I'm just asking why you would trust trump and Hegseth.I agree it's Frankie trying to bloat the number of US killed, considering they've yet to put boots on the ground and only using air power. I do believe this would change if boots hit the ground. The number will go up and Americans I believe, will be screaming from every knoock and cranny of the shithole called USA.
No you're not! You know I don't like or trust Trump or Hegseth. You like putting out misinformation as fact to try and fit your narrative. This is what MAGA does! This is what Trump does and this is what you do.I'm just asking why you would trust trump and Hegseth.
Manipulation of casualty numbers is very common during war though as part of the information warfare.
There are still many ways to manipulate these counts though.While casualty figures are often manipulated as part of information warfare, doing so with soldier deaths specifically has become much more difficult in modern conflicts. Unlike civilian casualties which can be harder to verify, military losses occur within structured units, chains of command, and documented deployments.
When troops are deployed “boots on the ground,” their losses tend to leave multiple forms of traceable evidence. Drone footage now routinely captures direct engagements, vehicle strikes, and their aftermath. These clips are rapidly circulated on platforms like Telegram and X, where both sides and outside observers analyze them in near real time.
On top of that, open-source intelligence groups such as Oryx document visually confirmed equipment losses, which indirectly reflect personnel casualties since destroyed tanks, IFVs, and artillery almost always involve crews.
There are also institutional constraints: militaries must account for personnel internally through payroll, unit strength, and next-of-kin notifications. Even if governments delay announcements or underreport figures publicly, large discrepancies become difficult to sustain over time without affecting morale, logistics, and force readiness.
In short, while exact numbers can still be adjusted or delayed, the scale of military deaths is increasingly hard to conceal. Modern surveillance, digital evidence, and independent verification make it far more difficult than in past wars to hide significant troop losses, only to obscure their precise count temporarily.
Agreed, Hegseth publicly refuses to say how many have died.There are still many ways to manipulate these counts though.
Underreporting own casualties and inflating enemy losses is standard practice, but more importantly, a lot of what’s cited as “verification” has limits.
Drone footage and OSINT only capture what is visible and released, not total losses.
Equipment tracking doesn’t translate cleanly into personnel casualties, and both sides selectively publish footage that supports their narrative. (Example: The E3 sentry aircraft recently destroyed by an Iranian missile, was reported as "damaged" or having sustained "minor damages").
Internal data like payroll, unit strength, or casualty reporting isn’t publicly accessible in any meaningful way, so it’s not something outsiders can reliably audit in real time.
Reclassification (e.g., missing, accidents) and delayed reporting also create room to shape the narrative.
Bottom line: while it’s harder than before to completely fabricate numbers, it’s still very possible to significantly distort the picture especially in the short to medium term.
Over 200 "wounded".Agreed, Hegseth publicly refuses to say how many have died.
Their bases have been hit hard and they won't admit it either.
Of course we do! So i guess we will be targeted again by the chump regimeDo we have oil?
Time to break out the stimulus chequesTrump approval falls to 33%
![]()
‘Five Alarm Fire’: Devastating New Poll Shows Trump’s Approval Cratering to 33%
A new national poll shows Donald Trump's approval rating free falling to just 33%, the lowest of his second term as war continues to rage in Iran.www.mediaite.com
This:More food for thought
Sometimes the smartest guy in the room has to play dumb to get ahead, you don't put your brain on full display. Same with warfare, just because you're the strongest you don't show your full hand.This:
"Anybody who thinks that the US has a technological upper hand, and that American marines are somehow tougher than the Persian Revolutionary Guards is really crazy."
People seem to think that technological superiority is everything and makes America unbeatable.
If anything, these latest wars have shown us, it is that numerical superiority and morale trumps technological superiority, in asymmetric wars of attrition.
To win, Iran does not have to beat the US. They just have to survive.Sometimes the smartest guy in the room has to play dumb to get ahead, you don't put your brain on full display. Same with warfare, just because you're the strongest you don't show your full hand.
As much as Iran may have been underestimated, I'm sure the U.S. have more than meets the eye. People get wrapped up in wishful thinking.
It doesn't matter. Only boots on the ground wins.Sometimes the smartest guy in the room has to play dumb to get ahead, you don't put your brain on full display. Same with warfare, just because you're the strongest you don't show your full hand.
As much as Iran may have been underestimated, I'm sure the U.S. have more than meets the eye. People get wrapped up in wishful thinking.





