Toronto Passions
Toronto Escorts

Voters In Almost Every Riding Are Worried About Climate Change, Data Suggests

Charlemagne

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2017
15,451
2,484
113
09/07/2019 07:00 EDT

Voters In Almost Every Riding Are Worried About Climate Change, Data Suggests

A new map breaks down what Canadians believe should be done about climate change.

By Samantha Beattie

In almost every federal election riding in Canada, the majority of residents believe that climate change has already harmed their province and will continue to do so in the near future, new data suggests.

An interactive mapping tool estimates adult perceptions by riding, and reveals how climate change issues unite and divide us as October’s federal election nears. It was developed by researchers at the University of Montreal and University of California Santa Barbara.

Using more than 9,000 survey responses and validated statistical models, they estimate 83 per cent of Canadians believe the earth is warming — compared to 70 per cent of Americans, as found in a similar project out of Yale University last year.


This map shows the estimated percentage of adults in each of Canada's ridings who agree that climate change is happening.

Fifty-four per cent of Canadians support increased taxes on carbon-based fuels, and 58 per cent support a cap-and-trade system, according to the study.

“Our data shows that there might be a variety of reasons to vote for a provincial or national government, but at the root there’s a strong desire in Canada to deal with climate change,” said Matto Mildenberger, a Canadian political scientist at the University of California, who was part of the mapping project.

There were some notable differences region by region.

Quebec, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island are the only provinces where the majority of residents believe climate change will harm them personally — compared to the national average of 47 per cent. These are also the places where the greatest percentage of people think their provinces have felt the negative effects of climate change.


This map shows the estimated percentage of adults in each of Canada's ridings who agree with the statement "My province has already felt negative effects from global warming."

The majority of residents in Alberta and Saskatchewan think the earth is getting warmer, but not because of human activity. People in northern Alberta ridings have “extreme levels” of disbelief that climate change will harm them, Mildernberger said. For example, 70 per cent of adults in the federal riding of Fort McMurray-Cold Lake don’t think they’ll be personally affected, despite a devastating 2016 wildfire.

In traditionally conservative ridings, people appear to want action on climate change, said Mildenberger. “Support for climate action is not a Conservative, Liberal or NDP riding issue — it’s an issue on the minds of Canadians across the country,” he said.

In Conservative party leader Andrew Scheer’s riding Regina-Qu’Appelle, Sask., researchers estimate that the majority of residents support either a cap and trade system (57 per cent) or a carbon tax (52 per cent).


This map shows the estimated percentage of adults in each of Canada's ridings who support a carbon tax.

Scheer recently called the carbon tax imposed by the Liberals a “betrayal of trust.” His climate plan presented ahead of the election has been criticized by activists and critics as meaningless rhetoric that plays into the hands of oil lobbyists.

In Ontario Premier Doug Ford’s riding Etobicoke-North (which matches the federal riding), researchers found that about 62 per cent of residents support cap and trade, and 66 per cent support a carbon tax. Ford’s government confirmed last month it will go to the Supreme Court to fight the federal carbon tax.

https://m.huffingtonpost.ca/entry/voters-canada-climate-change_ca_5d72bc6de4b07521022c1d0c
 

glamphotographer

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2011
16,063
15,744
113
Canada
As the temperature in the south Atlantic Ocean increases due to climate change Cat 6 hurricanes will be more common.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
And then, they told them how much it is going to cost them and the worry decreased, significantly.
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,703
21
38
Goes to show the power of media propaganda.
 
O

OnTheWayOut

So this proves most Canadians are sheeple? As a socialist country the citizens are used to letting the country take care of their needs and do whatever it thinks is best for them. No surprise they would take as fact whatever their idiot leader JT tells them.
 

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
5,973
1,218
113
As the temperature in the south Atlantic Ocean increases due to climate change Cat 6 hurricanes will be more common.
Although there is great appeal for the argument, there is no evidence that hurricane activity is picking up and that hurricane events are stronger.

As far as the destruction in the U.S., development along the Southeastern coastline has simply put more people and homes in flood plains and in the paths of hurricanes.
 

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
5,973
1,218
113
And then, they told them how much it is going to cost them and the worry decreased, significantly.
Of course, people are concerned about climate change. They're bombarded with this idea by the media. It seeps into news stories that seemingly have nothing to do with climate change. It shows up in our fictional television and movies. They would be stupid to not show some concern.

As jcpro notes, once you start putting a real price tag on reducing carbon emissions that concern isn't translated into commitment. I found it interesting that the Montreal area supports carbon taxes much more than the Toronto area. That tells me the support mirrors a region's historical tendencies to support government intervention and higher taxes.
 

Darts

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2017
23,061
11,179
113
And then, they told them how much it is going to cost them and the worry decreased, significantly.
"Tax the rich!" Then they find out there aren't enough rich people to fund everything so the masses (that means you) get hit with higher taxes.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
"Tax the rich!" Then they find out there aren't enough rich people to fund everything so the masses (that means you) get hit with higher taxes.
LOL! How right that is. It's always the middle class that takes it in the ass in the end.
 

The Oracle

Pronouns: Who/Cares
Mar 8, 2004
23,478
47,218
113
On the slopes of Mount Parnassus, Greece
Of course, people are concerned about climate change. They're bombarded with this idea by the media. It seeps into news stories that seemingly have nothing to do with climate change. It shows up in our fictional television and movies. They would be stupid to not show some concern.

As jcpro notes, once you start putting a real price tag on reducing carbon emissions that concern isn't translated into commitment. I found it interesting that the Montreal area supports carbon taxes much more than the Toronto area. That tells me the support mirrors a region's historical tendencies to support government intervention and higher taxes.
I leave you with this quote.

'' The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule'' H.L. Mencken
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
82,410
18,419
113
LOL! How right that is. It's always the middle class that takes it in the ass in the end.
'Cuz billionaires like Trump just give tax breaks to the rich while fools like Ford cut services and give useless corporate tax breaks.
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,703
21
38
You mean when they report the arctic is burning, the amazon is burning and Greenland lost 200 billion tons of ice?
Classic case of conflation and exaggeration.
 

Darts

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2017
23,061
11,179
113
3 truism:

1) Cutting taxes doesn't benefit people who don't pay taxes.

2) A rising stock market doesn't benefit people who don't own stock.

3) Creating jobs doesn't benefit people who don't want to work.
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
16,682
2,384
113
You mean when they report the arctic is burning, the amazon is burning and Greenland lost 200 billion tons of ice?
And they did not report that the 200 billions tons of ice lost was in the summer & 200 billion tons grows back in the winter
Nor do they report fires in the amazon in august is a regular occurance
Nor do they report the ice mass is growing in the south pole

You just can seem to mislead others enough can you?
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
82,410
18,419
113
And they did not report that the 200 billions tons of ice lost was in the summer & 200 billion tons grows back in the winter
Nor do they report fires in the amazon in august is a regular occurance
Nor do they report the ice mass is growing in the south pole

You just can seem to mislead others enough can you?
They didn't report those things because they aren't happening.
Trying to wish them into existence won't work, larue.

Glacial melting in Antarctica may become irreversible
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jul/09/glacial-melting-in-antarctica-may-become-irreversible
 

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
26,339
6,648
113
Room 112
I leave you with this quote.

'' The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule'' H.L. Mencken
Bang on. First it was overpopulation which was threatening the food supply. Then when that was debunked it was the CO2 global warming bogeyman. Once that has been played out up next will the the water shortage crisis.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts