Mirage Escorts

Ukraine updates

Status
Not open for further replies.

NotADcotor

His most imperial galactic atheistic majesty.
Mar 8, 2017
7,260
4,898
113
Unfortunately nuke make the world a lot dangerous place …there no second chance for you and me or for the plebs. Meanswhile the important government’s official and families members and the important military personnel are safe in a bunker. And the billionaire have their private safe bunker from nuclear holcoast!

PS. Once the nuclear genie is released…there no coming back or a reset button for rest of us plebs.
No, there is a reason why the plans are to put the president on an airplane when the balloon goes up. Known locations plus big and potentially accurate bombs, plus ground burst and perhaps multiple hits... Also you have to actually get there. As for Billionaires, sure they got bunkers... well a few of them do but again, it doesn't do much good unless you are there when the fecal matter hits the ventilation system. Also when you get out, it's going to suck [much less then if you were not there]. Also there will be plebs who actually have to follow the orders, plebs with families who are probably not protected, plebs who will wonder how shitty life will be after they leave the bunkers... assuming they got to the bunker and assuming the bunkers wasn't hit with several MT of love.

Add to that going down as the greatest mass murderer since Adolf Hitler, to quote Dr Strangelove. Most people in power care about their legacy, not as if they need more wealth and power.

Which is why your fantasy of Poutine tossing nukes around and then reacting to a conventional counter attack with moar nukes is again insane.
 

NotADcotor

His most imperial galactic atheistic majesty.
Mar 8, 2017
7,260
4,898
113
Oversupply of semiconductor that have happened! In Business , there is a supply and demand curve ! Demand drop off due to covid19 shutdown in China “World factories” ! And in USA & EU demand fell due to inflation and possibly of recession !
I must of have missed the part where the Chinese economy actually tanked because of the covid shutdowns.They were localized and short term.
Ditto for the west, still waiting for that recession.

You could google that yourself, but you will just read wackjob websites so why bother.

Yeah those covid lockdowns really crushed Chinese production I tell you what.

GDP growth
  • Increase
    8.4% (2021)[4]
  • Increase
    3.0% (2022)[4]
  • Increase
    5.2% (2023f)[4]
  • Increase
    4.5% (2024f)

ANd Merica
  • Increase
    2.1% (2022)[6]
  • Increase
    1.6% (2023f)[6]
  • Increase
    1.1% (2024f)
 

NotADcotor

His most imperial galactic atheistic majesty.
Mar 8, 2017
7,260
4,898
113
He is smarter than the Ukrainians who gave up their nuclear weapons for the western "guarantees ". He knows that, should Putin be removed, the nukes will safeguard his regime.
I remember back in the day, I thought getting rid of nukes for guarantees was a bit special needs.
 

NotADcotor

His most imperial galactic atheistic majesty.
Mar 8, 2017
7,260
4,898
113
Someone really should put Addict's comment about how Ukraine will fall by the end of the year and we are all a bunch of doodie heads [paraphrased] in their signature.

I'd do it, but I didn't choose the strange women in ponds lifestyle, it choose me... OK I choose it also.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

SchlongConery

License to Shill
Jan 28, 2013
13,662
7,714
113
e. Most people in power care about their legacy, not as if they need more wealth and power.

Which is why your fantasy of Poutine tossing nukes around and then reacting to a conventional counter attack with moar nukes is again insane.
That's what I think too
 

SchlongConery

License to Shill
Jan 28, 2013
13,662
7,714
113
Someone really should put Addict's comment about how Ukraine will fall by the end of the year and we are all a bunch of doodie heads [paraphrased] in their signature.

I'd do it, but I didn't choose the strange women in ponds lifestyle, it choose me... OK I choose it also.

It would take less bandwidth and electricity to mine a bitcoin than putting the Crow Eater's looooong list of guaranteed predictions on anyone's sig line!
 

SchlongConery

License to Shill
Jan 28, 2013
13,662
7,714
113
Ukraine is losing 10,000 drones a month to Russian electronic-warfare systems that send fake signals and screw with their navigation, researchers say

HOME MILITARY & DEFENSE
Ukraine is losing 10,000 drones a month to Russian electronic-warfare systems that send fake signals and screw with their navigation, researchers say
Mia Jankowicz
May 22, 2023, 7:33 AM EDT




  • A new report estimates Ukraine is losing roughly 10,000 drones every month.
  • A sophisticated electronic-warfare system is among Russia's biggest strengths, researchers said.
  • Ukraine "has the initiative" but Russia's army should not be written off, they added.
A new assessment of Russia's military capabilities on the front line estimated that its forces were taking down about 10,000 Ukrainian drones every month.

Electronic warfare is a "critical component" of Russia's tactics and contributing to the staggering losses of Ukrainian unmanned aerial vehicles, commonly known as drones, a report released Friday by the UK's Royal United Services Institute found.

The figures — which amount to more than 300 drones a day — were attributed to three unnamed Ukrainian officers interviewed in April and May.

The report did not specify which models comprised the claimed losses or in what proportion, but James Patton Rogers, a University of Southern Denmark war-studies professor and drone expert, told Insider the majority of those being lost were relatively cheap, small commercial drones used for surveillance.


The estimations indicate the unprecedented scale at which UAVs are being used in Ukraine, he said, adding that this was "one of the world's first drone vs. drone conflicts."

Patton Rogers said that while the figures were likely overestimated, they underlined just how effective Russia's electronic warfare had become at countering Ukraine's extensive use of drones.

The RUSI report said that along the roughly 750 miles of the conflict's front line, Russia maintained a major electronic-warfare system roughly every 6 miles. These are set back about 4 miles from the front and focused mainly on neutralizing drones, the report said.

Sophisticated Russian systems such as the Shipovnik-Aero jamming station are hard to detect and can imitate other signals, the researchers said.



"It also has a sophisticated range of effects for downing UAVs," they said, including interfering with navigational systems.
Ukraine fields a wide variety of drones, from small, commercial-grade UAVs often used for reconnaissance or as loitering munitions, up to the multimillion-dollar Bayraktar TB2, capable of taking out Russian tanks.
Drone warfare was a celebrated aspect of Ukraine's early success in holding back the Russian advance, prompting an official fundraising campaign — United24 — which was created to form a "drone army."
But by summer, it was clear that Russia's electronic-warfare and air-defense capabilities had ramped up, Insider's Alia Shoaib reported.

Frontline drone operators told The Guardian in April that one of the most popular models — the DJI commercial drone — was rapidly losing its effectiveness.

Nonetheless, Patton Rogers said, Ukraine is developing "its own resilient drone systems to fill this gap in capacity."

Overall, the RUSI researchers said that after the Russian army's "disaster" of a performance at the outset of the invasion, it had adapted to Ukraine's pushback, even as it continued to struggle with poor morale and effective use of heavy armor and air-force attacks.

"The result is a structure that becomes better over time at managing the problems it immediately faces but also one that struggles to anticipate new threats," the report said.

"Ukraine, today, has the initiative," it added. "But as the Russian military adapts, there can be no room for complacency."

Hey sucker!

Here is the Russian Ministry of Defense themselves bragging they shot down 12 drone in the last 24 hours!

"At its daily briefing on the Ukraine war, Russia's defence ministry said it had destroyed 12 Ukrainian drones in the past 24 hours and intercepted two long-range Storm Shadow cruise missiles that were supplied to Ukraine by Britain."

.


So let's do the math.... 12 drones per day x 30 days = 360 drones per month.

Ten thousand drones per month you say? :unsure:

You are such a gullible chump! :ROFLMAO:


PS. Not one person here believes anything you say or post.

PPS. I bet you don't either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: squeezer

Addict2sex

Well-known member
Jan 29, 2017
2,885
1,652
113
No, there is a reason why the plans are to put the president on an airplane when the balloon goes up. Known locations plus big and potentially accurate bombs, plus ground burst and perhaps multiple hits... Also you have to actually get there. As for Billionaires, sure they got bunkers... well a few of them do but again, it doesn't do much good unless you are there when the fecal matter hits the ventilation system. Also when you get out, it's going to suck [much less then if you were not there]. Also there will be plebs who actually have to follow the orders, plebs with families who are probably not protected, plebs who will wonder how shitty life will be after they leave the bunkers... assuming they got to the bunker and assuming the bunkers wasn't hit with several MT of love.

Add to that going down as the greatest mass murderer since Adolf Hitler, to quote Dr Strangelove. Most people in power care about their legacy, not as if they need more wealth and power.

Which is why your fantasy of Poutine tossing nukes around and then reacting to a conventional counter attack with moar nukes is again insane.

You so full of it… If you are a war hawk general …bet you willing to gamble your life and my life your thinking “ Which is why your fantasy of Poutine tossing nukes around and then reacting to a conventional counter attack with moar nukes is again insane.

Here Russia nuclear doctrine!

On possible nuclear strike, Russia says: it's all in our military doctrine


LONDON, May 10 (Reuters) - Asked if Russia would rule out a preemptive tactical nuclear strike on Ukraine, Russia's deputy foreign minister said on Tuesday that a decision on the possible use of nuclear weapons was clearly set out in Russia's military doctrine, RIA reported.

"We have a military doctrine - everything is written there," Alexander Grushko was quoted by state news agency RIA as saying.

Russia's official military deployment principles allow for the use of nuclear weapons if they - or other types of weapons of mass destruction - are used against it, or if the Russian state faces an existential threat from conventional weapons.

The decision to use Russia's vast nuclear arsenal, the biggest in the world, rests with the Russian president, currently Vladimir Putin.
Russia's invasion has killed thousands of people, displaced nearly 10 million, and raised fears of a wider confrontation between Russia and the United States - by far the world's biggest nuclear powers.
U.S. Central Intelligence Agency Director William Burns said on Saturday that Putin believes he cannot afford to lose in Ukraine and cautioned that the West could not ignore the risk of the use of tactical nuclear weapons by Moscow. read more
"We don't see, as an intelligence community, practical evidence at this point of Russian planning for a deployment or even use of tactical nuclear weapons," Burns said.
He cautioned, though, that "the stakes are very high for Putin's Russia."
NUCLEAR STRIKE?
A decree signed by Putin on June 2, 2020, said Russia views its nuclear weapons as "exclusively a means of deterrence".
It repeats the phraseology of the military doctrine but adds details about four circumstances under which a nuclear strike would be ordered. These include reliable information of a ballistic missile attack on Russia and an enemy's attack "on critical state or military installations of the Russian Federation, the incapacitation of which would lead to the disruption of a response by nuclear forces."
Putin, who has repeatedly expressed resentment over the way the West treated Russia after the 1991 fall of the Soviet Union, says Ukraine has been used by the United States to threaten Russia.
He justified his Feb. 24 order for a special military operation by saying Ukraine had persecuted Russian speakers and the United States was keen to enlarge the NATO military alliance in a way that would endanger Russia.
U.S. President Joe Biden casts Putin's invasion of Ukraine as a fight in a much broader global battle between democracy and autocracy. He has also called Putin a war criminal and has said the former KGB spy cannot remain in power.
Ukraine dismisses Russian claims that it persecuted Russian speakers and says it is fighting for its survival. Russia denies Ukrainian and Western accusations that its forces committed war crimes.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~__~~~~~~_~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~______~~~~~~~~~~~~……………………

PS. War hawk like you are a freaking menace to the world! There war hawk on both side of this conflict.All it take is one idiotic war hawk to convince their leader to push the button. I already see one senile leader in USA in President Biden that easy to convince to push the nuclear button. The other side Putin if he feel he country is under essential threat or other Russia war hawk able to convince Russia to strike first since they have the advantage! ( Hypersonic nuclear missile) why won’t be justifying using it first to defend mother Russia!


PS. All it take 4 hypersonic nuclear missile to destroy USA.

1) One hypersonic nuclear explosion over middle North America continent atmosphere will created a EMP pulse destroying most of North America infrastructure electrical grid that will destroy every electronic chip and electrical system in North America.

2) One hypersonic nuclear missile on Washington DC. to end all form of government ( White House, Congress, , All 3 letter mostly spy agencies in Washington DC.



3) One hypersonic nuclear in YellowStone National park to trigger a super volcano that will destroy most of USA.

4) One hypersonic nuclear on California to trigger San Andrea Fault Super or Mega Earthquake.

I won’t be surprised if other Russian war hawk generals might tempt convince Putin to used EMP nuclear device on Ukraine to end the war quickly. Used a EMP attack destroyed all Ukrainian defence and then moved quickly to Kiev to end this war quickly!

 
Last edited:

DinkleMouse

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2022
1,408
1,702
113
Once while someone will get fed up and start telling the truth.
When come to war or a proxy war , Truth or some of the truth will eventually come out or leak out when years later or decades later when the conflict ends!

Unfortunately nuke make the world a lot dangerous place …there no second chance for you and me or for the plebs. Meanswhile the important government’s official and families members and the important military personnel are safe in a bunker. And the billionaire have their private safe bunker from nuclear holcoast!

PS. Once the nuclear genie is released…there no coming back or a reset button for rest of us plebs.
So Putin a just, righteous man fighting Nazis in a justified war, in your opinion, but you also believe he's insane enough to use nuclear weapons? Why would you morally back a guy that you think might use nukes?
 

Addict2sex

Well-known member
Jan 29, 2017
2,885
1,652
113
Hey sucker!

Here is the Russian Ministry of Defense themselves bragging they shot down 12 drone in the last 24 hours!

"At its daily briefing on the Ukraine war, Russia's defence ministry said it had destroyed 12 Ukrainian drones in the past 24 hours and intercepted two long-range Storm Shadow cruise missiles that were supplied to Ukraine by Britain."

.


So let's do the math.... 12 drones per day x 30 days = 360 drones per month.

Ten thousand drones per month you say? :unsure:

You are such a gullible chump! :ROFLMAO:


PS. Not one person here believes anything you say or post.

PPS. I bet you don't either.
That was reported by Business insider reporter a liberal newspaper not by a Russian newspaper! So mainstream media fuck up again!
Nothing they say is truth . like Ukraine wining the war! Or Russia losing the war. Or hundreds thousands of Russian die by Ukrainian is true or lies ! So every things the mainstream media AntiPutin or ProUrkraine or Pro Zenlensky is reporting is true!
 
Last edited:

Addict2sex

Well-known member
Jan 29, 2017
2,885
1,652
113
So Putin a just, righteous man fighting Nazis in a justified war, in your opinion, but you also believe he's insane enough to use nuclear weapons? Why would you morally back a guy that you think might use nukes?
I did my research on Ukraine history and Putin ..unfortunately the west is in the wrong side of history! USA have a bad track record of lying and lots of endless war ! ( Syria, Libya, IRAQ, Kosovo, Serbia, Afganstein , Panama war by Ronald Reagan or Contra War , Vietman War) .

Soviet Union is no angel either with crime did did to the people behind Iron Curtain on the Eastern Bloc Countries or their own war too against affganstein too which they lost.
Russia today is not like old socialist government or the old soviets Union . They like capitalism!

Morally backing a guy means squat whether he is right or wrong! He being right might make you feel better, but you have to be realistic!
Sometime is necessary be pragmatic and learn to live with the necessary evil in the world! It hard to tell who telling the turth or lies or half truths or half lies!!
This is part of life. Nuke is the game changer, and for rest of humanity and “ on a enough long time line everyone survival rate drop to zero” . And life continues on for rest of humanity if no one don’t use nuke. And hopefully during this time humanity outlived this madness either caused by Putin or causes by Zelensky or by Biden or by NATO or by MIC, neocons , or neo liberal warhawks, This is a very dangerous time in the world today. Just look a the doomsday clock!

And if nuke are used by anyone… Unfortunately the cockroaches will out live everyone if someone use nuke .

Whoever have the upper hand ...holds the winning nuclear hands ! Putin have the upper hands he have hypersonic nukes! He have the advantage of first strike capability and will inflect the most damage will destroy most of USA and NATO first strike capability!
The second strike and third strike system will be launched by NATO and USA will cause the maybe destroyed part of Russia ( guessing on this) if not most of Russian too. Everyone will lose in the world and maybe China may come out ahead if we don’t get a nuclear winter.

Still holding out on the belief of MADD doctrine so no one panics and pressed the button.
That all I care about! I am only a pleb. I wake in morning get my exercise , enjoying my life and my retirement and my family . and play with my pet Labrador . That all I care about! The rest of the politicians can all go to hell ! In the end the all powerful politicians are liars & crooks! Usually the plebs if they are lucky get the scrap and enjoy their life.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: SchlongConery

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
96,982
25,311
113
I did my research on Ukraine history and Putin ..unfortunately the west is in the wrong side of history! USA have a bad track record of lying and lots of endless war ! ( Syria, Libya, IRAQ, Kosovo, Serbia, Afganstein , Panama war by Ronald Reagan or Contra War , Vietman War) .
Does Putin also lie?
Hasn't Russia also been in a lot of wars?
 

Addict2sex

Well-known member
Jan 29, 2017
2,885
1,652
113
Does Putin also lie?
Hasn't Russia also been in a lot of wars?
All politicians lie! And all Politicians lined their pockets with dirty money or they steal money or get money from bribes or somehow get money funded to them illegally by third party,. Probably also …I don’t keep track. Because I am born and live in Canada. It is easier to remember the foolishness of endless American wars . I rank a used car salesman trust worthness slightly higher then a politician or a comedian!
 
Last edited:

SchlongConery

License to Shill
Jan 28, 2013
13,662
7,714
113
That was reported by Business insider reporter a liberal newspaper not by a Russian newspaper! So mainstream media fuck up again!
Nothing they say is truth . like Ukraine wining the war! Or Russia losing the war. Or hundreds thousands of Russian die by Ukrainian is true or lies ! So every things the mainstream media AntiPutin or ProUrkraine or Pro Zenlensky is reporting is true!
But you posted it because it supports your narrative. And then you defended it when I called you out on the absurdity of the numbers.
I would say you lack critical thinking skills, but you are clearly just posting spam nonsense.

You must have eaten so much crow by now that it’s giving you indigestion.
 
Last edited:
  • Wow
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill and Adriel

Addict2sex

Well-known member
Jan 29, 2017
2,885
1,652
113
Top US General: Ukraine Should Not Use US Equipment To Attack Russia


SATURDAY, MAY 27, 2023 - 08:30 PM
Authored by Connor Freeman via AntiWar.com,
The top US general reaffirmed that Kiev has long been asked not to use military equipment provided by Washington to conduct attacks against Russian territory, according to Reuters. This policy is necessary because such attacks could provoke a direct clash between NATO and Russia, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley emphasized while speaking with reporters at the Pentagon on Thursday.
Milley’s comments came after a neo-Nazi group, which operates as part of Kiev’s armed forces and cooperates with Ukrainian military intelligence, carried out a cross-border raid in Russia. Denis Nikitin is the leader of the Russian Volunteer Corps, which is said to be made up of Russian citizens including some members of the neo-Nazi Azov Battalion who fought, since 2014, for Kiev during the Donbas war. Nikitin said his men were using US equipment, such as two M1224 MaxxPro armored vehicles, also known as MRAPs, during the raid. Members of another militia, the Freedom of Russia Legion, also participated in the assault.


Getty images

According to Russian officials, the terrorists launched mortar and artillery attacks against civilian infrastructure and residential areas in the Belgorod region on Monday. Ukraine’s military intelligence hints that they were behind the attack, while stopping short of officially taking credit. Though, some documents included in the Discord Leaks suggest that Ukrainian President Zelensky’s regime was planning similar operations, specifically using these Russian volunteers equipped with "various qualitative types of NATO weapons."
According to the New York Times, US officials believe Kiev was behind Monday’s raid and the recent attempted drone strike on the Kremlin, which Moscow believes was an attempt to kill Russian President Vladimir Putin. The officials also believe Kiev is responsible for a series of assassinations and other covert attacks within Russia. Moreover, the deputy head of Ukraine’s main intelligence directorate admitted this week that they are actively attempting to assassinate Putin and other Russian officials.
Kiev’s position is that the Belgorod raid was carried out independently from Zelensky’s intelligence and military services. But the Freedom of Russia Legion’s special representative, Ilya Ponomarev, said the group received Kiev’s "green light" regarding the attack. Pictures and videos posted by the Russian military have confirmed Nikitin’s claims.
“It is no secret for us that more and more equipment is being delivered to Ukraine’s armed forces,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Wednesday when asked by reporters about the militias’ U.S.-made hardware.
Contrarily, Milley refused to say Washington has drawn any firm conclusions yet. “I can’t say with definitive accuracy right this minute to you whether that – and I saw the same video – whether that’s U.S. supplied equipment or not, what was the nature of the attack, who did what to whom,” Milley insisted.
He continued, "…but I can say that we have asked the Ukrainians not to use U.S.-supplied equipment for direct attacks into Russia." For its part, Reuters stated they were "able to confirm the location of damaged [U.S.-made military hardware such as Humvee military trucks] and surrounding details shown in the video, though could not verify the date it was filmed."
Kiev has ostensibly pledged not to use long-range weapons provided by Washington to attack Russia, but leaked documents also show that Zelensky does not intend to keep his word. Earlier this month, the Washington Post reported that "behind closed doors, Ukraine’s leader has proposed going in a more audacious direction – occupying Russian villages to gain leverage over Moscow, bombing a pipeline that transfers Russian oil to Hungary, a NATO member, and privately pining for long-range missiles to hit targets inside Russia’s borders, according to classified US intelligence documents detailing his internal communications with top aides and military leaders."
However, the Joe Biden administration has now greenlit their European allies’ plans to transfer F-16s to Ukraine. Biden proclaims that he has received Zelensky’s "flat assurance" that the fighter jets will not be used to attack Russia.
Though, Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) told a reporter on Wednesday that he "wouldn’t care if they did," reflecting the uber hawkishness that has become acceptable within the US Congress. Furnishing Zelensky’s regime with warplanes was long ruled out over fears that it would be perceived by Moscow as the alliance directly entering the war.
"We see that Western countries are still adhering to the escalation scenario. It involves colossal risks for themselves," Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Alexander Grushko admonished the alliance after the Western plans to send F-16s to Ukraine became public. When asked about the Russian official’s warning, Biden threatened "it is for them."



Milley explained these restrictions are ostensibly implemented in hopes of avoiding a direct war with Russia. “Why is that? Because we don’t want – this is a Ukrainian war. It is not a war between the United States and Russia. It’s not a war between NATO and Russia,” Milley said.

The general’s claims fall flat given the fact that, so far, the US has pledged $113 billion backing Kiev in this proxy war. Washington’s Ukraine policy is explicitly designed to "weaken" Russia as Pentagon chief Lloyd Austin made clear last year.

The White House is shipping Bradley armored fighting vehicles, longer range rockets, Patriot missile systems, and M1 Abrams tanks to the battlefield. Concurrently, the CIA is reportedly conducting sabotage attacks on Russian infrastructure and the Pentagon has tacitly endorsed Kiev’s drone strikes hundreds of miles deep inside the Russian mainland. The UK has armed Zelensky’s regime with depleted uranium munitions, linked to cancer and birth defects, which are being fired at Russian troops by British tanks. Far exceeding the reach of any weapons system the US has pledged, London has equipped Kiev with Storm Shadow missiles with a range of more than 155 miles. The missiles can be fired by the MIG-29 warplanes NATO members Slovenia and Poland sent to Ukraine earlier this year.

Beyond the Washington-led bloc’s massive military aid, an assortment of NATO commandos, US troops, CIA, and Special Operations forces are on the ground in Ukraine as well.
 

Adriel

Snatch Stealer
May 10, 2023
157
114
43
That was reported by Business insider reporter a liberal newspaper not by a Russian newspaper! So mainstream media fuck up again!
Nothing they say is truth . like Ukraine wining the war! Or Russia losing the war. Or hundreds thousands of Russian die by Ukrainian is true or lies ! So every things the mainstream media AntiPutin or ProUrkraine or Pro Zenlensky is reporting is true!
You used Business Insider to make a point and now that it is proven wrong you accuse it of being liberal? You did not know that when you posted it or did you do that because it was favourable to you?
 

Addict2sex

Well-known member
Jan 29, 2017
2,885
1,652
113
But you posted it because it supports your narrative. And then you defended it when I called you out on the absurdity of the numbers.
I would say you like critical thinking skills, but you are clearly just posting spam nonsense.

You must have so much pro it’s giving you indigestion.
I still firmly believe in the number that Ukrainian dead and wounded it in the 300, 000: range killed and probably wounded in that range too maybe wound and killed somewhere around 500,000 . Don’t remember the number. Saw a video where someone an war analyst speculated that number can’t remember where that video I saw in you tube. Russian range killed probably 20,000 and wounded another 30,000 . When the ar is over and years from now the true number will eventually come out.
 

NotADcotor

His most imperial galactic atheistic majesty.
Mar 8, 2017
7,260
4,898
113
You so full of it… If you are a war hawk general …bet you willing to gamble your life and my life your thinking “ Which is why your fantasy of Poutine tossing nukes around and then reacting to a conventional counter attack with moar nukes is again insane.
You seem to think Poutine is willing to gamble his life away. You just don't get it do you. I can't really explain it more simply.

Also
"
"We have a military doctrine - everything is written there," Alexander Grushko was quoted by state news agency RIA as saying.

Russia's official military deployment principles allow for the use of nuclear weapons if they - or other types of weapons of mass destruction - are used against it, or if the Russian state faces an existential threat from conventional weapons."

Ukraine taking back it's clay is not an existential risk to Russia. SO you have established either
1: By Russian doctrine they will not use nukes vs Ukraine or
2: You don't understand the words existential threat.

For that matter, losing the black sea fleet also isn't an existential threat either. It would suck, but Mother Russia is not under any threat, definitely not it's existence.

To quote Laurence Fishbourne from Pulp Fiction. English, do you speak it mother fucker.

"The decision to use Russia's vast nuclear arsenal, the biggest in the world, rests with the Russian president, currently Vladimir Putin."

Actually I've heard to the contrary.
The President of Russia (the Supreme Commander-in-Chief) has a cheget on hand at all times. It is one of three, with the other two held by the Minister of Defence and the Chief of the General Staff. It may be that affirmations from two of the three are needed to trigger an actual launch
But who cares what the Economist, the Moscow Times and Strategic Insights say on the topic.

It repeats the phraseology of the military doctrine but adds details about four circumstances under which a nuclear strike would be ordered. These include reliable information of a ballistic missile attack on Russia and an enemy's attack "on critical state or military installations of the Russian Federation, the incapacitation of which would lead to the disruption of a response by nuclear forces."

Neither of which covers losing Ukraine clay or taking out naval assets at least at sea.
Also even if they could, doesn't mean they would. If you have a policy to punch anyone in the face who calls you a fag and Classic Era Mike Tyson calls you a fag... you probably will offer to suck his dick if you had any brains.


The other side Putin if he feel he country is under essential threat or other Russia war hawk able to convince Russia to strike first since they have the advantage! ( Hypersonic nuclear missile) why won’t be justifying using it first to defend mother Russia!
You know that all ICBMs would easily count as hypersonic right? How to let people know you are using buzz words without understanding them without actually telling them.
"All of the intercontinental ballistic missiles in the world's nuclear arsenals are hypersonic, reaching about 15,000 mph (24,140 kph), or about 4 miles (6.4 km) per second at their maximum velocity."
Also using nukes first doesn't defend mother Russia, it means at the lease they get fucked and at the worse they get turned to glass. Why can't you get that through your thick skull.

"1) One hypersonic nuclear explosion over middle North America continent atmosphere will created a EMP pulse destroying most of North America infrastructure electrical grid that will destroy every electronic chip and electrical system in North America."
It would take more than one for serious coverage... also erm Europe? Also it would do nothing to the US military who are hardened vs this sort of stuff nor would it do shit to their nuclear assets... guess what happens in response

2) One hypersonic nuclear missile on Washington DC. to end all form of government ( White House, Congress, , All 3 letter mostly spy agencies in Washington DC.
Well good thing Russia doesn't have a capital city right...
Also and if they are not all there...
Also there are 5 branches of military all with their chain of command and 50 states each with their own leadership.

3) One hypersonic nuclear in YellowStone National park to trigger a super volcano that will destroy most of USA."

Oh well is some rando on youtube says this is a thing, it has to be a thing. I am not a geologist nor have I ever stayed at a best western express, but from what little I've read about yellowstone, I kinda doubt it. Put that video in the bucket with the tons of other youtube garbage that floats out there. Oh wait, it supports your thesis so it must be right...
Oh fuck, the inforgraphics show, everything I've seen from them that intersects with my knowledge base is pure hot garbage, and I am not the only person to make that observation.

Also The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) also states that it is very unlikely that a nuclear blast could trigger an eruption of Yellowstone. The now-dormant volcano has been undisturbed by much greater releases of energy in the form of earthquakes


4) One hypersonic nuclear on California to trigger San Andrea Fault Super or Mega Earthquake.

Wasn't that the plot to a Superman movie, or a James Bond movie, or Austin Powers. Riiiiight
Also no

I know some Russian strategist is saying this would be a good idea and of course ye of limited critial thinking skills bought it hook line and sinker... the same people who said that a few nukes could literally remove England off the map and leave nothing but water behind... a claim believed by Jordan Peterson but not anybody who has the slightest clue about nuclear weapons such as one whom your present interlocutor is in the habit of defining by means of the perpendicular pronoun.

I won’t be surprised if other Russian war hawk generals might tempt convince Putin to used EMP nuclear device on Ukraine to end the war quickly. Used a EMP attack destroyed all Ukrainian defence and then moved quickly to Kiev to end this war quickly!

Which is why the US must not only be seen to be willing to do what it takes to make this the wrong decision but actually follow through.

Please... just stop. What you've just said... is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point, in your rambling, incoherent response, were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
 
Last edited:

SchlongConery

License to Shill
Jan 28, 2013
13,662
7,714
113
All politicians lie! And all Politicians lined their pockets with dirty money or they steal money or get money from bribes or somehow get money funded to them illegally by third party,. Probably also …I don’t keep track. Because I am born and live in Canada. It is easier to remember the foolishness of endless American wars . I rank a used car salesman trust worthness slightly higher then a politician or a comedian!
You are so full of shit. And crow.

I am not going to go back to track it down but you were not born in Canada and english is not your first, second or third language either. And you are not a P. Eng and PEO member. You are a "engineering designer" whatever that is.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts