Dwayne Johnson is an astute businessman. He got his trademark "The Rock" back from the WWE when the head honcho was in no position to drive a hard bargain.
Dr. Stone Cold.
Dr. Stone Cold.
Man despite the current events, the Stone Cold, McMahon segments were absolute gold. Attitude Era FTW!!Dwayne Johnson is an astute businessman. He got his trademark "The Rock" back from the WWE when the head honcho was in no position to drive a hard bargain.
Dr. Stone Cold.
Dana White doesn't own Endeavor and has nothing to do with this as the poster was implying.LOL…Didn’t know you were such a fanboy for Dana White.
Are you trolling and playing dumb? Its quite clear from what you copy pasted that McMahon is an abusive old creep.82. On May 11, 2019, McMahon invited Ms. Grant to his condo again and asked her to lay in bed with him before informing her that he had ordered WWE Corporate Officer No. 4 to offer her the job, even though a job description had not been firmed up beyond a high-level summary.
83. While incredibly excited to finally receive long-awaited employment and financial security, Ms. Grant expressed to McMahon that there seemed to be a conflict between his doing this and his warning to Ms. Grant that no one could know about their closeness. He appeared amused with this, replying “It’s my company.” McMahon then undressed down to his briefs, while Ms. Grant remained clothed, and he began kissing Ms. Grant and inserting his hands into her pants without consent.
85. On May 17, 2019, Ms. Grant received an offer letter from WWE for an entry level job as “legal administrator-coordinator” with a salary of $75,000.
88. During the May 18, 2019, encounter, Ms. Grant felt coerced into engaging in sexual activity and that McMahon had trapped her an impossible situation, as she feared adverse career and personal consequences and legal retaliation if she declined his advances. McMahon stated, “This is what I have been waiting for” as he performed oral sex on Ms. Grant. Ms. Grant asked that protection be used, and McMahon responded that there was no need to worry because he was “clean.”
89. Feeling that she was being used for his gratification, Ms. Grant went numb and was unable to make eye contact. McMahon then flipped on his back and said, “Okay, jack ’em off.”
90. Disturbed by the nonconsensual sexual encounter, she hoped that McMahon would cease his advances. But his advances continued and left her to fulfill his demands or lose her job.
A few kisses and hands in the pants, and she's expecting $75000 a year without putting out for the man, so young and naive.
Whenever I pay $160 I expect sex.
Coming from to the guy who defends Hamas terrorists, I'm the one trolling?Are you trolling and playing dumb? Its quite clear from what you copy pasted that McMahon is an abusive old creep.
I dont support Hamas terrorists. I support Palestinian civilians.Coming from to the guy who defends Hamas terrorists, I'm the one trolling?
I understand you hating the idea of old guys shitting on your mother, daughter, sister, but Ms Grant isn't one of them, is she?
If she had gone to the police after he performed oral sex on her after giving her a job from the beginning, then she might qualify as a victim, but then she proceeds to have a sexual relationship with him for years, and now she's a victim? If you had read the whole thing, she was basically doing nothing in the company except having sex or getting pimped out by him while on his payroll. Sex for money, that is not prostitution to you?
Sure Hamas terrorists come out of a vacuum. That's another thread anyway.I dont support Hamas terrorists. I support Palestinian civilians.
And as far as Grant and McMahon go:
1. It is exploitation and sexual harassement for a boss to offer a job in return for sex.
2. If what she was doing was sex work, and if she was in it for the money, then he should have paid her the money he promised he would pay her. If you book a provider and won't pay her, she can actually take you to court over it. So yes, even in this case he used her in all kinds of ways, pimped her out, and then refused to pay her, what he said he would.
3. He has a history of sexual harassement and paying hush money.
4. He signed an NDA with her, that promised her $3M, and only paid her $1M, which is a violation of said NDA.
So yes, in more ways than one, she is a victim and Vince is the perp.
Nobody is #MeToo-ing her. So that is your silly right wing outrage?Sure Hamas terrorists come out of a vacuum. That's another thread anyway.
Apparently he paid her salaries for the sex, plus the bonus 1 million dollar for her discretion, the average SP charging $160 would need to fuck 6250 guys to earn that. She had it easy.
This is after all a money problem, she wants more money, consent or abuse is not an issue at all here. This is not different than me not paying my credit card and they send someone to collect payment. People just love that dumb ass Me Too angle because "some old dude shit on a young woman".
That's just what rich people do...what are you surprised?Nobody is #MeToo-ing her. So that is your silly right wing outrage?
This is about Vince being a disgusting pig all these years and not just with this girl. So yes, the abuse is an issue.
Secondly, the NDA was for 3M and he paid only 1M, thereby breaching it. So yes, both the abuse and the fact that he refused to pay her what he promised, will both fuck him in the ass, and you can sit on the sidelines throwing your little right wing tantrum.
No. This is how a lot of men think. He is not trolling at all. He has a very serious hate for women based on other threads.Are you trolling and playing dumb? Its quite clear from what you copy pasted that McMahon is an abusive old creep.
How many rich people do you know who shit on their employees head and pimp them out?That's just what rich people do...what are you surprised?