Allure Massage

'Very depressing': CIBC staff losing jobs to workers in India, expected to help train

yung_dood

Banned
Jul 2, 2011
1,697
1
0
'Very depressing': CIBC staff losing jobs to workers in India, expected to help with training
Up to 130 CIBC finance jobs will be lost due to outsourcing this year

Sophia Harris

CIBC is eliminating up to 130 jobs in its Toronto finance department and outsourcing the work to India.

As part of the transition, staff losing their positions must train other local CIBC employees. Those employees then train the workers in India who will be taking over the jobs.

Although they aren't directly training their replacements, the situation isn't sitting well with some affected staff who spoke with CBC News. They asked that their identity be protected because they fear repercussion from CIBC — one of Canada's largest banks.

"It's very, well, depressing," said one employee about having to pass on his work knowledge so that someone in another country can replace him.

"A lot of people would have rather just been let go immediately than to sort of, if you will, suffer [through this]."

"It feels like no one cares for us," said another employee. "The environment is really bad. People are bitter."

The jobs being outsourced are mainly accounting-related positions. CIBC has already let go some staff and the layoffs will continue to roll out over the course of the year.

The replacement workers in India are with the global consulting and outsourcing firm, Accenture, which is partnering with CIBC.

$1.4B profit for CIBC

The bank says it has found jobs for 36 displaced staff and is making every effort to find work for others.

But the employees that CBC News spoke with say they feel the bank is more interested in raking in profits than helping them out.

"They want to get rid of us no matter what, because we are old or something," said one worker who claims many of the employees facing layoffs are middle-aged or older.

She said CIBC pulled in a $1.4 billion profit in the last quarter and is still outsourcing jobs to save money. "They said it's cheaper labour and it's 24 hours, because when we are sleeping, they are working."

Another employee said he could accept his layoff if his job had been outsourced to another Canadian company. But he believes sending the work offshore is going too far.

"You have to draw the line somewhere, especially when you're talking about the types of profits that these companies are making," he said. "You're taking these good-paying jobs out of the Canadian economy."

When asked why it's outsourcing the work, CIBC suggested it's a common practice.

"Like most large companies, we selectively outsource," spokesperson Caroline Van Hasselt said in an email.

CIBC currently has 43,000 employees and has created almost 2,500 jobs in Canada over the past five years, she added.

Everybody does it

Many Canadian corporations outsource work to other countries, said Ron Babin, with the Ted Rogers School of Management at Ryerson University.

"It's the way of the world. It's how companies remain efficient, it's how they remain competitive, it's how they keep their cost

Although outsourcing is a routine business practice, Babin said it still generates negative attention when people lose their jobs.

"It's a sad story," he said. "You hate to see something bad happen to good people."

In 2013, Royal Bank of Canada faced a tidal wave of criticism following a CBC News report that 45 of its IT employees were being replaced by cheaper workers from India employed by global outsourcing firm, iGATE.

RBC brought several of the replacement workers to Canada, prompting an employee to complain that they had to directly train them to take their jobs.

CIBC says none of its offshore workers are setting foot on Canadian soil.

RBC crossed a line by bringing foreign workers to Canada to be trained by staff facing layoffs, Babin said.

"That was callous, I would say, and I think RBC has learned from that."

RBC won't offshore jobs for money

RBC reacted to the backlash at the time by pledging to never outsource a Canadian job to another country solely to save money.

"RBC will not offshore work where salary savings is the primary reason and will make every effort to source in Canada," the bank said in a statement.

The bank's then-CEO Gord Nixon also published an open letter in national newspapers, apologizing to affected employees.

"We should have been more sensitive and helpful to them," he said, adding that the workers would all be offered comparable job opportunities at RBC.

The CIBC employees that CBC News spoke with also hope that the bank will have a change of heart and do something to guarantee their jobs.

"How are we supposed to make a living?" says one employee who worries about not being able to land a comparable job. "We have family, we have expenses to take care of."

http://www.cbc.ca/beta/news/business/cibc-outsourcing-jobs-india-1.4045759
 

HOLLYWOODG

Well-known member
Dec 11, 2016
1,210
44
48
CIBC like every other business has a mandate to maximize profits. This is not a charity. To think of the sense of entitlement these CIBC staff have. Sheesh.
 

frankcastle

Well-known member
Feb 4, 2003
17,879
242
63
CIBC like every other business has a mandate to maximize profits. This is not a charity. To think of the sense of entitlement these CIBC staff have. Sheesh.
You'd think people working in a bank would understand business and economics.
 

yung_dood

Banned
Jul 2, 2011
1,697
1
0
CIBC like every other business has a mandate to maximize profits. This is not a charity. To think of the sense of entitlement these CIBC staff have. Sheesh.
The CBC is actually supposed to be s public servuce first and foremost, I'm not saying that they don't have a profit motive.as well though.
 

onceaday

New member
Sep 28, 2015
348
0
0
Those who actually have experience in this understand that off-shoring does not hold up as a business case in the long term for financial institutions nor many IT businesses. Looks good on paper, but is a huge distraction to the organization and the perceived benefits are not sustainable amidst the loss of day to day functionality. Been there, done that. Wouldn't do it again. RBC and many other companies have found this out the hard way.

CIBC like every other business has a mandate to maximize profits. This is not a charity. To think of the sense of entitlement these CIBC staff have. Sheesh.
 

dirkd101

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2005
10,401
183
63
eastern frontier
As a Canadian company that has seen great profits over many years, even during the economic downturn, it's shameful that they would do this. I get the business model, profit driven, accountable to the shareholders, etc. But, the aggravation that their clients have to endure, in dealing with people who's first language isn't English, who read from a script and who don't know me from the next guy. No thanks! I've done this a couple of times and refuse to deal in this manner. People who told me I had to do W instead of X, because that's what the script says, and there is no dealing with them if it goes off the scripted lines, as there is no improv, which would be an understanding of the client and their needs. I deal directly with my manager, who knows me, who knows what's going on in my life and understands my needs and knows my financial acumen.

I am no Liberal, but I like what Trudeau said when he talked about the record profits some companies, many Canadian, are making right here in this country. He asked the question that if they are making such great profits, where is their investment back into this country where the profits came from. This is a case in point for just such a thing.
 

uncleji

Active member
Jan 19, 2004
753
181
43
California + Toronto
All CEOs of big corporations are incentivized to maximize profit. Everything is skewed towards higher margins for the company and shareholders. No CEO ever saw his salary or bonus go up for giving back to his/her country. No shareholder has ever applauded the CEO for reducing his dividend so that jobs could come back into the country. At the end of the day MONEY is the only thing that matters to all concerned. Sad, but true.
 

Promo

Active member
Jan 10, 2009
2,480
0
36
Was reading the comments in the original post about RBC. I 100% guarantee that RBC is outsourcing many 100s of jobs in several departments today and they've been doing it for years. So have most of the banks. I know that many larger Enterprises have been doing it for years. The nasty stories I could tell you about a major food retailer and several other companies that I've seen first-hand. I don't think the average Canadian is aware of the things many Cdn companies are doing in regards to exploiting loopholes in the law that allows corporations to bring non-Canadians into Canada, cram several into a hotel room for 3 and 6 month periods, have them work 6 day work-weeks of 10 hours each and then bring the next batch in.

Most people think of outsourcing as Indian Help Desks. However the outsourced jobs have become truly global in "centers of excellence" (Korea, Vietnam, Philippines, England, Ireland, Brazil, South Africa, etc.) and involve jobs like network/compute operations, software development, basic accounting, law clerk, claims processing, graphic design, sales lead generation, inside sales desk, customer service management, background checks, preparation/filing of paperwork (for mortgages, auto leasing, etc.). Not all out-sourced jobs are off-shore, as mentioned above several large companies bring resources to Canada for rolling 3 terms.

In my experience several of these countries provide talented resources, that can work independently and effectively and will deliver. However about half have lower productivity, require constant supervision and their work is error prone. Outsourcing doesn't always have a favourable business model and many US companies have brought the jobs back on-shore, but at lower pay levels for the locals.
 

onceaday

New member
Sep 28, 2015
348
0
0
@Promo, great comments. The one solution I can live with is called "right-shoring." This involves moving some operations out of a highly populated area to other regions in the Province/Country where real estate is significantly less expensive, employment demos are good, and cultural fit is natural. This reduces costs (IMO more so than off-shoring), doesn't rattle as many cages internally/externally, and keeps the wages in Canada.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,555
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
Fuji will be along shortly to explain to you why this is good for Canada....
 

Promo

Active member
Jan 10, 2009
2,480
0
36
@Promo, great comments. The one solution I can live with is called "right-shoring." This involves moving some operations out of a highly populated area to other regions in the Province/Country where real estate is significantly less expensive, employment demos are good, and cultural fit is natural. This reduces costs (IMO more so than off-shoring), doesn't rattle as many cages internally/externally, and keeps the wages in Canada.
I agree 100% - win-win in all cases except for the unfortunate staff who lose their jobs. The company I work with has ~500 Help Desk staff in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia and it's growing. The local gov'ts have programs where they will help you find buildings with the needed infrastructure (high-speed Internet, redundant power), assist in finding staff, provide training incentives and even offer zero interest financing for start-up costs. So far it's worked out very well for us. The locals are smart and savvy, have good work ethics, work issues to completion with minimum supervision, follow procedures and are loyal (low turn-over).

Pay is lower than GTA/Montreal/Ottawa so we can be more competitive, although still can't touch the offshore providers (I hate Tata!). That said, we get better productivity with the east-coasters, better customer satisfaction survey results, better 1st call resolution numbers and fewer call-backs .... and with many companies looking to bring services back to Canada/USA, we have a good business case to offer. My particular division doesn't use them as we are tech-heavy, but I'm currently looking into using them for quality call-backs and follow-ups to reduce costs.
 

Promo

Active member
Jan 10, 2009
2,480
0
36
Fuji will be along shortly to explain to you why this is good for Canada....
There are situations that offshore outsourcing indeed makes business sense and the quality is more than sufficient to meet business requirements. Offshoring is not going to go away. For example a British company I work with (and we are trying to buy) offers an engineering and operations team and end-user call center that provides superb Unified Communications and collaboration management services. Their cost is about 30% cheaper than Cdn companies and the service exceeds the already high SLAs.

I realize your post was just another Fuji troll, but your point is still wrong.
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,768
3
0
CIBC like every other business has a mandate to maximize profits. This is not a charity. To think of the sense of entitlement these CIBC staff have. Sheesh.
Do you remember the period of boycott South Africa? Not only were boycott resolutions constantly offered at annual meetings (even though they would and did affect profits), but indeed some Corporations even put representatives of the boycott movement on their board of directors (who had no particular qualifications) in an attempt to get on the right side of the movement.

A long way of getting to: publicly held corporations many times do not attempt to maximize profits when doing so will cause them significant public relations difficulties.
 

JackBurton

Well-known member
Jan 5, 2012
1,950
776
113
I feel bad for anyone that loses their jobs to outsourcing. However, expecting to have a job and a corporation that will take care of you and your needs is outdated thinking. The bank is trying to maximize profits and this is how the world works now. It's not 1975 and having a job at ford for life. Everyone's job is tenuous, job security is something you better not expect.

I don't have a problem with the bank eliminating those jobs but it is poor optics to make the employees train their replacements. That's a bit of an insult. What I do take issue with is CEO packages and salaries. If you need to cut, start at the top. Anyone else read that the 4 hydro executives take home a total of 11 million while poor people across the province get their electricity shut off?
 

Insidious Von

My head is my home
Sep 12, 2007
40,354
7,670
113
On paper it makes sense, in practice it's unethical.

This is not the first time CIBC has done this, 130 jobs is small compared to the massive outsource they pulled off in 2014. It may maximize profits but tends to turn off the clients in the long run. Anyone that has dealt with Bell Customer Service knows what a horror show that is!
 

yomero5

Well-known member
Jan 12, 2017
1,977
490
83
Yes, it is unethical. Wouldn't it be nice if our government put Canada first, and mandated that jobs should go to to Canadians first before outsourcing, or hiring temporary foreign workers. Or charge a tax for employers who want to hire a non-Canadian citizen or resident.
 

Promo

Active member
Jan 10, 2009
2,480
0
36
CIBC like every other business has a mandate to maximize profits. This is not a charity. To think of the sense of entitlement these CIBC staff have. Sheesh.
It's not always just about the shareholders or the long-term best interests of the corporation. Often decisions are made by senior managers as a short-term method to secure their bonuses.

Normally you would want to believe that executive bonuses are aligned with corporate goals; and in most cases they are, but how those goals are achieved are left to the executives. If for example an executive can achieve their 20% yearly bonus based on the business goal of reducing departmental costs by 5%, often the solution is to reduce staff and either expect the existing staff to pick-up the workload or outsource the deliverables. For example outsourcing IT operations and internal Help Desk can reduce an Enterprise's equivalent costs by 10-25% within 3 months. However there may be a reduction in IT availability and/or employee productivity due to accepted compromises in SLOs. The Executives get their bonuses, but corporate long term productivity may be reduced or relationships with end-customers impacted.

This thread is about Outsourcing, but another growing trend is not hiring employees, but instead contracting staff. Corporations can contract staff, often at the same pay as existing staff, but without having to pay benefits, vacation or sick time, training costs/time and with fixed exit costs. Typically this saves a company 10-15% each year and gives them cost effective options if they have to cut staff quickly. People often don't have choice other than to sign these contracts as today it's an employer's market in many fields. If their SO has a good benefits package, it's often considered an okay compromise.
 
Toronto Escorts