Who was it again that signed NAFTA?Asterix said:It becomes a conservative issue when one of their own shoots down the assumption that "free trade" and the current direction of the US economy will continue to benefit most Americans. He clearly indicates his belief that the GOP and the administration are effectively lying to American citizens about where this will lead, and that they could give a rip about how many people get sucked under. Again, this from one of their own.
"Misled by propaganda "free trade" claims, Americans will be at a loss to understand the increasing career frustration of the college educated. Falling pay and rising prices of foreign made goods will squeeze US living standards as the declining dollar heralds America's descent into a has-been economy."
"Meanwhile the Grand Old Party has passed a bankruptcy "reform" that is certain to turn unemployed Americans living on debt and beset with unpayable medical bills into indentured servants of the credit card companies. The steely-faced Bush administration is making certain that Americans will experience to the full their country's fall."
Free trade is not a "cons" issue, there are many on both sides of the isle that would like to clamp down on nations who dump cheap goods here, luckily cooler (and more intelligent) heads have prevailed to date.
I see a direct parallel to the "Dobbs" hysteria about China and what happened in the 70s and 80s with Japan and the Auto industry.
OTB