Unprotected oral sex is being blamed for the rise of 'super gonorrhoea'

ravencroft

Eternally pseudo-retired
Jul 2, 2005
705
100
28
The biggest problem with some of these STIs is that they don't always produce symptoms and yet can still damage you long-term. It would be one thing if you got a random BJ and your dick was set ablaze (you'd be hard pressed NOT to realize you caught something), but Chlamydia and Gonorrhea can be asymptomatic and still damaging you (oral / cervical cancer, sterility, etc.). I got the shock of my life like 5 years ago when I tested positive for Chlamydia (the first and only time in my 18+ years of testing I came back positive), and I had ZERO symptoms - no burning while urinating, no discharge, etc. It was a confounding time to say the least, but thankfully one pop of pills and follow-up testing later and I was back on track.

Does it make me more leery of unprotected oral sex while hobbying? Yes. Have I been stupid enough to succumb to said activities again? Yes. Did I get tested again after an appropriate window of time (10 days min for Chlamydia, I think it's 7 for gonorrhea)? Yes.

I will try to eventually stop altogether, and lately have been resigning myself to HJs only (which can still be fun with the right provider). Good luck out there and stay safe!
 

dbiz2

Member
Dec 5, 2015
349
22
18
USA
You are not convincing. Still no recent stats. It appears if WHO refuses to state the number of cases of the totally resistant strain. Instead they chose confuse the issue including the partial partial resistant strains (your Hawaii cases- 7 seven cases which were all successfully treated) and indeed with overall numbers for the disease. I am not impressed with them repeating themselves ever 2 years in press conferences without full disclosure. Don't me start about stats of how many cases resulted from oral vs intercourse.

WHO is all about Shock and Awe and creating publicity. Since nobody listen to them on flu any more after that debacle I guess the they are worried about relevancy.
The World Health Organization (WHO) is the body of the United Nations (UN) responsible for directing and coordinating health. As such WHO has come to play a vital role as an actor in the field of international public health and international public health policy. Infectious disease and health crises are not contained with a particular country's borders. Cross-national cooperation is critical. If you looked at the above links I gave on a previous post, the WHO has conducted a six year study of the data that shows strong percentage increases in the number of cases in over 70+ nations. One factor in reading the information is that the absolute numbers are not given, so it would take only a few cases over time to result in a large percentage increase. Given the regularity of international travel however, it in not far fetch to say that making the world aware of the potentiality of a international health crisis falls under the WHO's purview.

Anyway, like any other publicly available study and published results, one can make use of the information as they want. But I don't need a fireman to come to my door and say, "don't play with matches near your drapes. You could burn your house down," after I've been made aware of the consequences. I can chose to adjust my behavior or not.

That's what free will is all about...
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,010
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
You are not convincing. Still no recent stats. It appears if WHO refuses to state the number of cases of the totally resistant strain. Instead they chose confuse the issue including the partial partial resistant strains (your Hawaii cases- 7 seven cases which were all successfully treated) and indeed with overall numbers for the disease. I am not impressed with them repeating themselves ever 2 years in press conferences without full disclosure. Don't me start about stats of how many cases resulted from oral vs intercourse.

WHO is all about Shock and Awe and creating publicity. Since nobody listen to them on flu any more after that debacle I guess the they are worried about relevancy.
I don't think you're being reasonable. Yes it's likely the number of cases out there is pretty small. But it's not zero and it's obviously spread to multiple continents. So it's out there.

The purpose of the WHO announcement is to educate people in advance of it spreading like wild fire.

By your way of thinking WHO shouldn't announce anything until it's too late, which seems to be pointless.

BTW, the vaccination campaign that was kicked off in response to the flu warning seems to be the primary reason why it didn't become a catastrophe, so that's a win.
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,696
21
38
This really sucks. I can't live without bbbj.
 

HOLLYWOODG

Well-known member
Dec 11, 2016
1,210
44
48
I hope more service providers are as honest as Violette about not wanting to provide bbbj. To me it's a must and I really think this story is overblown. YOLO in my opinion.
 

SkyRider

Banned
Mar 31, 2009
17,572
2
0
Yes it's likely the number of cases out there is pretty small. But it's not zero and it's obviously spread to multiple continents. So it's out there.
Be sure to wear a helmet when you leave the house.
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,768
3
0
Here comes the resurgence of mild silver protein (Argyrol).

By the way still used on the eyes of newborns.
 

Brill

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2008
8,679
1,193
113
Toronto
DATY is still safe right?

would "suck" having to wear a dam. DATY is the only way I know to make a woman orgasm with 100% success. I've never made them cum by virtue of my cock alone.

I read some articles in passing about DATY being linked to throat cancer but nothing concrete. From my readings it seems safe to perform in terms of STDs too.
Fingering works better than a cock, but make sure there are no sharp edges to snag her. No worries about staying hard or dealing with STDs.
 

LickingGravity

New member
Sep 9, 2010
962
0
0
I don't think you're being reasonable. Yes it's likely the number of cases out there is pretty small. But it's not zero and it's obviously spread to multiple continents. So it's out there.

The purpose of the WHO announcement is to educate people in advance of it spreading like wild fire.

By your way of thinking WHO shouldn't announce anything until it's too late, which seems to be pointless.

BTW, the vaccination campaign that was kicked off in response to the flu warning seems to be the primary reason why it didn't become a catastrophe, so that's a win.
I think your memory is suspect. The swine flu died before a majority of the vaccine doses were even produced and in countries that never the vaccine in the first place. Canada, for one, dumped millions of unwanted doses . A lot of people routinely get vaccinated for regular flu each year and it kills a lot more than swine every did. What about bird flu? Even more deadly apparently. Another one of WHO's "Chicken Little" acts of 5 or 6 years ago. It died out without anybody getting vaccinated.

As far this case goes, WHO held the exact same press conference 2 year or more ago. That haven't presented new evidence about any spread of "super" variety in latest press conference other than perhaps an increase in the common garden variety of the disease . Until they present some real credible facts or somebody else with a better track record confirms it (like CDC) I am not about to treat as anything more than the political grandstanding that WHO is known for.
 

lomotil

Well-known member
Mar 14, 2004
6,612
1,486
113
Oblivion
Japan is mentioned as one of the countries by the WHO. I knew a lady about two years ago visiting from Japan who was promiscuous and very blase and indifferent about the fact that she knew of two guys in Toronto that she had infected with chlamydia and n.gonorrhoea. Both gentleman took several months and several antibiotic combination to knock the gonorrhoea down. With travel and the way the winds bow in the GTA, 'super gonorrhoea'' is likely here already, as not all of those infected seek treatment and are known to Public Health.
 

GPIDEAL

Prolific User
Jun 27, 2010
23,356
13
38
Japan is mentioned as one of the countries by the WHO. I knew a lady about two years ago visiting from Japan who was promiscuous and very blase and indifferent about the fact that she knew of two guys in Toronto that she had infected with chlamydia and n.gonorrhoea. Both gentleman took several months and several antibiotic combination to knock the gonorrhoea down. With travel and the way the winds bow in the GTA, 'super gonorrhoea'' is likely here already, as not all of those infected seek treatment and are known to Public Health.
I hope you're wrong, but you could be right, even one case is too many.

BTW, as an avid reader of JFK Assassination material, I learned recently that Lee Harvey Oswald contracted Gonorrhea when he was stationed in Japan as a Marine working at the Atsugi Naval Base where they flew U-2 spy planes from. They say he got it from attractive Japanese hostesses working at bars.
 

james t kirk

Well-known member
Aug 17, 2001
24,065
3,956
113
I'm more worried about my 1 in 2 chances of developing cancer in my lifetime than HIV, Super Gonorrhoea, Syphillis, and chlamydia and herpes combined.

I always marvel at how people FREAK OUT about AIDS and we get charity'd to death with respect to HIV and such and yet 50% of the people out there will develop cancer and more than half of them will die from it.
 

Celticman

Into Ties and Tail
Aug 13, 2009
8,917
88
48
Durham & Toronto
I'm more worried about my 1 in 2 chances of developing cancer in my lifetime than HIV, Super Gonorrhoea, Syphillis, and chlamydia and herpes combined.

I always marvel at how people FREAK OUT about AIDS and we get charity'd to death with respect to HIV and such and yet 50% of the people out there will develop cancer and more than half of them will die from it.
Good perspective
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
27,220
5,341
113
I'm more worried about my 1 in 2 chances of developing cancer in my lifetime than HIV, Super Gonorrhoea, Syphillis, and chlamydia and herpes combined.

I always marvel at how people FREAK OUT about AIDS and we get charity'd to death with respect to HIV and such and yet 50% of the people out there will develop cancer and more than half of them will die from it
Pancreatic cancer will kill you a helluva lot faster then HIV too.

6 months and you're toast. And it's not a fun way to die
 

LickingGravity

New member
Sep 9, 2010
962
0
0
I don't think you're being reasonable. Yes it's likely the number of cases out there is pretty small. The purpose of the WHO announcement is to educate people in advance of it spreading like wild fire.

.
It's 3 cases this year (according to one of the articles), none in North America. It's been 6 years since it identified so it hasn't exactly spreading like wildfire. WHO has learn to be more forthcoming if they don't want the "boy who cried wolf" reputation. Not to mention the reputation of being wrong more often than right.

And how exactly do they know it was oral sex the was the cause of any of the superbug cases, or for that matter the increase in the run-of-the-mill variety.

WHO purpose in life seems to be to lobby for "their" causes which in this case is not bad because it, I think, to provide pressure to for governments or pharma companies to develop an alternative ,cheap , drug to deal with this. Their hurdles are that there are few cases the Pharma companies would never make this a priority without pressure. Also the most likely users are, right now, going to probably be in Arica and South East Asia so who is going to pay?

I wish they reset their priorities to something far more deadly and prevalent and be more open and honest.
 

Jasmine Raine

Well-known member
Jul 28, 2014
4,045
49
48
These articles I am reading are all worldwide talk, but I haven't seen anything related to Canada specifically. I would like to see data on that.

Don't get me wrong, I see the reasons to be worried, but geography does play a small part in this and that is what I would like to know.
 

username999

Member
Sep 20, 2010
230
0
16
If you are worried about it then just use something like skyn elite - to me it is hard to tell the difference between bbbj.
 

IRIS

Supporting Member
Feb 18, 2010
5,484
355
83
iris4men.escortbook.com
Pancreatic cancer will kill you a helluva lot faster then HIV too.

6 months and you're toast. And it's not a fun way to die
I quote from Lord of the war:

"Why would you worry about something that can kill you in ten years, where there are so many things that can kill you today?"

Yes , everyone who has sex life can be infected , except if you are a mouse who is going to the same hole in the past 40 years.
Yes the risk is higher, when you related in this business, but I made my choice. If I need risk free life, I will choose a different job.

[url=https://postimage.org][/URL]
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts