what if we didn't have a conservative government?
- Thread starter asterwald
- Start date
It could also be said they are mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers etc and hold a responsibility outside of being an SO that would obligate them to do their JOB.
But a truthful one. Remember any proposed law goes through House of Commons vote & then needs Senate vote. Also the Charter of Rights & Freedoms are the guide post to any laws drafted.
Conservative majority, so the house of commons is a rubber stamp. Any constitutional challange would be years in the making...so it is pretty weak protection. Even then the govt can use the not withstanding clause.
No matter what party formed the Government they would have to address certain issues: Sexual Trafficking, the public nuisance aspect of Street Walking etc. . .
I'm not entirely sure how to take your post. But reminds me of one I read not too long ago.But their job is to think of the children. For the love of Jebus somebody please think of the children.
And if that won't do it, there are those whose marxist feminist dialetic beings all the boys to the yard who think any time a female is touched by a guy its exploitation and get upset anytime a dude is happy.
Cannon to right of them,
Cannon to left of them,
Cannon in front of them
It is indeed their job to address child prostitution and human trafficking while ensuring consenting adults have the ability to engage in prostitution safety.
I try not to make assumptions, which is why I asked for clarification.
Provided I hinted to their responsibility leaning towards the "exploited" such as underage prostitution I wasn't sure if you were mocking me or simply agreeing.
Irregardless, I found your response to be much clearer.
