booboobear said:
The cost should be $ 0
I don't agree with it either and in all respect Mr Jones I don't think you can expect someone to comment on the cost without also saying they either agree or don't agree with gun registry.
I am totally 100 % against it.
I've got no probs with comments, but I've also had only two 'actual' costs proposed.
As a f'rinstance: you say $0. If that was an 'actual' answer, then you are expecting the cost of the registry to be paid for by all taxpayers, out of general revenue, instead of user-pay, like car licenses, and most other such registrations. But I suspect it was a 'political' answer i.e: the cost should be nothing, because there should be no registration. Your opinion, and welcome to it, but not an answer to my question. I probably needed to phrase it better.
Try to imagine you have all your existing opinions, but you work for the government, and your boss says to you, "Our political masters, in all their questionable wisdom have decided we must register all guns and their owners. Our section has to come up with a price, a registration fee, that recovers some (or all) of the costs of getting the forms out, and processing and filing them and such. There's a partial list of requirements at the top o' the thread. Please come up with a number and have it on my desk—with reasons if you'd like—by tomorrow morning."