x.com
x.com
BREAKING: NY Attorneys General Leticia James just announced she is suing Elon Musk and DOGE for accessing the American people’s private data. This is huge.
update - more ass beatings for the Orange Fuckus
- Thread starter mandrill
- Start date
x.com
BREAKING: NY Attorneys General Leticia James just announced she is suing Elon Musk and DOGE for accessing the American people’s private data. This is huge.
x.com
x.com
BREAKING: US District Judge Tanya Chutkan has just called a 4pm hearing on whether Elon Musk has the authority to lead DOGE for the Government. Thoughts?
Last edited:
REPUBLICANS MOVE TO IMPEACH "ACTIVISTS" JUDGES House Republicans are drafting articles of impeachment against judges who blocked key policies of Trump and Elon’s
@DOGE
. Rep. Eli Crane (R-AZ) targets Judge Paul Engelmayer for halting DOGE’s Treasury access, while Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-GA) aims at Judge John McConnell Jr. for pausing federal funding freezes.
@elonmusk
is advocating for a “wave of judicial impeachments” to stop activist judges from obstructing much-needed government reforms. Will Congress take action? Sources: Fox News, WSJ,
@LeadingReport
@DOGE
. Rep. Eli Crane (R-AZ) targets Judge Paul Engelmayer for halting DOGE’s Treasury access, while Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-GA) aims at Judge John McConnell Jr. for pausing federal funding freezes.
@elonmusk
is advocating for a “wave of judicial impeachments” to stop activist judges from obstructing much-needed government reforms. Will Congress take action? Sources: Fox News, WSJ,
@LeadingReport
We did tell everyone that they were serious about the takeover.
Purging the judiciary and making it a rubber stamp outfit that doesn't stop El Presidente from wielding supreme power was always in the cards.
x.com
x.com
BREAKING: Federal judge says that Trump’s transgender care ban is UNCONSTITUTIONAL in ‘multiple ways’ including Undermining Congress’ control over federal spending.
x.com
x.com
NEW: The DC Court of Appeals has blocked Donald Trump from illegally firing Special Counsel Hampton Dellinger, the federal government’s top ethics enforcer.
RETWEET if you stand with Dellinger against Trump!
If there's a 2/3 vote requirement for impeaching a judge, they can't get there.
Plus, they'd have to impeach the entire Federal Court bench and replace it with unqualified lackeys.
x.com
x.com
A Republican lawmaker has introduced a bill to make Trump’s birthday a federal holiday. They refer to Trump as a “founder” and compare him to George Washington.
Isn't it just more ass-licking from the grovellers?
Oh, removal of a federal judge is basically impossible.
But if they can cause a lot of smoke by impeaching a bunch of them, they can point to it and insist there must be fire.
Yes.x.com
A Republican lawmaker has introduced a bill to make Trump’s birthday a federal holiday. They refer to Trump as a “founder” and compare him to George Washington.
Isn't it just more ass-licking from the grovellers?
Partly it is to show loyalty and suck up to the boss, but remember a fuck ton of what they do is for the media narrative.
After all, they will be blocked from doing it by the perfidious Democrats who are pawns of the Deep State.
Propaganda and pressure does a lot for them.
They already do that.
Judges don't give a fuck and will continue to beat the shit out of Trump.
We hope so.
But that kind of pressure leads to more and more threats of physical violence these days.
I don't think it is wise to ignore that.
They're still human beings.
Over half of judges report threats, environment affecting mental health - The National Judicial College
Founded in 1963, The National Judicial College is the nation’s leading provider of judicial education. Our mission remains as relevant as ever.
www.judges.org
'Perverse situation': Judge finds Trump action to be 'unconstitutional in multiple ways'
A judge on Sunday found that one of President Donald Trump's executive orders is unconstitutional for multiple reasons.
U.S. District Court Judge Lauren King was previously reported to have blocked Trump with a temporary restraining order targeting his executive order seeking to end all federal funding for hospitals providing gender-affirming care to children.
Now, King has found that the order "is unconstitutional in multiple ways, including usurping Congress' power of the purse," according to Kyle Cheney, senior legal affairs reporter for Politico.
Cheney added, "The judge says Trump's EO on transgender health care would create a perverse situation in which a cisgender person could get puberty blockers to treat cancer but a transgender person could not get puberty blockers to treat cancer."
Recommended Links:
A judge on Sunday found that one of President Donald Trump's executive orders is unconstitutional for multiple reasons.
U.S. District Court Judge Lauren King was previously reported to have blocked Trump with a temporary restraining order targeting his executive order seeking to end all federal funding for hospitals providing gender-affirming care to children.
Now, King has found that the order "is unconstitutional in multiple ways, including usurping Congress' power of the purse," according to Kyle Cheney, senior legal affairs reporter for Politico.
Cheney added, "The judge says Trump's EO on transgender health care would create a perverse situation in which a cisgender person could get puberty blockers to treat cancer but a transgender person could not get puberty blockers to treat cancer."
Recommended Links:
- 'Unlikely to survive legal battles': Trump facing a wave of failed initiatives
- Latest Headlines - Raw Story
- Trump administration guts sex misconduct policy for schools: report
- 'Press releases with nicer stationery': Experts debate Trump executive orders' legality
- 'Illegal stuff': Experts warn Trump’s 'day one' plans are 'blatantly unconstitutional'
x.com
x.com
If you’re not confirmed by the Senate then you have no business meddling in the lives of MILLIONS of Americans
We are suing DOGE for violating the constitution & illegally seizing power
x.com
x.com
Judge Ho steps back to explain why DOJ can’t just dismiss the case itself
A Rule 48 motion requires judicial approval for a reason. It’s “intended as a power to check power.” The bar is high to deny. It must be “clearly contrary to the manifest public interest.”
The quid pro quo deal regarding the Adams charges stinks so badly that the judge steps in and directs the DoJ lawyers and Adams' lawyer to show cause why the DoJ should not be compelled to continue the prosecution under judicial scrutiny and with the prosecutors law licences at stake.
Trump's move to end birthright citizenship suffers another setback
US appeals court rejects Trump's emergency bid to... | Daily Mail Online
President Donald Trump's move to end birthright citizenship nationwide as part of his hardline crackdown on immigration and illegal border crossings suffered a setback on Wednesday.
The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals let stand an order blocking Trump from curtailing automatic birthright citizenship despite the Trump administration's request to halt the nationwide injunction.
Seattle-based U.S. District Judge John Coughenour had issues the injunction halting the president's executive order - which Trump signed on his first day back in the White House on January 20.
It directed U.S. agencies to refuse to recognize the citizenship of children born in the United States if neither their mother nor father was a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident.
Coughenour had declared that the policy unconstitutional, but the Trump administration claimed he went too far by issuing a nationwide injunction at the behest of four Democratic-led states.
On Wednesday, the three-judge panel ruled that the Trump administration had 'not made a "strong showing that [they are] likely to succeed on the merits of this appeal."'
U.S. Circuit Judge Danielle Forrest, who Trump appointed during his first term, in a concurring opinion said a rapid ruling would risk eroding public confidence in judges who must 'reach their decisions apart from ideology or political preference.'
'Nor do the circumstances themselves demonstrate an obvious emergency where it appears that the exception to birthright citizenship urged by the Government has never been recognized by the judiciary,' she wrote.
President Donald Trump's move to end birthright citizenship nationwide as part of his hardline crackdown on immigration and illegal border crossings suffered a setback on Wednesday
Trump vows to end birthright citizenship for illegal immigrants
US appeals court rejects Trump's emergency bid to... | Daily Mail Online
President Donald Trump's move to end birthright citizenship nationwide as part of his hardline crackdown on immigration and illegal border crossings suffered a setback on Wednesday.
The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals let stand an order blocking Trump from curtailing automatic birthright citizenship despite the Trump administration's request to halt the nationwide injunction.
Seattle-based U.S. District Judge John Coughenour had issues the injunction halting the president's executive order - which Trump signed on his first day back in the White House on January 20.
It directed U.S. agencies to refuse to recognize the citizenship of children born in the United States if neither their mother nor father was a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident.
Coughenour had declared that the policy unconstitutional, but the Trump administration claimed he went too far by issuing a nationwide injunction at the behest of four Democratic-led states.
On Wednesday, the three-judge panel ruled that the Trump administration had 'not made a "strong showing that [they are] likely to succeed on the merits of this appeal."'
U.S. Circuit Judge Danielle Forrest, who Trump appointed during his first term, in a concurring opinion said a rapid ruling would risk eroding public confidence in judges who must 'reach their decisions apart from ideology or political preference.'
'Nor do the circumstances themselves demonstrate an obvious emergency where it appears that the exception to birthright citizenship urged by the Government has never been recognized by the judiciary,' she wrote.
President Donald Trump's move to end birthright citizenship nationwide as part of his hardline crackdown on immigration and illegal border crossings suffered a setback on Wednesday
Trump vows to end birthright citizenship for illegal immigrants
Most judges love the status quo above all else. They don't care whether a president is GOP or a Dem. What they WANT most of all is unaccountable power. Preserving the status quo does that for them. Judges are not servants of the people. They prefer to rule the people. That's why the check and balance is the power of the President to make appointments to SCOTUS - to straighten out the petty tyrants below.
