When will it end?

dcbogey said:
In some ways I find the fact that the Ontario Human Rights Commission is supporting him the most disturbing aspect of this story.



I just checked out their web site and looked at the "commissioners". If you do the same you will understand why they ruled as they did.

That also explains all the other crap that comes from these fools.


.
 
The way I understand it, Sihks are required to wear on thier person a kirpan (symbolic knife), a steel bracelet & special short pants-like underwear. The thing about the turban, as it was explained to me was that it was used to maintin the hair & beard in well groomed orderly manner, because it is aginst their religion to cut their hair as it is a god-given part of them. I'm not sure but my friends explained that the turban itself was more utilitrian & cultural... not religiously required per se. If that is the case he cn frigging well tuck his hair under the helmet.... then when he gets where hes going he can groom it & put the turbn back on. Guys & girls with long hair do it all the time.

Can anyone clarify this for me? If it is the case that te turbn itself is utilitrian & cultural instead of prticularly religious then it would set us ll right.

Regardless.... motorcycling is NOT a right & if e's so into his beliefs he should hve NO problems signing a wiver that he will pay his own way if he hurts himself.... he seems to have the $$ (Thoug for the record I hope he doesn't hurt himself)
 
LancsLad said:
I just checked out their web site and looked at the "commissioners". If you do the same you will understand why they ruled as they did.

That also explains all the other crap that comes from these fools.


.
Ahhhhh.
 
LancsLad said:
I just checked out their web site and looked at the "commissioners". If you do the same you will understand why they ruled as they did.

That also explains all the other crap that comes from these fools.


.


Yeah.........honestly did it surprise you ( did me)
 
After reading this excerpt from the first link......

Badesha, who said he hasn't ridden his motorcycle since he was ticketed in September 2005, told the judge that 50 motorcyclists die in crashes each year in the province while wearing a helmet.

Anyone else thinking this guy will be one of the 50 this summer?
 
Hammerstein said:
Yeah.........honestly did it surprise you ( did me)


Not at all, I'm sure if one was to examine all the Gov't agencies and commissions they would find a similar trend.

.:mad:
 
Hammerstein said:
After reading this excerpt from the first link......

Badesha, who said he hasn't ridden his motorcycle since he was ticketed in September 2005, told the judge that 50 motorcyclists die in crashes each year in the province while wearing a helmet.

Anyone else thinking this guy will be one of the 50 this summer?




We can only hope its a clean hit. I don't want my tax money wasted providing medical care to that farker.


.
 
stang said:
Someone should start making really big helmets.

Could get rich quick!

Yep... there might be.... oh..i dunno.. 5 or 6 Turban wearing motorcycle riding sikhs in Ontario :p
 
a 1 player said:
The problem being, when one right or privelage is given or provided to a special group of people, it creates inequality within society. I am a firm believer of 'what's good for the goose is good for the gander'. If the laws should state that it is ok for a group to wear a turban while riding a motorcycle, the helmet law should be abolished. It is really that simple.

It really is that simple...
 
LancsLad said:
We can only hope its a clean hit. I don't want my tax money wasted providing medical care to that farker.


.


Ditto. maybe like he loses control and catapults himself into a telephone pole....... so no one else has to suffer in any way for his stupidity
 
themexi said:
The way I understand it, Sihks are required to wear on thier person a kirpan (symbolic knife), a steel bracelet & special short pants-like underwear. The thing about the turban, as it was explained to me was that it was used to maintin the hair & beard in well groomed orderly manner, because it is aginst their religion to cut their hair as it is a god-given part of them. I'm not sure but my friends explained that the turban itself was more utilitrian & cultural... not religiously required per se. If that is the case he cn frigging well tuck his hair under the helmet.... then when he gets where hes going he can groom it & put the turbn back on. Guys & girls with long hair do it all the time.

Can anyone clarify this for me? If it is the case that te turbn itself is utilitrian & cultural instead of prticularly religious then it would set us ll right.

Regardless.... motorcycling is NOT a right & if e's so into his beliefs he should hve NO problems signing a wiver that he will pay his own way if he hurts himself.... he seems to have the $$ (Thoug for the record I hope he doesn't hurt himself)

Working in tech, I have a few Sikhs from different parts of the world. There are different styles to the turbans they wear. One guy basically has a do-rag. It counts. And this dude could too.

I'm all for religious respect, being a practicing Pagan, but a decent amount of common sense is also necessary. Like this young Islamic girl who, instead of wearing a hijab, wears a hoodie. It satisfies the demands of her faith, and she doesn't stand out.

This guy deserves to be bitchslapped for his attitude, and for the money he's costing the province. Don't hide your idiocy behind your devotion, it not only makes you look bad, but your smarter, more level-headed countrymen as well.
 
LancsLad said:
We can only hope its a clean hit. I don't want my tax money wasted providing medical care to that farker.


.

I agree. Hope it also is a rainy day so most of it washes off.
 
This is a steaming pile of dog shit... I cannot believe that our tax dollars are being wasted on such an idiotic case.

Unfortunately, I think there is a precedence already in Canada... If I am not mistaken, B.C has already made this exemption!!!!!
 
slowandeasy said:
This is a steaming pile of dog shit... I cannot believe that our tax dollars are being wasted on such an idiotic case.

Unfortunately, I think there is a precedence already in Canada... If I am not mistaken, B.C has already made this exemption!!!!!

You are correct also Manitoba. Around the world otherplaces that have are Hong Kong, India ( of course) and WHAT THE BLOODY HELL..... THE UNITED KINGDOM?!?!
 
Last edited:
Weed Smoker and Human Rights

There is another story about a guy who is suing a family restaurant.

Apparently, the guy is allowed to smoke weed due to health reasons...
He smokes his weed in front of a family restaurant (right by the front doors)... He was asked by the owner to not do it in such close proximity...

He is taking the owner to court.. I believe that the Human Rights Comission is also involved...
 
Hammerstein said:
and WHAT THE BLOODY HELL..... THE UNITED KINGDOM?!?!

Those blooming idiots actually took the time out from their Diana inquiry and Royal Family fawning to pass such a law...
 
This again??? Surprise :eek:

Always somebody wanting something changed. Give an inch they want a mile. So long to the saying when in Rome do what the Romans do.