civil unrest in countries, poverty in others.

Again, the message is that everyone should take responsibility for their own actions rather than looking for someone to blame.
 

rld

New member
Oct 12, 2010
10,664
2
0
I agree that people should take responsibility for their own actions, including the superpowers who chose to finance, arm and support the vast majority of the pre-2000 dictators. African history and politics is a passion of mine and it is not well covered in our media so we can't be blamed for not knowing what is going on.

But if you take the countries around SA for instance, that the west viewed as battleground states, we saw the largest artillery battle since WWII take place in Angola between South African troops and East German and Cuban gunners. Those countries are littered with mines that were made and laid by foreign troops. The civil war in Angola stretched on for decades longer than it should have as first China, then Russia and finally the US support Savimbi against elected governments. Africa is full of similar stories. Pick a really nasty dictator (with perhaps Mugabe as the exception for about the last 6 years or so) and I can point to the country that put him in power and kept him there.

So what you effectively have (with SA and Botswana the notable sub-saharan exceptions) is a continent that until 10-20 years ago was torn apart and dominated by outside powers, who are now still making it hard for them to succeed via agricultural subsidies etc.

But things are changing. Africa is growing, the numbers of democracies is increasing and the numbers of wars decreasing. China is investing massively in Africa, and if you read FT or many economic reports you will see Africa is now growing rather well. Countries like Uganda, that were absolute disasters are becoming success stories. But it is going to take more than the oh 15 years or so of real regional autonomy and development to wash away centuries of exploitation.

And Massmart is the AFrican version of Costco, and Wallmart has just offered to buy it for $4 billion. A number of other companies are also trying to get assets in Africa as both income and consumer spending are going up faster there, than almost anywhere else in the world.

And my favourite pet peeve about African development is how the colonial powers dealt with Africa as opposed to other places. Take for instance India where the British created a well educated middle class of lawyers, doctors and accountants from the local population, which have all taken on leadership roles since independence (Ghandi was a lawyer for instance.) In Africa the colonial powers did not allow the creation of an educated professional class of Africans. So in many cases when the colonial powers left, a country with a population of say twice Canada's was left with less than 10 lawyers and accountants and a handful of doctors. Can you imagine trying to run a country without trained professionals? This is one of the reasons that there were so many soldier-dictators in Africa, there was no trained professional middle class to temper or compete with them.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts