For me X is a horrible way to find new girls. Unless you already know about them it is up to chance if you see their profile or not. Then a lot of girls have it so you can't message them unless you pay for premium X.
Text first (with text app) and email as 2nd choiceEmail - hands down unless I have already established another way with the approval of the SP.
I can't answer your question about emails, but I can help with your problem of not having a cellphone: Some text apps (such as TextNow) allow access through a browser on a PC.... I don't have a cell phone, so I can't text. I prefer not to make phone calls on my families land line ...
I guess it would be if for some strange reason you used your personal or work email address.Never emails. It’s the most self incriminating , permanent record , that never goes awayand has the potential to resurface some day after you think it’s long forgotten and disappeared
Not that hard to make a new email for hobbling purposes.Never emails. It’s the most self incriminating , permanent record , that never goes awayand has the potential to resurface some day after you think it’s long forgotten and disappeared
If they want to find you bad enough, they can through any digital comms you make, thinking that can't happen through text or X is pretty naive but carry on!If the authorities happen to be investigating a SP for whatever their reasons might be , and they obtain a warrant for a deep dive , it will be pretty easy to find you. Thinking that can’t happen is pretty naive . But carry on
The way to "stay under the radar" is to be mindful who you reach out to. LE doesn't care about communication for the purposes of buying sex unless you're doing it on a Vanier street corner, but if that person is connected to something much worse (like sex trafficking) then your deep dive scenario is more plausible.Absolutely correct , including scooping up all the juicy detailed posts on this site. There are ways to stay under the radar, of course, but that’s a topic for another thread at another time..or maybe not
![]()