What would you do: Cashier gives you back too much

[Babypowder]

nope but im sure you have one of these permantly on you head

its a dunce cap becasue you think consent isnt relevant to a contract. dunce.

 

[fuji]

Nowhere did I say consent is not relevant to a contact. It just wasn't relevant to the case of someone giving you possession of their money in error. You are claiming they have consented to your ownership of the money and that is flat wrong when it is clear that it was given in error.

Now crawl back into your van beside the river and nod off.

 

[Babypowder]

Says who? Look this concept of "consent" isn't even very relevant here. You have an implied contract .

keep making shit up mr cone-hat-that's-not-for-birthdays.